跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

create-github-action-workflow-specification

Turn an existing GitHub Actions workflow into a structured specification for maintenance and AI reference. Document its purpose, triggers, job dependencies, inputs, outputs, permissions, and failure handling, focusing on expected behavior rather than implementation details.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

Create a formal specification for an existing GitHub Actions CI/CD workflow, optimized for AI consumption and workflow maintenance.

集成工具GitHub
查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Documenting an existing GitHub Actions workflow
  • Reviewing job order and dependencies
  • Organizing permissions and failure handling
  • Preparing a specification for future workflow changes

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md7.5 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Create GitHub Actions Workflow Specification

Create a comprehensive specification for the GitHub Actions workflow: ${input:WorkflowFile}.

This specification serves as a specification for the workflow's behavior, requirements, and constraints. It must be implementation-agnostic, focusing on what the workflow accomplishes rather than how it's implemented.

AI-Optimized Requirements

  • Token Efficiency: Use concise language without sacrificing clarity
  • Structured Data: Leverage tables, lists, and diagrams for dense information
  • Semantic Clarity: Use precise terminology consistently throughout
  • Implementation Abstraction: Avoid specific syntax, commands, or tool versions
  • Maintainability: Design for easy updates as workflow evolves

Specification Template

Save as: /spec/spec-process-cicd-[workflow-name].md

---
title: CI/CD Workflow Specification - [Workflow Name]
version: 1.0
date_created: [YYYY-MM-DD]
last_updated: [YYYY-MM-DD]
owner: DevOps Team
tags: [process, cicd, github-actions, automation, [domain-specific-tags]]
---

## Workflow Overview

**Purpose**: [One sentence describing workflow's primary goal]
**Trigger Events**: [List trigger conditions]
**Target Environments**: [Environment scope]

## Execution Flow Diagram

```mermaid
graph TD
    A[Trigger Event] --> B[Job 1]
    B --> C[Job 2]
    C --> D[Job 3]
    D --> E[End]
    
    B --> F[Parallel Job]
    F --> D
    
    style A fill:#e1f5fe
    style E fill:#e8f5e8

Jobs & Dependencies

Job NamePurposeDependenciesExecution Context
job-1[Purpose][Prerequisites][Runner/Environment]
job-2[Purpose]job-1[Runner/Environment]

Requirements Matrix

Functional Requirements

IDRequirementPriorityAcceptance Criteria
REQ-001[Requirement]High[Testable criteria]
REQ-002[Requirement]Medium[Testable criteria]

Security Requirements

IDRequirementImplementation Constraint
SEC-001[Security requirement][Constraint description]

Performance Requirements

IDMetricTargetMeasurement Method
PERF-001[Metric][Target value][How measured]

Input/Output Contracts

Inputs

# Environment Variables
ENV_VAR_1: string  # Purpose: [description]
ENV_VAR_2: secret  # Purpose: [description]

# Repository Triggers
paths: [list of path filters]
branches: [list of branch patterns]

Outputs

# Job Outputs
job_1_output: string  # Description: [purpose]
build_artifact: file  # Description: [content type]

Secrets & Variables

TypeNamePurposeScope
SecretSECRET_1[Purpose]Workflow
VariableVAR_1[Purpose]Repository

Execution Constraints

Runtime Constraints

  • Timeout: [Maximum execution time]
  • Concurrency: [Parallel execution limits]
  • Resource Limits: [Memory/CPU constraints]

Environmental Constraints

  • Runner Requirements: [OS/hardware needs]
  • Network Access: [External connectivity needs]
  • Permissions: [Required access levels]

Error Handling Strategy

Error TypeResponseRecovery Action
Build Failure[Response][Recovery steps]
Test Failure[Response][Recovery steps]
Deployment Failure[Response][Recovery steps]

Quality Gates

Gate Definitions

GateCriteriaBypass Conditions
Code Quality[Standards][When allowed]
Security Scan[Thresholds][When allowed]
Test Coverage[Percentage][When allowed]

Monitoring & Observability

Key Metrics

  • Success Rate: [Target percentage]
  • Execution Time: [Target duration]
  • Resource Usage: [Monitoring approach]

Alerting

ConditionSeverityNotification Target
[Condition][Level][Who/Where]

Integration Points

External Systems

SystemIntegration TypeData ExchangeSLA Requirements
[System][Type][Data format][Requirements]

Dependent Workflows

WorkflowRelationshipTrigger Mechanism
[Workflow][Type][How triggered]

Compliance & Governance

Audit Requirements

  • Execution Logs: [Retention policy]
  • Approval Gates: [Required approvals]
  • Change Control: [Update process]

Security Controls

  • Access Control: [Permission model]
  • Secret Management: [Rotation policy]
  • Vulnerability Scanning: [Scan frequency]

Edge Cases & Exceptions

Scenario Matrix

ScenarioExpected BehaviorValidation Method
[Edge case][Behavior][How to verify]

Validation Criteria

Workflow Validation

  • VLD-001: [Validation rule]
  • VLD-002: [Validation rule]

Performance Benchmarks

  • PERF-001: [Benchmark criteria]
  • PERF-002: [Benchmark criteria]

Change Management

Update Process

  1. Specification Update: Modify this document first
  2. Review & Approval: [Approval process]
  3. Implementation: Apply changes to workflow
  4. Testing: [Validation approach]
  5. Deployment: [Release process]

Version History

VersionDateChangesAuthor
1.0[Date]Initial specification[Author]

Related Specifications

  • [Link to related workflow specs]
  • [Link to infrastructure specs]
  • [Link to deployment specs]

## Analysis Instructions

When analyzing the workflow file:

1. **Extract Core Purpose**: Identify the primary business objective
2. **Map Job Flow**: Create dependency graph showing execution order
3. **Identify Contracts**: Document inputs, outputs, and interfaces
4. **Capture Constraints**: Extract timeouts, permissions, and limits
5. **Define Quality Gates**: Identify validation and approval points
6. **Document Error Paths**: Map failure scenarios and recovery
7. **Abstract Implementation**: Focus on behavior, not syntax

## Mermaid Diagram Guidelines

### Flow Types
- **Sequential**: `A --> B --> C`
- **Parallel**: `A --> B & A --> C; B --> D & C --> D`
- **Conditional**: `A --> B{Decision}; B -->|Yes| C; B -->|No| D`

### Styling
```mermaid
style TriggerNode fill:#e1f5fe
style SuccessNode fill:#e8f5e8
style FailureNode fill:#ffebee
style ProcessNode fill:#f3e5f5

Complex Workflows

For workflows with 5+ jobs, use subgraphs:

graph TD
    subgraph "Build Phase"
        A[Lint] --> B[Test] --> C[Build]
    end
    subgraph "Deploy Phase"  
        D[Staging] --> E[Production]
    end
    C --> D

Token Optimization Strategies

  1. Use Tables: Dense information in structured format
  2. Abbreviate Consistently: Define once, use throughout
  3. Bullet Points: Avoid prose paragraphs
  4. Code Blocks: Structured data over narrative
  5. Cross-Reference: Link instead of repeat information

Focus on creating a specification that serves as both documentation and a template for workflow updates.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Map an existing codebase into seven documents covering its technology, structure, architecture, conventions, integrations, tests, and concerns. Link findings to file evidence, mark unknowns, and highlight differences between stated plans and the actual implementation.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Get oriented in an unfamiliar codebase
  • Prepare documentation for a project handover
  • Compare documented architecture with implementation
github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月17日 更新

Assess a repository’s readiness for AI agents with AgentRC and generate a standalone HTML dashboard. Review scores across nine areas, see prioritized improvements, and optionally apply scoring policies tailored to an organization.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Assessing a repository’s readiness for AI agents
  • Prioritizing improvements from assessment results
  • Reviewing scores under an organization’s own policy
github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月17日 更新

Generate coding agent instruction files from a project's actual code using AgentRC. Capture detected languages, frameworks, and conventions in one shared file or split rules by topic and project area, with a preview before writing.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Create project instructions for VS Code Copilot
  • Refresh agent rules after project changes
  • Split monorepo instructions by project area
github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月17日 更新

Customize AgentRC readiness assessments to match team or organization standards. Choose or create policies that adjust check importance, disable irrelevant checks, set pass thresholds, and define requirements for automated checks in CI workflows.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Set shared readiness standards across an organization
  • Focus assessments on AI tooling
  • Adjust the importance of individual checks
github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月17日 更新

Analyze supplied ad performance data to identify wasted spend, strong campaigns, and next tests. Compare channels, assess whether test differences are meaningful, and produce budget reallocation recommendations with a prioritized action plan.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Identify ads and keywords to pause
  • Find campaigns and audiences worth scaling
  • Assess whether A/B test results are meaningful
github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月17日 更新

Turn code files into learning resources by adding comments that explain syntax, programming concepts, and design choices. Adjust explanation depth and repetition to the reader’s knowledge while preserving file structure, encoding, and syntax.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Add beginner-friendly explanations to existing code
  • Document the reasoning behind syntax and design choices
  • Adjust comment depth for readers with different experience
github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月17日 更新

查看 github 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题