跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

review-response

Turn paper reviews into structured, professional responses. Classify comments, choose whether to revise, defend, clarify, or propose experiments, and draft a rebuttal that addresses every point with evidence and a respectful tone.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

Systematic review response workflow from comment analysis to professional rebuttal writing. Use when the user asks to "write rebuttal", "respond to reviewers", "draft review response", or "analyze review comments". Improves paper acceptance rates.

查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Classifying reviewer comments by issue type
  • Choosing a response strategy for each comment
  • Drafting responses linked to paper sections or results
  • Checking response tone and coverage

包含的文件(6)

  • SKILL.md5.6 KB
  • references/rebuttal-templates.md16.9 KB
  • references/response-strategies.md18.8 KB
  • references/review-classification.md3.4 KB
  • references/successful-cases.md10.5 KB
  • references/tone-guidelines.md9.6 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Review Response

A systematic review response workflow that helps researchers efficiently and professionally reply to reviewer comments.

Core Features

  1. Review Analysis - Parse and classify reviewer comments (Major/Minor/Typo/Misunderstanding)
  2. Response Strategy - Develop response strategies for different comment types (Accept/Defend/Clarify/Experiment)
  3. Rebuttal Writing - Write structured, professional rebuttal documents
  4. Tone Management - Optimize tone to maintain professionalism, respect, and evidence-based arguments

Workflow

Receive reviewer comments -> Parse and classify -> Develop strategy -> Write responses -> Tone check -> Final rebuttal

When to Use

Use this skill when you need to:

  • "Help me write a rebuttal"
  • "How to respond to reviewer comments"
  • "Analyze these review comments"
  • "Develop a review response strategy"

Usage Steps

  1. Provide reviewer comments - Share the reviewer comments text or file with Claude
  2. Analysis and classification - Claude automatically parses and classifies the comments
  3. Strategy recommendations - Receive response strategy suggestions for each comment
  4. Write rebuttal - Generate a structured rebuttal document based on the strategy
  5. Optimize tone - Review and optimize the professionalism and politeness of responses

Core Principles

  • Professionalism - Maintain an academically professional tone and expression
  • Respectfulness - Respect the reviewers' opinions and time
  • Evidence-based - Support every response with sufficient reasoning and evidence
  • Completeness - Ensure all reviewer comments receive a response

Success Factors (Based on ICLR Spotlight Paper Analysis)

Key lessons extracted from successful rebuttal cases:

1. Acknowledge Strengths, Respond Positively to Criticism

  • Reviewers will first acknowledge the paper's strengths (novelty, impact, practical applicability)
  • Even spotlight papers receive constructive criticism
  • Strategy: Thank reviewers for acknowledged strengths first, then address criticism specifically

2. Provide Clarity and Intuitive Understanding

  • Even high-quality papers may have clarity issues
  • Need to provide intuition and detailed explanations for readers with different backgrounds
  • Strategy: Expand key sections, move technical details to appendix, add step-by-step walkthroughs

3. Thorough Justification of Experimental Setup

  • Need to justify experimental setup choices
  • Consider and discuss alternative metrics
  • Provide comprehensive experiments to support claims
  • Strategy: Add ablation studies, explain why specific experimental setups were chosen

4. Emphasis on Ethical Considerations

  • For research involving privacy, security, and other sensitive topics, ethical considerations are crucial
  • Reviewers pay special attention to ethical implications
  • Strategy: Proactively discuss ethical considerations, even if reviewers don't explicitly request it

5. Highlight Practical Application Value

  • Reviewers value practical applicability and scalability of methods
  • "Easily applicable" and "scalable" are important strengths
  • Strategy: Emphasize practical benefits and scalability in the rebuttal

Integration with active installed writing memory

When the rebuttal task involves:

  • tone calibration,
  • rebuttal phrasing,
  • clarification language,
  • structuring multi-point responses,
  • or learning from strong prior paper/review writing,

read the active installed writing memory before drafting:

  • ~/.claude/skills/ml-paper-writing/references/knowledge/paper-miner-writing-memory.md on Claude Code installs
  • the equivalent installed skill-home path on Codex/OpenCode branches
  • otherwise skip this optional memory and continue with the local review-response references

Default read order for rebuttal work

  1. reviewer comments and paper context
  2. optional paper-miner-writing-memory.md if available
  3. references/response-strategies.md
  4. references/rebuttal-templates.md
  5. references/tone-guidelines.md

Read narrowly:

  • start with How this helps our writing,
  • then inspect Reusable phrasing,
  • then inspect Venue-specific signals if the rebuttal is venue-sensitive,
  • use Writing patterns mined only when the response needs stronger rhetorical structure.

Do not quote the memory mechanically. Use it to improve structure, clarity, restraint, and professionalism.

Evidence anchor rule

Every response row must include one of:

  • paper location,
  • result table / figure / analysis artifact,
  • citation / Evidence Record ID,
  • planned experiment with status,
  • unresolved if no evidence exists yet.

Do not claim "we added experiments" or "the results show" without naming the artifact. If an objection has multiple atomic points, split it and cover each point separately.

Reference Documents

For detailed guides, refer to:

  • references/review-classification.md - Review comment classification criteria
  • references/response-strategies.md - Response strategy library
  • references/rebuttal-templates.md - Rebuttal templates and examples
  • references/tone-guidelines.md - Tone and expression guidelines

Related Tools

  • Agent: rebuttal-writer - Dedicated agent for rebuttal writing and optimization
  • Command: /rebuttal <review_file> - Quick-start the rebuttal workflow

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Create and configure Claude Code agents using Markdown files with YAML configuration headers. Define when each agent should run, write its responsibilities and workflow, choose models and tools, and check configuration and triggering behavior.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Create a Claude Code subagent
  • Define triggering conditions with concrete examples
  • Configure an agent's model, color, and tools
Galaxy-Dawn/claude-scholar58832026年10月19日 更新

Add datasets, models, and other components to machine learning projects using consistent registration and creation patterns. The skill guides file placement, configuration, and automatic module loading so new components fit the project's established architecture.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Adding a registered Dataset class
  • Creating a model driven by configuration
  • Wiring registration and creation logic in a new module
Galaxy-Dawn/claude-scholar58832026年10月19日 更新

Investigate code errors through a structured process using reproduction steps, logs, and testable explanations. The workflow guides fault isolation, fixes, and follow-up checks, with common error patterns for Python, JavaScript/TypeScript, and Bash/Zsh.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Investigating an error using logs and reproduction steps
  • Finding why code broke after a recent change
  • Troubleshooting common shell script errors
Galaxy-Dawn/claude-scholar58832026年10月19日 更新

Check academic references for existence, accurate publication details, and support for the claims being cited. This guide explains how to verify sources, obtain bibliography entries, and flag references that cannot be confirmed.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Checking references suggested by AI
  • Verifying authors, titles, and publication years
  • Checking whether a paper supports a cited claim
Galaxy-Dawn/claude-scholar58832026年10月19日 更新

Review code changes and pull requests for correctness, security, performance, and test quality. The skill helps prioritize issues, write specific and constructive feedback, and create shared review checklists and standards for a development team.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Reviewing code changes and pull requests
  • Writing review comments with clear priorities and fixes
  • Creating shared review checklists for a team
Galaxy-Dawn/claude-scholar58832026年10月19日 更新

Create reusable slash commands, prompts invoked by typing a slash, for Claude Code. The skill explains Markdown structure, arguments, file references, tool permissions, and plugin integration so recurring tasks can follow a defined workflow.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Turning recurring prompts into slash commands
  • Creating review commands with arguments and file references
  • Sharing project-specific commands with a team
Galaxy-Dawn/claude-scholar58832026年10月19日 更新

查看 Galaxy-Dawn 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题