Use when touching retiring old logic, collapsing duplicate owners, removing fallbacks, or schema/persistence/source-of-truth boundaries; identify opportunities automatically; destructive execution requires explicit confirmation.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use when the user explicitly sets an Aegis goal with /aegis-goal, Aegis goal:, or asks to define goal, success evidence, stop condition, or task boundaries before work.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
查看安装方法安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。
Use this skill to create a thin goal frame before execution. It is opt-in and boundary-setting only.
Do not use it for tiny edits, one-command checks, or ordinary fast-path Q&A
unless the user explicitly asks for /aegis-goal or Aegis goal:.
Current owner:
Not owned here:
GateDecisionTreat these as equivalent:
/aegis-goal <task description>Aegis goal: <task description>Slash commands are optional host shortcuts. The natural-language form is the portable fallback.
Example:
Aegis goal: Fix the auth refresh bug without rewriting the auth system.
Produce the smallest useful frame, then continue into the routed workflow in the same turn.
TaskIntentDraft:
- Requested outcome:
- Goal:
- Success evidence:
- Stop condition:
- Non-goals:
- Constraints:
- Scope:
- Risk hints:
- Aegis Visibility:
- Route:
- Next:
Default behavior:
TaskIntentDraft.Next action for the selected
route when the user asked to do the work.Aegis Visibility to say why the goal frame constrains the route, stop
condition, or non-goals. Do not add trace ceremony unless the user explicitly
asks for auditability.Frame-only behavior:
blocked rather than pretending to continue.Stop condition must distinguish:
State set: done, blocked, needs-verification, scope-exceeded.
done: success evidence is satisfiedblocked: required dependency, permission, or information is missingneeds-verification: implementation exists but evidence is insufficientscope-exceeded: continuing would exceed the goal or non-goalsAfter framing:
brainstormingwriting-planslong-task-continuationsystematic-debugging| Goal signal | Route |
|---|---|
| single-owner, low-risk, clear verification | fast path or test-driven-development |
| bug, failure, regression, unexpected behavior | systematic-debugging |
| ambiguous product, architecture, contract, cross-module behavior | brainstorming |
| approved spec, stable requirements, implementation slicing | writing-plans |
| multi-step, compaction-prone, handoff, subagent work | long-task-continuation |
| completion, release, handoff, "is this done?" | verification-before-completion |
Only create docs/aegis/ records when the routed workflow needs persistent
evidence. Goal framing alone does not create project files.
When delegating work, pass a compact packet instead of the full conversation:
SubagentContextPacket:
- Task:
- Goal:
- Stop condition:
- Relevant baseline refs:
- Relevant files:
- Known facts:
- Unknowns:
- Non-goals:
- Expected output:
- Verification expected:
- Must-read excerpts:
- Unsafe assumptions:
The packet reduces repeated file reading, but it does not replace evidence. Subagents should still read the smallest raw file/log/test excerpt needed to verify critical facts.
Do not paste full chat transcripts, full session history, or unbounded logs into the packet. If a fact matters, include a file ref, line/window hint, or compact must-read excerpt.
If the goal changes mid-task, do not silently overwrite it. Record old goal,
new goal, changed scope, new risks, and route through DriftCheckDraft when a
long-task record exists.
还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。
无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。
还没有评论。来写第一条吧。
Use when touching retiring old logic, collapsing duplicate owners, removing fallbacks, or schema/persistence/source-of-truth boundaries; identify opportunities automatically; destructive execution requires explicit confirmation.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use when defining ambiguous or high-complexity new features, product behavior, UI/component design, architecture choices, contract changes, or when grilling/pressure-testing a plan or design. Routine small requests stay on the fast path.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use when the user asks for caveman mode, fewer tokens, brief responses, compressed communication, or otherwise explicitly requests a much shorter answer.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use when facing 2+ independent tasks without a written plan, with no conflicting shared mutable state or sequential dependencies, where parallel delegation beats inline cost; otherwise inline. Planned tasks use subagent-driven-development.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use when the user asks to establish shared project language, or project work exposes a conflicting, renamed, or deprecated domain term that needs active semantic modeling. Routine small tasks stay on the fast path.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use when executing a written implementation plan across sessions or with review checkpoints. Small or single-slice plans stay inline. For same-session independent tasks, use subagent-driven-development instead.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。