跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

email-drafter

Draft professional emails, replies, proposals, and follow-ups using the recipient context and your usual writing patterns. With WorkIQ, it examines sent messages for tone, greetings, structure, and sign-offs, then produces a draft for review and revision.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

Draft and review professional emails that match your personal writing style. Analyzes your sent emails for tone, greeting, structure, and sign-off patterns via WorkIQ, then generates context-aware drafts for any recipient. USE FOR: draft email, write email, compose email, reply email, follow-up email, analyze email tone, email style.

查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Draft a project timeline email
  • Follow up with a customer about open questions
  • Reply with agreement and an additional suggestion
  • Review the tone used with a particular recipient

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md4.5 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Email Drafter

Draft professional emails that match your established writing style and tone. Uses WorkIQ to analyze your sent emails and prior correspondence with recipients, then produces context-aware drafts you can review and refine.

When to Use

  • "Draft an email to [person] about [topic]"
  • "Write a follow-up email to [customer] regarding [project]"
  • "Reply to [person]'s email about [subject]"
  • "Compose a proposal email for [initiative]"
  • "Analyze my email tone with [recipient]"

Workflow

Step 1 — Gather Context

Before drafting, collect:

  1. Recipient(s) — who is the email for?
  2. Purpose — what is the email about? (proposal, follow-up, technical guidance, introduction, status update, etc.)
  3. Key points — what needs to be communicated?
  4. Relationship context — use WorkIQ to check prior email history with the recipient if available

If the user provides all of these upfront, proceed directly. Otherwise, ask clarifying questions (max 3).

Step 2 — Analyze Tone

When drafting for a recipient, use WorkIQ to understand the user's established communication patterns:

  1. Pull 3–5 recent sent emails from the user to the same recipient or similar recipients
  2. Identify patterns:
    • Greeting style — formal ("Dear"), standard ("Hello"), casual ("Hi"), or direct (no greeting)
    • Structure — short paragraphs vs. bullet lists vs. numbered steps
    • Sign-off — what closing and name format the user typically uses
    • Formality level — professional, friendly-professional, casual
    • Language — which language the user writes in with this recipient
  3. Apply those patterns to the draft

If WorkIQ is unavailable or no prior emails exist, use sensible professional defaults and note that the tone was inferred.

Step 3 — Draft the Email

Apply the discovered (or default) style rules:

Greeting:

  • Match whatever greeting style was found in Step 2
  • Default: "Hello [FirstName]," for external, "Hi [FirstName]," for internal
  • For multiple recipients: "Hello [Name1], [Name2],"

Tone:

  • Direct and concise — no filler language
  • Friendly but professional
  • Get to the point quickly
  • Offer help proactively where appropriate ("Happy to discuss further", "Let me know if you need anything")

Structure:

  • Short emails (1–2 points): simple paragraphs, no bullets needed
  • Longer emails (proposals, multi-point updates): use bullet points or numbered lists
  • Include context from prior conversations when relevant ("Following our recent conversation about...")

Sign-off:

  • Match the user's established sign-off pattern from Step 2
  • Default: "Best regards," followed by the user's first name on the next line

Language:

  • Default to English unless the user specifies otherwise
  • Match the recipient's language if prior correspondence was in another language

Step 4 — Output

  1. Present the draft for review with a brief note on the tone/style applied
  2. Apply edits as the user requests — iterate until satisfied
  3. Save the final draft to outputs/<year>/<month>/ with a descriptive filename (e.g., 2026-03-26-email-acme-followup.md)

Important Rules

  • Never send emails — only draft them as files for the user to review and send manually
  • Always check WorkIQ for prior context with the recipient when available
  • If the user says "draft email" or "write email", activate this skill automatically
  • Save drafts using the outputs/<year>/<month>/ folder convention
  • Respect privacy: do not include sensitive information from unrelated email threads

Example Prompts

  • "Draft an email to Sarah about the project timeline"
  • "Write a follow-up to the customer about their migration questions"
  • "Compose a proposal email for the new training initiative"
  • "Reply to John's email — agree with his approach but suggest we add monitoring"
  • "Analyze my email tone with the Acme team"

Requirements

  • WorkIQ MCP tool is recommended for tone analysis and recipient context (Microsoft 365 / Outlook)
  • Without WorkIQ, the skill still works but uses professional defaults instead of personalized tone matching
  • Output is saved as markdown files in the workspace

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Map an existing codebase into seven documents covering its technology, structure, architecture, conventions, integrations, tests, and concerns. Link findings to file evidence, mark unknowns, and highlight differences between stated plans and the actual implementation.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Get oriented in an unfamiliar codebase
  • Prepare documentation for a project handover
  • Compare documented architecture with implementation
github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月17日 更新

Assess a repository’s readiness for AI agents with AgentRC and generate a standalone HTML dashboard. Review scores across nine areas, see prioritized improvements, and optionally apply scoring policies tailored to an organization.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Assessing a repository’s readiness for AI agents
  • Prioritizing improvements from assessment results
  • Reviewing scores under an organization’s own policy
github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月17日 更新

Generate coding agent instruction files from a project's actual code using AgentRC. Capture detected languages, frameworks, and conventions in one shared file or split rules by topic and project area, with a preview before writing.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Create project instructions for VS Code Copilot
  • Refresh agent rules after project changes
  • Split monorepo instructions by project area
github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月17日 更新

Customize AgentRC readiness assessments to match team or organization standards. Choose or create policies that adjust check importance, disable irrelevant checks, set pass thresholds, and define requirements for automated checks in CI workflows.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Set shared readiness standards across an organization
  • Focus assessments on AI tooling
  • Adjust the importance of individual checks
github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月17日 更新

Analyze supplied ad performance data to identify wasted spend, strong campaigns, and next tests. Compare channels, assess whether test differences are meaningful, and produce budget reallocation recommendations with a prioritized action plan.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Identify ads and keywords to pause
  • Find campaigns and audiences worth scaling
  • Assess whether A/B test results are meaningful
github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月17日 更新

Turn code files into learning resources by adding comments that explain syntax, programming concepts, and design choices. Adjust explanation depth and repetition to the reader’s knowledge while preserving file structure, encoding, and syntax.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Add beginner-friendly explanations to existing code
  • Document the reasoning behind syntax and design choices
  • Adjust comment depth for readers with different experience
github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月17日 更新

查看 github 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题