Use when touching retiring old logic, collapsing duplicate owners, removing fallbacks, or schema/persistence/source-of-truth boundaries; identify opportunities automatically; destructive execution requires explicit confirmation.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use when starting a turn or checking Aegis skill routing.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
查看安装方法安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。
<SUBAGENT-STOP>Skip for subagents.</SUBAGENT-STOP>
<EXPLICIT-MODE-GATE> If activation mode is explicit and this request did not explicitly invoke Aegis or a named skill, stay on the fast path; do not route to any Aegis skill. Explicit invocation proceeds normally. </EXPLICIT-MODE-GATE> <EXTREMELY-IMPORTANT> You have Aegis. Load explicit/relevant Aegis skill before response/action; otherwise proceed normally. </EXTREMELY-IMPORTANT>Understand the requested object, scope, actions, conditions, and deliverables from the conversation. Complete the authorized task within business constraints and deliver a usable, verifiable result. Project goals guide durable choices; they do not override the user's current scope. Preserve outstanding intent across follow-ups; clarify material ambiguity before dependent action and continue independent authorized work. Do not repeat satisfied approvals.
Judge success by the requested outcome. Execution, parsing, tests, and architecture alignment prove only their covered scope; tests of real acceptance criteria can prove that outcome. Fix the problem class at its owner, preserving neighboring behavior. Report delivered results and remaining gaps honestly; partial work is not complete. These are decision principles, not a new artifact, universal goal-framing route, or completion authority.
Preserve task fidelity through understanding, transformation, execution and delivery: retain decision-relevant meaning and evidence status, checking both omissions and unsupported additions. Authorized summaries, designs and evidence-based corrections are valid. Use existing checkpoints and sufficient current evidence; no extra approval, six-item report or exhaustive trace is required.
ui-ux-governance for UI/UX effects;
retain task ownership and scope.CONTEXT-MAP.md/CONTEXT.md; model semantic conflicts only when found.grill me/grill this plan/审问我/盘问我/拷问我 -> brainstorming (literal/explanatory uses do not); /aegis-goal or Aegis goal: -> goal-framing. Bug, failure, regression, or unexpected behavior routes to systematic-debugging.TaskStartSnapshot, and decides ArchitectureReviewRequired; ceremony alone
never creates a branch/worktree.Trace Digest).references/skill-discipline.md only when route/order/TDD/workspace/
context re-entry/host mapping detail is needed.Contract: only a real fast path emits Route: fast-path and an Aegis Reason Note; a routed skill owns its next-stage contract.
还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。
无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。
还没有评论。来写第一条吧。
Use when touching retiring old logic, collapsing duplicate owners, removing fallbacks, or schema/persistence/source-of-truth boundaries; identify opportunities automatically; destructive execution requires explicit confirmation.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use when defining ambiguous or high-complexity new features, product behavior, UI/component design, architecture choices, contract changes, or when grilling/pressure-testing a plan or design. Routine small requests stay on the fast path.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use when the user asks for caveman mode, fewer tokens, brief responses, compressed communication, or otherwise explicitly requests a much shorter answer.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use when facing 2+ independent tasks without a written plan, with no conflicting shared mutable state or sequential dependencies, where parallel delegation beats inline cost; otherwise inline. Planned tasks use subagent-driven-development.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use when the user asks to establish shared project language, or project work exposes a conflicting, renamed, or deprecated domain term that needs active semantic modeling. Routine small tasks stay on the fast path.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use when executing a written implementation plan across sessions or with review checkpoints. Small or single-slice plans stay inline. For same-session independent tasks, use subagent-driven-development instead.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。