跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

ai-team-orchestration

Coordinate a small AI development team with planning, implementation, and optional independent testing roles. Adapt the process to the work’s complexity, prepare pull requests, and preserve decisions and next steps so later sessions can continue.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

Bootstrap and run a lightweight multi-agent development team. Use when starting or adopting a project, planning work, coordinating implementation and optional QA, brainstorming with distinct perspectives, or preserving context across sessions.

查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Starting development or taking over an existing project
  • Coordinating implementation and independent testing
  • Comparing perspectives on product or architecture decisions
  • Preserving decisions and next steps across sessions

包含的文件(5)

  • SKILL.md3.9 KB
  • references/anti-patterns.md2.5 KB
  • references/brainstorm-format.md3.9 KB
  • references/project-brief-template.md1.9 KB
  • references/sprint-plan-template.md2.3 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

AI Team Orchestration

Use three stable agents:

AgentPurpose
@ai-team-producerClarify scope, plan proportionately, coordinate, and merge
@ai-team-devImplement, test, self-review, and prepare the pull request
@ai-team-qaIndependently test behavior when dedicated QA is useful

Nova, Sage, and Milo are perspectives inside the Dev agent, not mandatory project layers.

Default Workflow

Plan -> Implement -> Test -> optional review or QA -> Merge -> update project state

Keep the workflow proportional:

  • Skip formal planning for small, obvious changes.
  • Use a short plan for multi-step or cross-cutting work.
  • Add independent review or QA when risk, uncertainty, or repository policy justifies it.
  • Let branch protection, required checks, permissions, and merge queues enforce repository merge policy.

Start or Adopt a Project

  1. Read existing repository instructions and documentation.
  2. Discover the actual stack, architecture, commands, deployment model, and risks.
  3. Create or update PROJECT_BRIEF.md only when durable cross-session context is useful. Start from the project brief template and omit irrelevant sections.
  4. For substantial work, create a concise plan from the sprint plan template.
  5. Use a separate branch or clone when parallel sessions could conflict, following the repository's own Git policy.

Execute

Producer

  • Define the outcome, constraints, acceptance criteria, and explicit exclusions.
  • Choose review and QA based on risk rather than ceremony.
  • Keep durable project state concise and current.

Dev

  • Follow repository conventions and implement the smallest complete solution.
  • Run relevant checks and inspect the final diff.
  • Open or update the pull request with summary, verification, and limitations.

QA

  • Use only when dedicated behavioral verification adds value.
  • Test the requested change and important regressions.
  • Report reproducible findings and verify fixes.

Brainstorms

Use the brainstorm format for product or architecture decisions that benefit from competing perspectives. For ordinary implementation choices, let Dev decide using repository conventions.

Context Recovery

Before ending a long or interrupted session:

  1. Update the active plan or progress note if one exists.
  2. Record material decisions, blockers, and the next action in repository context.
  3. Use a cold-start prompt such as:
Read the repository instructions, then read whichever sources exist for this
work: the active issue or request, PROJECT_BRIEF.md, and the active plan or
progress note.
Continue from the recorded next action.

Tool and Model Inheritance

The bundled agents intentionally omit tools and model frontmatter:

  • available built-in, MCP, and extension tools remain usable;
  • developers keep control of model selection;
  • role boundaries are defined by instructions and normal trust, permission, authentication, and approval controls.

If the environment exposes too many tools, deselect irrelevant tools or MCP servers, or use VS Code virtual-tool management. Do not add a machine-specific plugin allowlist.

Principles

  • Prefer working software and clear handoffs over process artifacts.
  • Follow repository policy instead of embedding universal Git commands.
  • Preserve unknown work and ask before destructive or privileged actions.
  • Keep bugs and important decisions in durable project systems, not only chat.
  • See anti-patterns for concise lessons.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Map an existing codebase into seven documents covering its technology, structure, architecture, conventions, integrations, tests, and concerns. Link findings to file evidence, mark unknowns, and highlight differences between stated plans and the actual implementation.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Get oriented in an unfamiliar codebase
  • Prepare documentation for a project handover
  • Compare documented architecture with implementation
github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月20日 更新

Assess a repository’s readiness for AI agents with AgentRC and generate a standalone HTML dashboard. Review scores across nine areas, see prioritized improvements, and optionally apply scoring policies tailored to an organization.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Assessing a repository’s readiness for AI agents
  • Prioritizing improvements from assessment results
  • Reviewing scores under an organization’s own policy
github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月20日 更新

Generate coding agent instruction files from a project's actual code using AgentRC. Capture detected languages, frameworks, and conventions in one shared file or split rules by topic and project area, with a preview before writing.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Create project instructions for VS Code Copilot
  • Refresh agent rules after project changes
  • Split monorepo instructions by project area
github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月20日 更新

Customize AgentRC readiness assessments to match team or organization standards. Choose or create policies that adjust check importance, disable irrelevant checks, set pass thresholds, and define requirements for automated checks in CI workflows.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Set shared readiness standards across an organization
  • Focus assessments on AI tooling
  • Adjust the importance of individual checks
github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月20日 更新

Analyze supplied ad performance data to identify wasted spend, strong campaigns, and next tests. Compare channels, assess whether test differences are meaningful, and produce budget reallocation recommendations with a prioritized action plan.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Identify ads and keywords to pause
  • Find campaigns and audiences worth scaling
  • Assess whether A/B test results are meaningful
github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月20日 更新

Turn code files into learning resources by adding comments that explain syntax, programming concepts, and design choices. Adjust explanation depth and repetition to the reader’s knowledge while preserving file structure, encoding, and syntax.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Add beginner-friendly explanations to existing code
  • Document the reasoning behind syntax and design choices
  • Adjust comment depth for readers with different experience
github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月20日 更新

查看 github 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题