跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

rdd-defect-workflow

Guide an approved defect fix from reproduction on current main through testing and independent validation. Record evidence for each operator workflow, track change size and rollback scope, and apply review records when receipt-driven development is enabled.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

Trigger: RDD, receipt-driven development, review authority, receipt/lineage, correction/recovery, delivery gate/kill switch, bounded review defects. Guide work.

查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Reproducing approved defects before implementation
  • Recording runtime evidence for CLI and lifecycle flows
  • Splitting fixes by cause and rollback scope
  • Preparing a candidate for independent validation

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md3.6 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Activation Contract

Load when the frontmatter trigger terms apply to a defect workflow.

This skill guides public collaboration. It does not grant issue approval, label, review, exception, or merge authority.

Hard Rules

  • Check the user-owned RDD kill switch first. When disabled, do not start receipt reviews or fabricate approval; follow ordinary policy and report disabled/unmanaged.
  • Require an approved issue (status:approved) and clean current main reproduction before implementation. Audit existing PRs for supersession or conflict; stop or narrow stale claims.
  • Group by causal authority invariant. Use one issue and one PR or explicit chain per independent invariant and rollback boundary. Split independent causes; never merge a superseded or conflicting authority line.
  • Inventory every operator flow claimed by the issue or PR, including entry, mode, environment, expectation, and negative controls. Require one truthful black-box bench journey per CLI or lifecycle flow, or actual runtime E2E proof when the core bench cannot represent it. Synthetic proxy coverage never proves another runtime.
  • Use CodeGraph-first impact mapping, a dedicated worktree, and behavior-first tests. Run source-mutating normalization before candidate freeze.
  • Forecast authored changes before edits. The hard limit is 400 additions plus deletions; above it, STOP for a chain or explicit maintainer-approved exception.
  • Only when RDD is enabled, bind the review candidate identity, lineage, correction, and recovery records exactly. Keep bounded review defects in one correction transaction; ordinary repository policy decides delivery.
  • Require independent read-only candidate validation before publication. Validation cannot edit source or authority; findings require a new candidate.
  • Keep communication humane and evidence-based. Repository labels and workflow metadata are maintainer-owned, never evidence of contributor blame.

Decision Gates

ConditionAction
RDD disabledOrdinary policy; disabled/unmanaged; no receipt or approval claim.
Issue gate or reproduction failsWait, stop, or narrow with evidence.
Invariant or rollback is independentSeparate issue and authoritative PR line.
Core bench fits / does not fitBench journey / actual runtime E2E; never proxy.
Forecast exceeds 400 linesChain or approved exception before edits.

Execution Steps

  1. Check mode, approval, PR conflicts, and current-main reproduction.
  2. Name invariant and rollback; isolate the worktree; CodeGraph-map code, tests, evidence, docs, distribution, and registration.
  3. Inventory flows and controls; add failing tests and the smallest correction.
  4. Normalize, enforce budget, run tests, and record each flow's exact candidate, command, scenario, and result.
  5. Freeze, validate read-only, and give the verdict, evidence, and one humane next action.

Output Contract

Return rdd_mode, issue_pr, causal_invariant, operator_flows, journey_runtime_evidence, changed_line_budget, tests, rollback, and unresolved_authority_decisions.

Identify approved and superseded/conflicting authority lines; every flow, negative control, and candidate-bound proof; additions plus deletions and chain/exception; test results; independent rollback; and unresolved maintainer decisions.

References

No supporting files. Current repository policy remains authoritative.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

branch-pr

免费

Prepare pull requests by checking approved issue links, change-type labels, and required automated checks. Draft the repository’s PR template using observed test results, while leaving commits, pushes, PR creation, and merging under human control.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Preparing a branch for review
  • Drafting a PR linked to an approved issue
  • Checking required CI before declaring a PR merge-ready
Gentleman-Programming/gentle-ai78562026年10月18日 更新

Split changes exceeding 400 lines into linked pull requests with clear boundaries and dependencies. Choose a chain structure, keep tests and documentation with each work unit, and document review order, verification plans, and justified size exceptions.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Splitting a change that exceeds 400 lines
  • Planning PRs that can merge independently
  • Coordinating a feature through a draft tracker PR
Gentleman-Programming/gentle-ai78562026年10月18日 更新

Structure guides, READMEs, design documents, and pull request descriptions so readers can find answers quickly. Put outcomes first, introduce details gradually, and use examples, tables, and checklists to support understanding and review.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Reorganizing a long or dense README
  • Writing an onboarding guide for new contributors
  • Making a pull request's review steps clear
Gentleman-Programming/gentle-ai78562026年10月18日 更新

Draft clear, considerate comments for code reviews, issue replies, and team updates. Put the actionable point first, explain technical reasons when needed, and give a concrete next step while matching the conversation’s language.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Requesting a code change with a clear reason
  • Replying to a contributor’s issue
  • Writing a brief asynchronous team update
Gentleman-Programming/gentle-ai78562026年10月18日 更新

Create and verify gentle-ai journeys, which are scripted sequences of product actions. Check their declarations separately from actual execution, review outdated expectations after behavior changes, and record execution results for pull requests.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Adding a product operation journey
  • Updating expectations after behavior changes
  • Reproducing a bench failure from CI
Gentleman-Programming/gentle-ai78562026年10月18日 更新

Prepare Gentle AI changes for review by linking approved issues, following branch and commit naming rules, and drafting pull requests with observed test results. Check change size and required automated checks before claiming readiness.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Preparing a branch for a fix or feature
  • Drafting a pull request linked to an approved issue
  • Organizing test results and reviewer notes
Gentleman-Programming/gentle-ai78562026年10月18日 更新

查看 Gentleman-Programming 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题