跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

create-technical-spike

Create Markdown documents for time-limited technical investigations before implementation. Define the decision to resolve, research tasks, success criteria, and deadlines, then record evidence, recommendations, and follow-up actions in a consistent structure.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

Create time-boxed technical spike documents for researching and resolving critical development decisions before implementation.

查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Investigating API capabilities before integration
  • Comparing architecture options before implementation
  • Planning experiments to check performance assumptions
  • Sharing technical decisions and supporting evidence

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md6.4 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Create Technical Spike Document

Create time-boxed technical spike documents for researching critical questions that must be answered before development can proceed. Each spike focuses on a specific technical decision with clear deliverables and timelines.

Document Structure

Create individual files in ${input:FolderPath|docs/spikes} directory. Name each file using the pattern: [category]-[short-description]-spike.md (e.g., api-copilot-integration-spike.md, performance-realtime-audio-spike.md).

---
title: "${input:SpikeTitle}"
category: "${input:Category|Technical}"
status: "🔴 Not Started"
priority: "${input:Priority|High}"
timebox: "${input:Timebox|1 week}"
created: [YYYY-MM-DD]
updated: [YYYY-MM-DD]
owner: "${input:Owner}"
tags: ["technical-spike", "${input:Category|technical}", "research"]
---

# ${input:SpikeTitle}

## Summary

**Spike Objective:** [Clear, specific question or decision that needs resolution]

**Why This Matters:** [Impact on development/architecture decisions]

**Timebox:** [How much time allocated to this spike]

**Decision Deadline:** [When this must be resolved to avoid blocking development]

## Research Question(s)

**Primary Question:** [Main technical question that needs answering]

**Secondary Questions:**

- [Related question 1]
- [Related question 2]
- [Related question 3]

## Investigation Plan

### Research Tasks

- [ ] [Specific research task 1]
- [ ] [Specific research task 2]
- [ ] [Specific research task 3]
- [ ] [Create proof of concept/prototype]
- [ ] [Document findings and recommendations]

### Success Criteria

**This spike is complete when:**

- [ ] [Specific criteria 1]
- [ ] [Specific criteria 2]
- [ ] [Clear recommendation documented]
- [ ] [Proof of concept completed (if applicable)]

## Technical Context

**Related Components:** [List system components affected by this decision]

**Dependencies:** [What other spikes or decisions depend on resolving this]

**Constraints:** [Known limitations or requirements that affect the solution]

## Research Findings

### Investigation Results

[Document research findings, test results, and evidence gathered]

### Prototype/Testing Notes

[Results from any prototypes, spikes, or technical experiments]

### External Resources

- [Link to relevant documentation]
- [Link to API references]
- [Link to community discussions]
- [Link to examples/tutorials]

## Decision

### Recommendation

[Clear recommendation based on research findings]

### Rationale

[Why this approach was chosen over alternatives]

### Implementation Notes

[Key considerations for implementation]

### Follow-up Actions

- [ ] [Action item 1]
- [ ] [Action item 2]
- [ ] [Update architecture documents]
- [ ] [Create implementation tasks]

## Status History

| Date   | Status         | Notes                      |
| ------ | -------------- | -------------------------- |
| [Date] | 🔴 Not Started | Spike created and scoped   |
| [Date] | 🟡 In Progress | Research commenced         |
| [Date] | 🟢 Complete    | [Resolution summary]       |

---

_Last updated: [Date] by [Name]_

Categories for Technical Spikes

API Integration

  • Third-party API capabilities and limitations
  • Integration patterns and authentication
  • Rate limits and performance characteristics

Architecture & Design

  • System architecture decisions
  • Design pattern applicability
  • Component interaction models

Performance & Scalability

  • Performance requirements and constraints
  • Scalability bottlenecks and solutions
  • Resource utilization patterns

Platform & Infrastructure

  • Platform capabilities and limitations
  • Infrastructure requirements
  • Deployment and hosting considerations

Security & Compliance

  • Security requirements and implementations
  • Compliance constraints
  • Authentication and authorization approaches

User Experience

  • User interaction patterns
  • Accessibility requirements
  • Interface design decisions

File Naming Conventions

Use descriptive, kebab-case names that indicate the category and specific unknown:

API/Integration Examples:

  • api-copilot-chat-integration-spike.md
  • api-azure-speech-realtime-spike.md
  • api-vscode-extension-capabilities-spike.md

Performance Examples:

  • performance-audio-processing-latency-spike.md
  • performance-extension-host-limitations-spike.md
  • performance-webrtc-reliability-spike.md

Architecture Examples:

  • architecture-voice-pipeline-design-spike.md
  • architecture-state-management-spike.md
  • architecture-error-handling-strategy-spike.md

Best Practices for AI Agents

  1. One Question Per Spike: Each document focuses on a single technical decision or research question

  2. Time-Boxed Research: Define specific time limits and deliverables for each spike

  3. Evidence-Based Decisions: Require concrete evidence (tests, prototypes, documentation) before marking as complete

  4. Clear Recommendations: Document specific recommendations and rationale for implementation

  5. Dependency Tracking: Identify how spikes relate to each other and impact project decisions

  6. Outcome-Focused: Every spike must result in an actionable decision or recommendation

Research Strategy

Phase 1: Information Gathering

  1. Search existing documentation using search/fetch tools
  2. Analyze codebase for existing patterns and constraints
  3. Research external resources (APIs, libraries, examples)

Phase 2: Validation & Testing

  1. Create focused prototypes to test specific hypotheses
  2. Run targeted experiments to validate assumptions
  3. Document test results with supporting evidence

Phase 3: Decision & Documentation

  1. Synthesize findings into clear recommendations
  2. Document implementation guidance for development team
  3. Create follow-up tasks for implementation

Tools Usage

  • search/searchResults: Research existing solutions and documentation
  • fetch/githubRepo: Analyze external APIs, libraries, and examples
  • codebase: Understand existing system constraints and patterns
  • runTasks: Execute prototypes and validation tests
  • editFiles: Update research progress and findings
  • vscodeAPI: Test VS Code extension capabilities and limitations

Focus on time-boxed research that resolves critical technical decisions and unblocks development progress.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Map an existing codebase into seven documents covering its technology, structure, architecture, conventions, integrations, tests, and concerns. Link findings to file evidence, mark unknowns, and highlight differences between stated plans and the actual implementation.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Get oriented in an unfamiliar codebase
  • Prepare documentation for a project handover
  • Compare documented architecture with implementation
github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月20日 更新

Assess a repository’s readiness for AI agents with AgentRC and generate a standalone HTML dashboard. Review scores across nine areas, see prioritized improvements, and optionally apply scoring policies tailored to an organization.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Assessing a repository’s readiness for AI agents
  • Prioritizing improvements from assessment results
  • Reviewing scores under an organization’s own policy
github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月20日 更新

Generate coding agent instruction files from a project's actual code using AgentRC. Capture detected languages, frameworks, and conventions in one shared file or split rules by topic and project area, with a preview before writing.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Create project instructions for VS Code Copilot
  • Refresh agent rules after project changes
  • Split monorepo instructions by project area
github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月20日 更新

Customize AgentRC readiness assessments to match team or organization standards. Choose or create policies that adjust check importance, disable irrelevant checks, set pass thresholds, and define requirements for automated checks in CI workflows.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Set shared readiness standards across an organization
  • Focus assessments on AI tooling
  • Adjust the importance of individual checks
github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月20日 更新

Analyze supplied ad performance data to identify wasted spend, strong campaigns, and next tests. Compare channels, assess whether test differences are meaningful, and produce budget reallocation recommendations with a prioritized action plan.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Identify ads and keywords to pause
  • Find campaigns and audiences worth scaling
  • Assess whether A/B test results are meaningful
github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月20日 更新

Turn code files into learning resources by adding comments that explain syntax, programming concepts, and design choices. Adjust explanation depth and repetition to the reader’s knowledge while preserving file structure, encoding, and syntax.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Add beginner-friendly explanations to existing code
  • Document the reasoning behind syntax and design choices
  • Adjust comment depth for readers with different experience
github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月20日 更新

查看 github 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题