跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

fp-review

Adversarially review the full relevant PR diff with isolated probes and meaningful before/after checks. Use for "review the PR", "sandbox review", or the review stage; retain required reviewer independence and report self- review limits honestly.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md2.9 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Review the complete change

Objective: give the authorized reviewer evidence of correctness and defects.

Shared execution contract

Read ../feature-pipeline/SKILL.md relative to this skill directory. Inherit its mode, authority, hard stops and finish-state proof. Default is structured economy; lean mode may combine stages. A routine checkpoint records progress and continues in lean/economy mode. Only explicit hard-gated milestones or an actual unapproved authority boundary wait for human approval. Standalone invocation ends when this skill's scoped deliverable is complete; it does not require approval to perform already-authorized work. Use the actual harness tools, never invented spawn APIs.

State helper: bash .agents/skills/feature-pipeline/scripts/state.sh. Inspect existing state and Git/PR state before work. State and planApproved are recovery notes, never authorization or L4 approval. Refer to the shared skill's checkpoint command before advancing; do not classify a real boundary as routine.

Work and done-check

Recover the PR base and current SHA (phase 4 follows implementation). Review the full relevant diff against that base, including original commits and outward contracts, rather than a convenient last commit or assumed origin/main base. Use a fresh independent reviewer and isolated worktree when required or valuable. Cheap worker + cheap reviewer is a supported economy path; independence does not require a fixed higher model tier.

Reproduce relevant defects before the fix and success afterward when practical. Run adversarial boundary cases for changed authorization or input handling and appropriate existing validators. Schema changes use graph validation; canonical skills use quality/playbook/mirror checks; generated artifact changes use their builder checks. A prose-only edit does not itself require rebuilding every doc. Never revert another worker's live worktree to produce a RED test.

Return SHA, changed surfaces, commands/results, findings with file/line and verdict. Post a PR comment only if authorized; otherwise save the review locally. Record its path or authorized URL. Do not approve your own required independent control. If no independent reviewer is available, record self-review honestly, continue independent work and hold the required review/merge gate with a concrete handover.

Done: review evidence exists and limits are explicit. Advance phase to 5; verified findings go to fp-iterate. In hard-gated mode M3 presents the review and waits. No implementation commits are authored by this read-only review entrypoint.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

ci-churn

免费

Measure CI churn cost for a pull request: how many commits and how many CI-compute seconds were burned on avoidable "fix the CI" push rounds. Use when you want to understand the efficiency cost of a PR's iteration cycle, get actionable pre-push check suggestions, or include a churn summary in a pipeline report. Triggers: "ci churn", "how much CI did we burn", "avoidable commits", "ci efficiency", "wasted CI time", "churn report", "/ci-churn". Called automatically by /fp-drift at pipeline close.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

gaia-research/gaia-skill-tree232026年10月23日 更新

Produce the rendered evidence a human-gated frontend PR owes its reviewer: capture each changed surface (plus the before state for anything modified, plus mobile width), then generate one self-contained local HTML page the founder can open and review without checking anything out. Use when a PR is gated by the "Frontend changes are HUMAN-GATED" section of CLAUDE.md, or when the user says "/design-gate", "screenshot evidence for this PR", "prep this for founder review", "build the design evidence page", "what does this look like before and after". The page comes from a template script, not hand-written markup. Output is session-local and never committed. Do NOT use for non-gated changes: typo/grammar/factual fixes in an unchanged block, dead link targets, alt/ARIA fixes with no visual change, cache-bust bumps, or refactors with no rendered diff.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

gaia-research/gaia-skill-tree232026年10月23日 更新

One-fix-at-a-time, approval-gated design fix recovery. Given a checklist of fixes (handover doc, CHECKLIST.md, or inline list), applies each individually, presents a diff, and waits for an explicit APPROVE / REJECT / NO CHANGES decision before committing. Trigger phrases: /design-iteration, "go through the checklist one by one", "fix these one at a time", "bucket recovery", "design fix pass".

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

gaia-research/gaia-skill-tree232026年10月23日 更新

Playbook for correcting a named skill's star level to match its computed Trust Magnitude grade, with an independent post-calibration verification pass and a CLI-logged timeline event (never hand-written). Use when: recalibrating a skill's level, fixing a stale or drifted star rating, running a batch of `gaia dev calibrate` corrections, or confirming a past calibration actually landed. Triggers: "calibrate <skill>", "recalibrate the trust magnitude backlog", "promote/demote <skill> to N stars", "why is <skill> still N stars", "verify a calibration actually landed", "Hall of Heroes ranking is wrong".

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

gaia-research/gaia-skill-tree232026年10月23日 更新

Close out a completed EPIC / sprint end-to-end: author a fact-verified meta-post announcing what shipped, archive the EPIC's handovers, snapshot orchestrator memory, gate the integration→main merge on CI-green + explicit human go, drive the version bump (merge-commit conventions that auto-sync classifies), and verify the release reached the registry/PyPI. Use when the user says "close out EPIC <n>", "wrap up the sprint", "ship the meta shift", "/epic-close", or asks to finalize an integration branch that is ready to merge to main. Generalizes the EPIC 1002 (Yggdrasil II) close-out. This skill orchestrates — it authors founder docs directly (superadmin) and delegates code/regen to workers; it NEVER merges to main without the human gate.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

gaia-research/gaia-skill-tree232026年10月23日 更新

Run this skill for Phase 3 of the evidence verification pipeline — the adversarial audit step. Use when you need to check the evidence data lake for bad data before ingestion: dead links, wrong URL formats (tree/ vs blob/), subjective wording ("elite", "high-quality"), stale migration notes, benchmark catalog misuse/vendor-claim leakage, or skills whose star evidence conflicts with classified evidence level. Triggers on phrases like: "audit the data lake", "adversarial check", "ev-adversarial-audit", "check for noise in evidence", "flag bad evidence", "run the audit phase", "quality check the by-type files", or any reference to Phase 3 of the pipeline.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

gaia-research/gaia-skill-tree232026年10月23日 更新

查看 gaia-research 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题