跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

bug-receipt

Document bug fixes and incident recovery with a structured receipt covering the problem, cause, change, and verification evidence. Distinguishes verified results from partial or blocked work, identifies missing proof, and specifies the next check needed to close the gap.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

Close defects and incidents with a BUG RECEIPT and VERIFIED, PARTIAL, or BLOCKED status after diagnosis, repair, or recovery.

查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Record the evidence supporting a bug fix
  • Report missing checks after a partial repair
  • Document an incident blocked by an external condition
  • Produce a machine-readable receipt for CI

包含的文件(5)

  • SKILL.md4.3 KB
  • assets/receipt.template.json573 B
  • references/receipt-contract.md1.8 KB
  • references/receipt.schema.json3.5 KB
  • scripts/validate-receipt.mjs7.7 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Bug Receipt

Mandatory closeout output

For every bug or incident closeout decision, return the complete receipt below as the entire user-facing result, even when the user requests a concise reply or does not name this format. Concision shortens field values; it never removes or renames a row. Do not replace the receipt with prose.

BUG RECEIPT · VERIFIED | PARTIAL | BLOCKED

Problem    <observed defect and intended behavior>
Baseline   <failing interaction or command and decisive result; or not run>
Root cause <proven mechanism; or unproven hypothesis>
Change     <responsible change; or none>
Proof      <supplied or executed check: result; include every decisive layer>
Gaps       <none; or exact missing proof and single next experiment/package>
Source     executed now | supplied | mixed

Use not run, unproven, or none explicitly. Never omit a row to make the receipt look complete.

Establish the evidence boundary

Before editing, record the observed problem, intended behavior, strongest direct check, and evidence source: executed now, supplied, or mixed. Never imply that supplied evidence was executed in the current run.

Keep evidence privacy-minimal. Redact credentials, tokens, cookies, personal data, private URLs, and sensitive payloads; preserve only the identifiers and excerpts needed to reproduce or correlate the failure.

Reproduce the failure with the narrowest safe check when possible. If reproduction is unavailable, preserve the evidence obtained and cap the result at PARTIAL or BLOCKED.

Trace and repair

  1. Follow the live owner path from input to symptom.
  2. Separate observed facts, bounded inferences, and gaps.
  3. Require a concrete location or runtime transition before naming root cause.
  4. Make the smallest responsible change; avoid unrelated cleanup, retries, silent fallbacks, and fixture-specific exceptions.

Do not convert a plausible patch, stale log, source read, or passing build into proof of the user-visible behavior.

Close the proof loop

Run only checks required by the affected contract:

  • original reproduction or direct acceptance check;
  • nearest negative or regression check;
  • affected build or integration gate;
  • real UI, API, persistence, concurrency, or runtime path when the claim crosses that boundary.

Use these decisive boundaries:

SurfaceRequired direct proof
Logic or failing testOriginal failing input or focused test now passes
UI behaviorReal interaction plus relevant console and network observation
API or integrationRequest, response, and responsible service behavior
PersistenceWrite/read or reload round trip through the real owner path
Race or lifecycleRepeated concurrent trigger; zero-or-one success; affected-row and transaction evidence; final invariant
Cross-system blockerOne sanitized failing request/response with timestamp or request ID, edge and application logs, and identity-provider logs when the trace reaches that owner

Assign status

  • VERIFIED: observed baseline, concrete cause, responsible change, all declared checks passed, no material gap.
  • PARTIAL: useful evidence exists, but a required proof layer is missing or inconclusive.
  • BLOCKED: a specific external condition prevents reproduction, repair, or proof.

For PARTIAL or BLOCKED, name the single minimal experiment or correlated evidence package that closes the decisive gap. Never invent a command, observation, count, location, or result.

For a machine-readable receipt or CI integration, read references/receipt-contract.md and conform to its JSON fields, evidence-source marker, compatibility rule, and status invariants.

When a JSON artifact is requested, start from assets/receipt.template.json, write it to a task-owned path, and validate it with node scripts/validate-receipt.mjs <receipt.json> from this skill directory. Do not commit the generated receipt unless the user requests it.

Source and license

Originally published at https://github.com/lMysticl/bug-receipt under the MIT License.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Map an existing codebase into seven documents covering its technology, structure, architecture, conventions, integrations, tests, and concerns. Link findings to file evidence, mark unknowns, and highlight differences between stated plans and the actual implementation.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Get oriented in an unfamiliar codebase
  • Prepare documentation for a project handover
  • Compare documented architecture with implementation
github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月20日 更新

Assess a repository’s readiness for AI agents with AgentRC and generate a standalone HTML dashboard. Review scores across nine areas, see prioritized improvements, and optionally apply scoring policies tailored to an organization.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Assessing a repository’s readiness for AI agents
  • Prioritizing improvements from assessment results
  • Reviewing scores under an organization’s own policy
github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月20日 更新

Generate coding agent instruction files from a project's actual code using AgentRC. Capture detected languages, frameworks, and conventions in one shared file or split rules by topic and project area, with a preview before writing.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Create project instructions for VS Code Copilot
  • Refresh agent rules after project changes
  • Split monorepo instructions by project area
github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月20日 更新

Customize AgentRC readiness assessments to match team or organization standards. Choose or create policies that adjust check importance, disable irrelevant checks, set pass thresholds, and define requirements for automated checks in CI workflows.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Set shared readiness standards across an organization
  • Focus assessments on AI tooling
  • Adjust the importance of individual checks
github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月20日 更新

Analyze supplied ad performance data to identify wasted spend, strong campaigns, and next tests. Compare channels, assess whether test differences are meaningful, and produce budget reallocation recommendations with a prioritized action plan.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Identify ads and keywords to pause
  • Find campaigns and audiences worth scaling
  • Assess whether A/B test results are meaningful
github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月20日 更新

Turn code files into learning resources by adding comments that explain syntax, programming concepts, and design choices. Adjust explanation depth and repetition to the reader’s knowledge while preserving file structure, encoding, and syntax.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Add beginner-friendly explanations to existing code
  • Document the reasoning behind syntax and design choices
  • Adjust comment depth for readers with different experience
github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月20日 更新

查看 github 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题