跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

csharp-mstest

Write and improve C# unit tests with MSTest 3.x/4.x. Covers assertions that check expected results, tests with multiple input sets, asynchronous setup, cleanup, and test organization, with guidance on APIs that differ between versions.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

Get best practices for MSTest 3.x/4.x unit testing, including modern assertion APIs and data-driven tests

查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Create a C# unit test project
  • Test multiple input sets with DataRow or DynamicData
  • Update exception checks to modern assertion APIs
  • Organize asynchronous test setup and cleanup

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md13.5 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

MSTest Best Practices (MSTest 3.x/4.x)

Your goal is to help me write effective unit tests with modern MSTest, using current APIs and best practices.

Project Setup

  • Use a separate test project with naming convention [ProjectName].Tests
  • Reference MSTest 3.x+ NuGet packages (includes analyzers)
  • Consider using MSTest.Sdk for simplified project setup
  • Run tests with dotnet test

Test Class Structure

  • Use [TestClass] attribute for test classes
  • Seal test classes by default for performance and design clarity
  • Use [TestMethod] for test methods (prefer over [DataTestMethod])
  • Follow Arrange-Act-Assert (AAA) pattern
  • Name tests using pattern MethodName_Scenario_ExpectedBehavior
[TestClass]
public sealed class CalculatorTests
{
    [TestMethod]
    public void Add_TwoPositiveNumbers_ReturnsSum()
    {
        // Arrange
        var calculator = new Calculator();

        // Act
        var result = calculator.Add(2, 3);

        // Assert
        Assert.AreEqual(5, result);
    }
}

Test Lifecycle

  • Prefer constructors over [TestInitialize] - enables readonly fields and follows standard C# patterns
  • Use [TestCleanup] for cleanup that must run even if test fails
  • Combine constructor with async [TestInitialize] when async setup is needed
[TestClass]
public sealed class ServiceTests
{
    private readonly MyService _service;  // readonly enabled by constructor

    public ServiceTests()
    {
        _service = new MyService();
    }

    [TestInitialize]
    public async Task InitAsync()
    {
        // Use for async initialization only
        await _service.WarmupAsync();
    }

    [TestCleanup]
    public void Cleanup() => _service.Reset();
}

Execution Order

  1. Assembly Initialization - [AssemblyInitialize] (once per test assembly)
  2. Class Initialization - [ClassInitialize] (once per test class)
  3. Test Initialization (for every test method):
    1. Constructor
    2. Set TestContext property
    3. [TestInitialize]
  4. Test Execution - test method runs
  5. Test Cleanup (for every test method):
    1. [TestCleanup]
    2. DisposeAsync (if implemented)
    3. Dispose (if implemented)
  6. Class Cleanup - [ClassCleanup] (once per test class)
  7. Assembly Cleanup - [AssemblyCleanup] (once per test assembly)

Modern Assertion APIs

MSTest provides three assertion classes: Assert, StringAssert, and CollectionAssert.

Assert Class - Core Assertions

// Equality
Assert.AreEqual(expected, actual);
Assert.AreNotEqual(notExpected, actual);
Assert.AreSame(expectedObject, actualObject);      // Reference equality
Assert.AreNotSame(notExpectedObject, actualObject);

// Null checks
Assert.IsNull(value);
Assert.IsNotNull(value);

// Boolean
Assert.IsTrue(condition);
Assert.IsFalse(condition);

// Fail/Inconclusive
Assert.Fail("Test failed due to...");
Assert.Inconclusive("Test cannot be completed because...");

Exception Testing (Prefer over [ExpectedException])

// Assert.Throws - matches TException or derived types
var ex = Assert.Throws<ArgumentException>(() => Method(null));
Assert.AreEqual("Value cannot be null.", ex.Message);

// Assert.ThrowsExactly - matches exact type only
var ex = Assert.ThrowsExactly<InvalidOperationException>(() => Method());

// Async versions
var ex = await Assert.ThrowsAsync<HttpRequestException>(async () => await client.GetAsync(url));
var ex = await Assert.ThrowsExactlyAsync<InvalidOperationException>(async () => await Method());

Collection Assertions (Assert class)

Assert.Contains(expectedItem, collection);
Assert.DoesNotContain(unexpectedItem, collection);
Assert.ContainsSingle(collection);  // exactly one element
Assert.HasCount(5, collection);
Assert.IsEmpty(collection);
Assert.IsNotEmpty(collection);

String Assertions (Assert class)

Assert.Contains("expected", actualString);
Assert.StartsWith("prefix", actualString);
Assert.EndsWith("suffix", actualString);
Assert.DoesNotStartWith("prefix", actualString);
Assert.DoesNotEndWith("suffix", actualString);
Assert.MatchesRegex(@"\d{3}-\d{4}", phoneNumber);
Assert.DoesNotMatchRegex(@"\d+", textOnly);

Comparison Assertions

Assert.IsGreaterThan(lowerBound, actual);
Assert.IsGreaterThanOrEqualTo(lowerBound, actual);
Assert.IsLessThan(upperBound, actual);
Assert.IsLessThanOrEqualTo(upperBound, actual);
Assert.IsInRange(actual, low, high);
Assert.IsPositive(number);
Assert.IsNegative(number);

Type Assertions

// MSTest 3.x - uses out parameter
Assert.IsInstanceOfType<MyClass>(obj, out var typed);
typed.DoSomething();

// MSTest 4.x - returns typed result directly
var typed = Assert.IsInstanceOfType<MyClass>(obj);
typed.DoSomething();

Assert.IsNotInstanceOfType<WrongType>(obj);

Assert.That (MSTest 4.0+)

Assert.That(result.Count > 0);  // Auto-captures expression in failure message

StringAssert Class

Note: Prefer Assert class equivalents when available (e.g., Assert.Contains("expected", actual) over StringAssert.Contains(actual, "expected")).

StringAssert.Contains(actualString, "expected");
StringAssert.StartsWith(actualString, "prefix");
StringAssert.EndsWith(actualString, "suffix");
StringAssert.Matches(actualString, new Regex(@"\d{3}-\d{4}"));
StringAssert.DoesNotMatch(actualString, new Regex(@"\d+"));

CollectionAssert Class

Note: Prefer Assert class equivalents when available (e.g., Assert.Contains).

// Containment
CollectionAssert.Contains(collection, expectedItem);
CollectionAssert.DoesNotContain(collection, unexpectedItem);

// Equality (same elements, same order)
CollectionAssert.AreEqual(expectedCollection, actualCollection);
CollectionAssert.AreNotEqual(unexpectedCollection, actualCollection);

// Equivalence (same elements, any order)
CollectionAssert.AreEquivalent(expectedCollection, actualCollection);
CollectionAssert.AreNotEquivalent(unexpectedCollection, actualCollection);

// Subset checks
CollectionAssert.IsSubsetOf(subset, superset);
CollectionAssert.IsNotSubsetOf(notSubset, collection);

// Element validation
CollectionAssert.AllItemsAreInstancesOfType(collection, typeof(MyClass));
CollectionAssert.AllItemsAreNotNull(collection);
CollectionAssert.AllItemsAreUnique(collection);

Data-Driven Tests

DataRow

[TestMethod]
[DataRow(1, 2, 3)]
[DataRow(0, 0, 0, DisplayName = "Zeros")]
[DataRow(-1, 1, 0, IgnoreMessage = "Known issue #123")]  // MSTest 3.8+
public void Add_ReturnsSum(int a, int b, int expected)
{
    Assert.AreEqual(expected, Calculator.Add(a, b));
}

DynamicData

The data source can return any of the following types:

  • IEnumerable<(T1, T2, ...)> (ValueTuple) - preferred, provides type safety (MSTest 3.7+)
  • IEnumerable<Tuple<T1, T2, ...>> - provides type safety
  • IEnumerable<TestDataRow> - provides type safety plus control over test metadata (display name, categories)
  • IEnumerable<object[]> - least preferred, no type safety

Note: When creating new test data methods, prefer ValueTuple or TestDataRow over IEnumerable<object[]>. The object[] approach provides no compile-time type checking and can lead to runtime errors from type mismatches.

[TestMethod]
[DynamicData(nameof(TestData))]
public void DynamicTest(int a, int b, int expected)
{
    Assert.AreEqual(expected, Calculator.Add(a, b));
}

// ValueTuple - preferred (MSTest 3.7+)
public static IEnumerable<(int a, int b, int expected)> TestData =>
[
    (1, 2, 3),
    (0, 0, 0),
];

// TestDataRow - when you need custom display names or metadata
public static IEnumerable<TestDataRow<(int a, int b, int expected)>> TestDataWithMetadata =>
[
    new((1, 2, 3)) { DisplayName = "Positive numbers" },
    new((0, 0, 0)) { DisplayName = "Zeros" },
    new((-1, 1, 0)) { DisplayName = "Mixed signs", IgnoreMessage = "Known issue #123" },
];

// IEnumerable<object[]> - avoid for new code (no type safety)
public static IEnumerable<object[]> LegacyTestData =>
[
    [1, 2, 3],
    [0, 0, 0],
];

TestContext

The TestContext class provides test run information, cancellation support, and output methods. See TestContext documentation for complete reference.

Accessing TestContext

// Property (MSTest suppresses CS8618 - don't use nullable or = null!)
public TestContext TestContext { get; set; }

// Constructor injection (MSTest 3.6+) - preferred for immutability
[TestClass]
public sealed class MyTests
{
    private readonly TestContext _testContext;

    public MyTests(TestContext testContext)
    {
        _testContext = testContext;
    }
}

// Static methods receive it as parameter
[ClassInitialize]
public static void ClassInit(TestContext context) { }

// Optional for cleanup methods (MSTest 3.6+)
[ClassCleanup]
public static void ClassCleanup(TestContext context) { }

[AssemblyCleanup]
public static void AssemblyCleanup(TestContext context) { }

Cancellation Token

Always use TestContext.CancellationToken for cooperative cancellation with [Timeout]:

[TestMethod]
[Timeout(5000)]
public async Task LongRunningTest()
{
    await _httpClient.GetAsync(url, TestContext.CancellationToken);
}

Test Run Properties

TestContext.TestName              // Current test method name
TestContext.TestDisplayName       // Display name (3.7+)
TestContext.CurrentTestOutcome    // Pass/Fail/InProgress
TestContext.TestData              // Parameterized test data (3.7+, in TestInitialize/Cleanup)
TestContext.TestException         // Exception if test failed (3.7+, in TestCleanup)
TestContext.DeploymentDirectory   // Directory with deployment items

Output and Result Files

// Write to test output (useful for debugging)
TestContext.WriteLine("Processing item {0}", itemId);

// Attach files to test results (logs, screenshots)
TestContext.AddResultFile(screenshotPath);

// Store/retrieve data across test methods
TestContext.Properties["SharedKey"] = computedValue;

Advanced Features

Retry for Flaky Tests (MSTest 3.9+)

[TestMethod]
[Retry(3)]
public void FlakyTest() { }

Conditional Execution (MSTest 3.10+)

Skip or run tests based on OS or CI environment:

// OS-specific tests
[TestMethod]
[OSCondition(OperatingSystems.Windows)]
public void WindowsOnlyTest() { }

[TestMethod]
[OSCondition(OperatingSystems.Linux | OperatingSystems.MacOS)]
public void UnixOnlyTest() { }

[TestMethod]
[OSCondition(ConditionMode.Exclude, OperatingSystems.Windows)]
public void SkipOnWindowsTest() { }

// CI environment tests
[TestMethod]
[CICondition]  // Runs only in CI (default: ConditionMode.Include)
public void CIOnlyTest() { }

[TestMethod]
[CICondition(ConditionMode.Exclude)]  // Skips in CI, runs locally
public void LocalOnlyTest() { }

Parallelization

// Assembly level
[assembly: Parallelize(Workers = 4, Scope = ExecutionScope.MethodLevel)]

// Disable for specific class
[TestClass]
[DoNotParallelize]
public sealed class SequentialTests { }

Work Item Traceability (MSTest 3.8+)

Link tests to work items for traceability in test reports:

// Azure DevOps work items
[TestMethod]
[WorkItem(12345)]  // Links to work item #12345
public void Feature_Scenario_ExpectedBehavior() { }

// Multiple work items
[TestMethod]
[WorkItem(12345)]
[WorkItem(67890)]
public void Feature_CoversMultipleRequirements() { }

// GitHub issues (MSTest 3.8+)
[TestMethod]
[GitHubWorkItem("https://github.com/owner/repo/issues/42")]
public void BugFix_Issue42_IsResolved() { }

Work item associations appear in test results and can be used for:

  • Tracing test coverage to requirements
  • Linking bug fixes to regression tests
  • Generating traceability reports in CI/CD pipelines

Common Mistakes to Avoid

// ❌ Wrong argument order
Assert.AreEqual(actual, expected);
// ✅ Correct
Assert.AreEqual(expected, actual);

// ❌ Using ExpectedException (obsolete)
[ExpectedException(typeof(ArgumentException))]
// ✅ Use Assert.Throws
Assert.Throws<ArgumentException>(() => Method());

// ❌ Using LINQ Single() - unclear exception
var item = items.Single();
// ✅ Use ContainsSingle - better failure message
var item = Assert.ContainsSingle(items);

// ❌ Hard cast - unclear exception
var handler = (MyHandler)result;
// ✅ Type assertion - shows actual type on failure
var handler = Assert.IsInstanceOfType<MyHandler>(result);

// ❌ Ignoring cancellation token
await client.GetAsync(url, CancellationToken.None);
// ✅ Flow test cancellation
await client.GetAsync(url, TestContext.CancellationToken);

// ❌ Making TestContext nullable - leads to unnecessary null checks
public TestContext? TestContext { get; set; }
// ❌ Using null! - MSTest already suppresses CS8618 for this property
public TestContext TestContext { get; set; } = null!;
// ✅ Declare without nullable or initializer - MSTest handles the warning
public TestContext TestContext { get; set; }

Test Organization

  • Group tests by feature or component
  • Use [TestCategory("Category")] for filtering
  • Use [TestProperty("Name", "Value")] for custom metadata (e.g., [TestProperty("Bug", "12345")])
  • Use [Priority(1)] for critical tests
  • Enable relevant MSTest analyzers (MSTEST0020 for constructor preference)

Mocking and Isolation

  • Use Moq or NSubstitute for mocking dependencies
  • Use interfaces to facilitate mocking
  • Mock dependencies to isolate units under test

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Map an existing codebase into seven documents covering its technology, structure, architecture, conventions, integrations, tests, and concerns. Link findings to file evidence, mark unknowns, and highlight differences between stated plans and the actual implementation.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Get oriented in an unfamiliar codebase
  • Prepare documentation for a project handover
  • Compare documented architecture with implementation
github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月17日 更新

Assess a repository’s readiness for AI agents with AgentRC and generate a standalone HTML dashboard. Review scores across nine areas, see prioritized improvements, and optionally apply scoring policies tailored to an organization.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Assessing a repository’s readiness for AI agents
  • Prioritizing improvements from assessment results
  • Reviewing scores under an organization’s own policy
github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月17日 更新

Generate coding agent instruction files from a project's actual code using AgentRC. Capture detected languages, frameworks, and conventions in one shared file or split rules by topic and project area, with a preview before writing.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Create project instructions for VS Code Copilot
  • Refresh agent rules after project changes
  • Split monorepo instructions by project area
github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月17日 更新

Customize AgentRC readiness assessments to match team or organization standards. Choose or create policies that adjust check importance, disable irrelevant checks, set pass thresholds, and define requirements for automated checks in CI workflows.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Set shared readiness standards across an organization
  • Focus assessments on AI tooling
  • Adjust the importance of individual checks
github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月17日 更新

Analyze supplied ad performance data to identify wasted spend, strong campaigns, and next tests. Compare channels, assess whether test differences are meaningful, and produce budget reallocation recommendations with a prioritized action plan.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Identify ads and keywords to pause
  • Find campaigns and audiences worth scaling
  • Assess whether A/B test results are meaningful
github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月17日 更新

Turn code files into learning resources by adding comments that explain syntax, programming concepts, and design choices. Adjust explanation depth and repetition to the reader’s knowledge while preserving file structure, encoding, and syntax.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Add beginner-friendly explanations to existing code
  • Document the reasoning behind syntax and design choices
  • Adjust comment depth for readers with different experience
github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月17日 更新

查看 github 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题