跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

ev-pipeline

Top-level orchestrator for the Gaia Skill Tree evidence verification pipeline. Run this when you want to do a full evidence pass — collecting raw sources, verifying live GitHub star counts, running Phase 2B benchmark-source verification, adversarially auditing for quality/formatting issues, and checking that every URL is reachable — all in one coordinated sequence. Trigger phrases: "run the evidence pipeline", "full evidence pass", "verify evidence", "evidence verification pipeline", "run ev-pipeline", "check all evidence", "audit the data lake", "evidence quality sweep", "refresh evidence", "validate evidence sources". Also aliased as /evidence-verification-pipeline. Use the individual sub-skills (ev-collection, ev-star-verification, ev-adversarial-audit, ev-link-validation) only when you need to re-run one phase in isolation; for end-to-end work, always start here.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

集成工具GitHub
查看安装方法

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md6.0 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Evidence Verification Pipeline (ev-pipeline)

Orchestrates the evidence verification phases that take raw evidence from collected to audited and link-checked before ingestion. It operates on the evidence/ data lake only and does not mutate registry files.

Type-First Evidence Lake Contract (#1148)

The evidence lake is type-first. The primary working set for every phase is evidence/by-type/<canonical-evidence-type>.md using the canonical evidence vocabulary: repo-own, github-stars-own, social-signal, benchmark-result, arxiv, peer-review, proxy-containment, verifier-attestation, fusion-recipe, and self-attestation.

Legacy evidence/tier_*.md files may still exist as coexistence artifacts for older tooling, but they are not the semantic routing key. New collection, audit, compile, and handoff work must route by evidence type.

Multi-Target Peer-Review Source Packets (#1418)

When one legitimate peer-review URL truly reviews multiple named skills, materialize a scratch peer-review partition instead of duplicating registry rows or hand-writing generated lake files:

python evidence/scripts/peer_review_source_packets.py \
  --manifest /path/to/manifest.json \
  --by-type-dir /tmp/ev1418/by-type

The packet contract is peer-review-only, expands to one temporary row per reviewed skill in peer-review.md, and may repeat the same URL once per target skill when the source genuinely covers each one. Reject strength/scoring fields anywhere in the packet (trustNumber, grade, class, tier, level, stars, rank). Do not commit scratch manifests or generated partitions without human approval.

graph TD
    Phase0[Phase 0: ev-discovery (skippable)] -->|Append discovered rows| A
    A[Phase 1: ev-collection] -->|Materialize + compile by evidence type| B[Phase 2: ev-star-verification]
    B -->|Verify live stars, no rank repartition| B2[Phase 2B: ev-benchmark-verification]
    B2 -->|Classify benchmark sources + candidate manifests| C[Phase 3: ev-adversarial-audit]
    C -->|Audit by-type files| D[Phase 4: ev-link-validation]
    D -->|Validate URL health| E[Source Report & Ingestion Handoff]

Phase Responsibilities

  • Phase 0 — ev-discovery (skippable): searches for new Stage-2 evidence on declared need and appends discovered rows into source inputs for Phase 1. It does not score or rank evidence.
  • Phase 1 — ev-collection: materializes primary partitions under evidence/by-type/ and compiles evidence/unified_evidence_lake.md from those by-type files. It may emit tier_*.md only as coexistence output.
  • Phase 2 — ev-star-verification: verifies live GitHub stargazer counts and records stale/inflated metrics. It must not repartition the lake by rank; by-type partitions remain primary.
  • Phase 2B — ev-benchmark-verification: verifies benchmark-result rows and optional candidate manifests against registry/benchmark-sources.json. It classifies benchmark lanes (verified = CI/verifier reproduced, 2.0x; reported = public claim or mirrored evidence accepted by the human gate, 1.0x; rejected = blacklist/no scoring, 0x), catalog status, unknown benchmarkIds, missing verified-lane reproducibility fields, and malformed percentiles without mutating the registry. Legacy aliases normalize safely: ci-reproduced/verifier-attested → verified, mirrored → reported, and pending/candidate/retired/unknown → rejected. appliesToGenericSkillRefs says which generic capability buckets a benchmark evaluates; it does not create a named-skill score.
  • Phase 3 — ev-adversarial-audit: audits by-type files for bad URLs, subjective wording, proxy/source mismatches, stale notes, benchmark catalog misuse/vendor-claim leakage, and star/evidence inconsistencies.
  • Phase 4 — ev-link-validation: validates URL health. validate_sources.py remains a temporary coexistence URL-health shim while the lake is type-first.

Additive loop — no green gate

Evidence is additive, not pass/fail. New rows can arrive from Stage 1 minimum rows (github-stars-own, repo-own, self-attestation) or from skippable Phase 0 discovery (benchmark-result, arxiv, peer-review, richer social-signal). Benchmark rows add a dedicated human gate: after Phase 2B, Phase 3, and Phase 4, humans must approve a candidate as reported benchmark evidence or reject/blacklist it; verified rows require CI/verifier reproducibility. Machines classify, humans approve or reject. A benchmark catalog entry may name generic refs via appliesToGenericSkillRefs, but it creates no named-skill score and no Trust Magnitude contribution until a named benchmark-result row lands in a scoring lane. Trust Magnitude and rank are recomputed at appraisal time.

Outputs and Handoff

Generated evidence outputs are review artifacts, not registry mutation. Do not commit generated evidence/by-type/**, evidence/tier_*.md, source reports, validation reports, unified lake files, seeds, or collector rows without a human gate. For L4-approved intake, pass a reviewed manifest of live, correctly scoped rows to /gaia-ingest-batch.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

ci-churn

免费

Measure CI churn cost for a pull request: how many commits and how many CI-compute seconds were burned on avoidable "fix the CI" push rounds. Use when you want to understand the efficiency cost of a PR's iteration cycle, get actionable pre-push check suggestions, or include a churn summary in a pipeline report. Triggers: "ci churn", "how much CI did we burn", "avoidable commits", "ci efficiency", "wasted CI time", "churn report", "/ci-churn". Called automatically by /fp-drift at pipeline close.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

gaia-research/gaia-skill-tree232026年10月23日 更新

Produce the rendered evidence a human-gated frontend PR owes its reviewer: capture each changed surface (plus the before state for anything modified, plus mobile width), then generate one self-contained local HTML page the founder can open and review without checking anything out. Use when a PR is gated by the "Frontend changes are HUMAN-GATED" section of CLAUDE.md, or when the user says "/design-gate", "screenshot evidence for this PR", "prep this for founder review", "build the design evidence page", "what does this look like before and after". The page comes from a template script, not hand-written markup. Output is session-local and never committed. Do NOT use for non-gated changes: typo/grammar/factual fixes in an unchanged block, dead link targets, alt/ARIA fixes with no visual change, cache-bust bumps, or refactors with no rendered diff.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

gaia-research/gaia-skill-tree232026年10月23日 更新

One-fix-at-a-time, approval-gated design fix recovery. Given a checklist of fixes (handover doc, CHECKLIST.md, or inline list), applies each individually, presents a diff, and waits for an explicit APPROVE / REJECT / NO CHANGES decision before committing. Trigger phrases: /design-iteration, "go through the checklist one by one", "fix these one at a time", "bucket recovery", "design fix pass".

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

gaia-research/gaia-skill-tree232026年10月23日 更新

Playbook for correcting a named skill's star level to match its computed Trust Magnitude grade, with an independent post-calibration verification pass and a CLI-logged timeline event (never hand-written). Use when: recalibrating a skill's level, fixing a stale or drifted star rating, running a batch of `gaia dev calibrate` corrections, or confirming a past calibration actually landed. Triggers: "calibrate <skill>", "recalibrate the trust magnitude backlog", "promote/demote <skill> to N stars", "why is <skill> still N stars", "verify a calibration actually landed", "Hall of Heroes ranking is wrong".

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

gaia-research/gaia-skill-tree232026年10月23日 更新

Close out a completed EPIC / sprint end-to-end: author a fact-verified meta-post announcing what shipped, archive the EPIC's handovers, snapshot orchestrator memory, gate the integration→main merge on CI-green + explicit human go, drive the version bump (merge-commit conventions that auto-sync classifies), and verify the release reached the registry/PyPI. Use when the user says "close out EPIC <n>", "wrap up the sprint", "ship the meta shift", "/epic-close", or asks to finalize an integration branch that is ready to merge to main. Generalizes the EPIC 1002 (Yggdrasil II) close-out. This skill orchestrates — it authors founder docs directly (superadmin) and delegates code/regen to workers; it NEVER merges to main without the human gate.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

gaia-research/gaia-skill-tree232026年10月23日 更新

Run this skill for Phase 3 of the evidence verification pipeline — the adversarial audit step. Use when you need to check the evidence data lake for bad data before ingestion: dead links, wrong URL formats (tree/ vs blob/), subjective wording ("elite", "high-quality"), stale migration notes, benchmark catalog misuse/vendor-claim leakage, or skills whose star evidence conflicts with classified evidence level. Triggers on phrases like: "audit the data lake", "adversarial check", "ev-adversarial-audit", "check for noise in evidence", "flag bad evidence", "run the audit phase", "quality check the by-type files", or any reference to Phase 3 of the pipeline.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

gaia-research/gaia-skill-tree232026年10月23日 更新

查看 gaia-research 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题