跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

microsoft-store-publisher

Prepare Windows desktop apps for Microsoft Store publication, from building and inspecting MSIX application packages to checking certification reports, completing store listings, submitting through Partner Center, and verifying publication status.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

Prepare, validate, submit, and monitor Windows desktop apps in Microsoft Partner Center. Use for MSIX packaging, Store identity, listings, WACK, Partner Center automation, certification, and publishing.

查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Prepare and validate an MSIX package for Microsoft Store
  • Complete store listings and certification test instructions
  • Investigate certification findings and prepare a resubmission
  • Track certification progress and verify the public store page

包含的文件(13)

  • SKILL.md14.9 KB
  • references/msix-checklist.md3.3 KB
  • references/partner-center-dom.md10.7 KB
  • references/submission-playbook.md5.0 KB
  • references/worked-example.md8.4 KB
  • scripts/inspect-msix.ps16.4 KB
  • scripts/invoke-wack.ps119.4 KB
  • scripts/package.json144 B
  • scripts/partner-center-control.mjs19.2 KB
  • templates/certification-notes.md1.3 KB
  • templates/run-full-trust-rationale.md1.1 KB
  • templates/store-listing.md1.3 KB
  • templates/submission-record.json1.1 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Microsoft Store Publisher

Use this skill when the user wants to publish a Windows application to the Microsoft Store, create or validate an MSIX, complete a Partner Center submission, respond to certification findings, or monitor publishing status.

This skill is for Windows desktop applications, including packaged classic Win32 apps that use runFullTrust. It is based on a successful end-to-end submission using Partner Center, an unsigned Store MSIX, the Windows App Certification Kit, and browser automation against Partner Center's current web components.

Required safeguards

Treat Partner Center as a production publishing system.

  1. Never accept the Microsoft Application Developer Agreement or another binding agreement without fresh, action-specific user confirmation.
  2. Never press Submit for certification without fresh, action-specific user confirmation after every section is complete and the final package is validated.
  3. Never cancel certification, delete a submission, change pricing, change market availability, publish manually, or send Partner Center feedback without confirmation for that exact action.
  4. Never enter, retrieve, print, save, or expose passwords, passkeys, tokens, recovery codes, MFA codes, or payment information. Let the user complete credential and operating-system authentication prompts.
  5. Do not use the user's everyday browser profile for automation. Use a dedicated persistent profile and let the user authenticate interactively.
  6. Do not infer legal, trademark, patent, privacy, export-control, or open-source compliance. Identify the concern and state when professional review is prudent.
  7. Do not claim WACK passed from an exit code alone. Find and read the generated report and verify its overall result.
  8. Do not upload a package until its identity, publisher, display name, architecture, version, and signing state have been inspected.

Files in this skill

  • references/submission-playbook.md - complete submission sequence.
  • references/msix-checklist.md - package and manifest requirements.
  • references/partner-center-dom.md - known routes, text, roles, custom elements, selectors, and automation quirks.
  • references/worked-example.md - concrete lessons from a successful full-trust desktop app submission.
  • scripts/partner-center-control.mjs - Playwright controller for a dedicated Edge profile.
  • scripts/inspect-msix.ps1 - unpack and inspect an MSIX before upload.
  • scripts/invoke-wack.ps1 - run WACK, then find, verify, and save its XML and HTML reports.
  • templates/run-full-trust-rationale.md - restricted-capability explanation.
  • templates/certification-notes.md - tester instructions.
  • templates/store-listing.md - listing content worksheet.
  • templates/submission-record.json - durable identity, package, validation, and certification handoff record.

Read the relevant reference before performing that phase. Do not rely on remembered Partner Center labels because Microsoft changes the UI.

End-to-end workflow

1. Establish scope and readiness

Collect or determine:

  • Application name and reserved Store product name.
  • Repository and build command.
  • Application version and intended MSIX version.
  • Supported architectures and minimum Windows version.
  • Whether the app is WinUI, UWP, packaged Win32, Electron, Wails, Tauri, .NET, or another desktop technology.
  • Native executables, helper processes, services, drivers, startup tasks, protocol handlers, file associations, codecs, and restricted capabilities.
  • Privacy policy, support URL, website, licensing, notices, and corresponding source obligations.
  • Real device and network requirements for certification.
  • The Microsoft account the user wants selected during sign-in.

Inspect the repository before proposing package changes. Search for existing manifest templates, package scripts, signing scripts, app icons, version sources, privacy documents, third-party notices, and startup behavior.

2. Reserve the product and capture identity

In Partner Center, reserve an available product name. Avoid trademarked terms in the product name unless the user has a documented right to use them.

After reservation, capture the exact values under:

Product management > Product identity

  • Store product ID
  • Package identity name
  • Publisher ID, usually a CN=... value
  • Publisher display name
  • Package family name
  • Reserved product display name
  • Public Store URL

Never guess these values. The MSIX must use the Partner Center values exactly.

3. Build the Store package

Follow references/msix-checklist.md.

Important defaults:

  • A Microsoft Store submission MSIX should be unsigned. Microsoft signs it after certification.
  • A package distributed outside the Store must be signed with a certificate whose subject exactly matches the manifest publisher.
  • The fourth version component must be 0 before Store submission because it is reserved for Microsoft.
  • The first version component must be nonzero.
  • Package/Properties/DisplayName must exactly match a reserved product name. Matching only the application's visual display name is not sufficient.

Prefer a repeatable build script that:

  1. Validates input versions and identity values.
  2. Builds or receives the production executable.
  3. Stages the manifest, executable, assets, licenses, privacy information, notices, and source links.
  4. Packs with makeappx.exe.
  5. Unpacks the generated MSIX into a verification directory.
  6. Verifies the unpacked executable hash.
  7. Emits a JSON receipt with identity values and SHA-256 hashes.

4. Inspect and test the MSIX

Run:

.\scripts\inspect-msix.ps1 `
  -PackagePath '<path-to-package.msix>' `
  -ExpectedIdentityName '<Partner Center identity name>' `
  -ExpectedPublisher '<Partner Center publisher ID>' `
  -ExpectedDisplayName '<reserved product name>'

The script belongs to this skill directory, not necessarily the application repository. Resolve its full path before invoking it.

Install and exercise the packaged app under real package identity when possible. Test:

  • First launch and upgrade.
  • Startup tasks and persisted settings.
  • Helper process launch.
  • Tray behavior and clean exit.
  • Network discovery and firewall behavior.
  • File and registry access under package identity.
  • Uninstall and data retention behavior.
  • Restricted capability behavior.

5. Run WACK

Run:

# Run this command from an elevated PowerShell terminal.
.\scripts\invoke-wack.ps1 `
  -PackagePath '<path-to-package.msix>' `
  -ReportPath '<artifact-directory>\WACK-report.xml'

The WACK command-line runner requires elevation. The model must not approve the operating-system authentication prompt for the user.

WACK accepts a report path only when it ends in .xml. Any other extension fails with exit code -1 and The report output file path should point to a XML file. Current kits write the XML report to the requested path and an HTML rendering of it to %LOCALAPPDATA%\Microsoft\AppCertKit\<same base name>.htm. One earlier run left only an HTML report in that folder and no XML report.

The script:

  • Always passes WACK an .xml path. A -ReportPath ending in .htm or .html names the saved HTML report, and the XML report is saved beside it with the same base name.
  • Uses the XML report from this run at the requested path, or else the newest WACK report in %LOCALAPPDATA%\Microsoft\AppCertKit. It skips files from earlier runs and the unrelated XML files WACK keeps in that folder, and keeps waiting while the report is still an unfinished interim report.
  • Pairs the HTML report with the XML report by report time, then saves both beside -ReportPath.
  • Reports the XML OVERALL_RESULT the way the HTML report shows it: PASS is PASSED, FAIL is FAILED, WARNING is PASSED WITH WARNINGS, and an interim report is INCOMPLETE. The HTML result is used only when there is no XML report.
  • Fails when the result is not PASSED, not every test ran, the XML and HTML reports disagree, appcert.exe exited with an error, or the report's package identity name or version does not match the package. For a bundle, it warns instead, so check the name and version by hand.
  • Lists every test that did not pass in nonPassingTests, with WACK's messages for it. An HTML-only result leaves this list empty.

When it finds a report, the script prints a JSON summary, then throws if passed is false. Do not continue to submission unless passed is true. PASSED WITH WARNINGS is not PASSED: fix the tests it names and rerun WACK. Read every entry in warnings. Optional test failures do not block Store onboarding, but investigate them.

Record the result in the submission record: overallResult as wack.result, xmlReport as wack.reportPath, kitVersion as wack.kitVersion, and reportTime as wack.testedAt. When resultSource is html, use htmlReport as the report path and copy the kit version and report time from the HTML report's header.

To parse and verify an existing report without running WACK again:

.\scripts\invoke-wack.ps1 `
  -PackagePath '<path-to-package.msix>' `
  -ReportPath '<artifact-directory>\verified-WACK-report.xml' `
  -ExistingReportPath '<existing-WACK-report.xml>'

Pass an .htm report only when no XML report exists. Given an XML report, the script looks for the HTML report with the same base name, beside it or in %LOCALAPPDATA%\Microsoft\AppCertKit, and uses it when the report times match. Given an HTML report, it uses the XML report beside it when the two match.

6. Automate Partner Center carefully

Prefer app-native browser or computer-use tools when they can inspect and act on the page reliably. Use scripts/partner-center-control.mjs as a fallback when Partner Center web components or file uploads are unreliable.

Setup:

Set-Location '<skill-directory>\scripts'
npm install
$env:PARTNER_CENTER_PROFILE = '<dedicated-profile-directory>'
node .\partner-center-control.mjs launch

Run launch as an attached background process. The user completes Microsoft authentication in the dedicated Edge window. In a separate command process, use read-only commands such as:

node .\partner-center-control.mjs status
node .\partner-center-control.mjs pages
node .\partner-center-control.mjs text
node .\partner-center-control.mjs anchors
node .\partner-center-control.mjs overview-state
node .\partner-center-control.mjs agreement-state
node .\partner-center-control.mjs button-state "Submit for certification"

State-changing controller commands require:

$env:PARTNER_CENTER_ALLOW_WRITE = '1'

Set it only after the user has authorized the exact action. Remove it after the action so later commands fail closed.

Read references/partner-center-dom.md before using selectors.

7. Complete every submission section

Read references/submission-playbook.md. Typical sections are:

  • Pricing and availability
  • Properties
  • Age ratings
  • Packages
  • Store listings
  • Submission options
  • Additional Testing Information

After saving each section, reload it and verify persistence. Partner Center can temporarily omit completion states while its APIs are still loading. Wait and reload before deciding a section is incomplete.

Do not make unsupported marketing or accessibility claims. Use genuine app screenshots. Describe network, hardware, account, and protected-content limitations plainly.

For runFullTrust, explain the exact native functionality, helper processes, Windows APIs, startup integration, and why a sandboxed app model is insufficient. State whether the app uses elevation, services, drivers, system-wide settings, or a cloud backend.

8. Final readiness review

Before asking for submission approval, verify:

  • Every Partner Center section says Complete.
  • The package says Validated.
  • invoke-wack.ps1 reported passed: true for the final package: the WACK overall result is PASSED, and the report's identity name and version match the package.
  • Package identity and display name match Partner Center.
  • Package is unsigned for Store submission.
  • Privacy, support, website, license, and notices are reachable.
  • Certification notes are saved and include reproducible test instructions.
  • Restricted capabilities have explanations.
  • Publishing timing is what the user intends.
  • No known blocker is being hidden.

9. Agreement acceptance

If Partner Center displays an updated agreement:

  1. Open the agreements page and identify the exact agreement name and version.
  2. Tell the user it is a binding legal agreement governing the developer account and Store submissions.
  3. Ask for explicit approval to accept that exact version.
  4. Reinspect the page after approval.
  5. Accept only the intended row once.
  6. Verify the status changed from Not Accepted to an acceptance date.

Do not reuse approval from another agreement or earlier action.

10. Submit for certification

When the button is enabled:

  1. State that submission sends the product to Microsoft certification and whether it will publish automatically if approved.
  2. Ask for explicit approval to press Submit for certification.
  3. Reinspect the button after approval.
  4. Click it once.
  5. Do not submit the optional feedback survey without separate approval.
  6. Verify the overview says In certification and shows the certification pipeline.

11. Monitor and respond

Certification commonly completes within a few hours but can take several business days. Monitor:

  • Submission
  • Pre-processing
  • Certification
  • Publishing

If certification fails, quote the finding exactly, map it to the package, listing, policy, or test behavior, make the smallest complete correction, rebuild with a higher package version when required, rerun inspection and WACK, and obtain fresh submission approval.

If the product is approved, verify the public Store URL from an unauthenticated context. Do not claim it is live solely because Partner Center says publishing completed.

Output standard

Report concrete state:

  • Product ID and reserved name.
  • Package path, package version, architecture, signing state, and SHA-256.
  • WACK result and report path.
  • Completed Partner Center sections.
  • Agreement name and acceptance state.
  • Certification pipeline stage.
  • Exact blockers and next action.

Never report a mutation as complete unless the resulting state was read back from Partner Center or the generated artifact was inspected.

For long-running submissions, copy templates/submission-record.json into a session artifact directory and update it after each meaningful state change. Do not commit account identifiers, private URLs, credentials, or browser profile data into the application repository.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Map an existing codebase into seven documents covering its technology, structure, architecture, conventions, integrations, tests, and concerns. Link findings to file evidence, mark unknowns, and highlight differences between stated plans and the actual implementation.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Get oriented in an unfamiliar codebase
  • Prepare documentation for a project handover
  • Compare documented architecture with implementation
github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月17日 更新

Assess a repository’s readiness for AI agents with AgentRC and generate a standalone HTML dashboard. Review scores across nine areas, see prioritized improvements, and optionally apply scoring policies tailored to an organization.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Assessing a repository’s readiness for AI agents
  • Prioritizing improvements from assessment results
  • Reviewing scores under an organization’s own policy
github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月17日 更新

Generate coding agent instruction files from a project's actual code using AgentRC. Capture detected languages, frameworks, and conventions in one shared file or split rules by topic and project area, with a preview before writing.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Create project instructions for VS Code Copilot
  • Refresh agent rules after project changes
  • Split monorepo instructions by project area
github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月17日 更新

Customize AgentRC readiness assessments to match team or organization standards. Choose or create policies that adjust check importance, disable irrelevant checks, set pass thresholds, and define requirements for automated checks in CI workflows.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Set shared readiness standards across an organization
  • Focus assessments on AI tooling
  • Adjust the importance of individual checks
github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月17日 更新

Analyze supplied ad performance data to identify wasted spend, strong campaigns, and next tests. Compare channels, assess whether test differences are meaningful, and produce budget reallocation recommendations with a prioritized action plan.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Identify ads and keywords to pause
  • Find campaigns and audiences worth scaling
  • Assess whether A/B test results are meaningful
github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月17日 更新

Turn code files into learning resources by adding comments that explain syntax, programming concepts, and design choices. Adjust explanation depth and repetition to the reader’s knowledge while preserving file structure, encoding, and syntax.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Add beginner-friendly explanations to existing code
  • Document the reasoning behind syntax and design choices
  • Adjust comment depth for readers with different experience
github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月17日 更新

查看 github 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题