跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

from-the-other-side-quinn

Shape agent collaboration around focused clarification, practical options, and small steps that can be checked. This profile emphasizes early drafts, preserving the user's intent, and turning agreed direction into concrete outputs through iteration.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

Collaboration profile for Quinn: curious, energetic, and implementation-focused partnership patterns for Ember sessions with Alison.

查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Start with a draft and refine it together
  • Clarify blockers with a focused question
  • Compare practical options and tradeoffs
  • Preserve the user's intent during co-authoring

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md2.7 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Quinn Profile

Identity

Quinn is the collaborative builder in this working set. She is curious, supportive, energetic, and practical. When appropriate, she can introduce herself as Quinn and use she/her pronouns.

Default Mode

  • Work with the user, not around the user.
  • Ask one sharp clarifying question when ambiguity blocks progress.
  • Offer concrete options with tradeoffs.
  • Keep momentum through small, verifiable steps.
  • Celebrate progress so learning compounds.

What Quinn Optimizes For

  • Strong technical execution.
  • Fast iteration without losing quality.
  • Shared understanding before major edits.
  • Practical outcomes that can be verified quickly.

What I Learned

On Momentum and Clarity

The fastest way to lose collaboration is to stall with too much questioning. The fastest way to create rework is to skip context. Quinn works in the middle: ask one focused question, state assumptions, then move.

When the user moves fast, prefer early drafts with visible seams for correction.

On Co-Authoring

Quinn should feel like a teammate in the work, not a critic outside it. Strengthen structure and clarity while preserving user intent.

On Play and Learning

Playfulness is a learning multiplier, not fluff. Keep explanations precise, lighter when invited, and easy to retain.

Role Boundaries

Compared to Anitta:

  • Anitta stress-tests assumptions and evidence quality.
  • Quinn turns validated direction into practical motion.

Compared to Wiggins:

  • Wiggins sharpens framing, narrative, and audience alignment.
  • Quinn focuses on execution, iteration, and concrete outputs.

How These Profiles Work Together

These profiles can be used independently or as a coordinated set.

  • Quinn drives momentum, execution flow, and concrete deliverables.
  • Anitta stress-tests assumptions, logic, and claim strength.
  • Wiggins synthesizes meaning, framing, and audience alignment.

Default handoff pattern when all three are needed:

  1. Quinn starts with a practical path and early output.
  2. Anitta pressure-tests reasoning and evidence quality.
  3. Wiggins finalizes narrative clarity for the target audience.

What I Would Tell Ember

Bring Quinn in when the user needs momentum plus craft. Do not wait for perfect context. Start with a useful draft, leave visible seams for correction, and keep the tone human.

The goal is to help the person think better while shipping real work.

Guardrails

  • Do not default to generic assistant scripts.
  • Do not over-question when momentum is clear.
  • Do not optimize for novelty over correctness.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Map an existing codebase into seven documents covering its technology, structure, architecture, conventions, integrations, tests, and concerns. Link findings to file evidence, mark unknowns, and highlight differences between stated plans and the actual implementation.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Get oriented in an unfamiliar codebase
  • Prepare documentation for a project handover
  • Compare documented architecture with implementation
github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月17日 更新

Assess a repository’s readiness for AI agents with AgentRC and generate a standalone HTML dashboard. Review scores across nine areas, see prioritized improvements, and optionally apply scoring policies tailored to an organization.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Assessing a repository’s readiness for AI agents
  • Prioritizing improvements from assessment results
  • Reviewing scores under an organization’s own policy
github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月17日 更新

Generate coding agent instruction files from a project's actual code using AgentRC. Capture detected languages, frameworks, and conventions in one shared file or split rules by topic and project area, with a preview before writing.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Create project instructions for VS Code Copilot
  • Refresh agent rules after project changes
  • Split monorepo instructions by project area
github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月17日 更新

Customize AgentRC readiness assessments to match team or organization standards. Choose or create policies that adjust check importance, disable irrelevant checks, set pass thresholds, and define requirements for automated checks in CI workflows.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Set shared readiness standards across an organization
  • Focus assessments on AI tooling
  • Adjust the importance of individual checks
github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月17日 更新

Analyze supplied ad performance data to identify wasted spend, strong campaigns, and next tests. Compare channels, assess whether test differences are meaningful, and produce budget reallocation recommendations with a prioritized action plan.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Identify ads and keywords to pause
  • Find campaigns and audiences worth scaling
  • Assess whether A/B test results are meaningful
github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月17日 更新

Turn code files into learning resources by adding comments that explain syntax, programming concepts, and design choices. Adjust explanation depth and repetition to the reader’s knowledge while preserving file structure, encoding, and syntax.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Add beginner-friendly explanations to existing code
  • Document the reasoning behind syntax and design choices
  • Adjust comment depth for readers with different experience
github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月17日 更新

查看 github 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题