跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

mvvm-toolkit-di

Connect CommunityToolkit.Mvvm ViewModels to Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection, which supplies their required services. Get guidance on startup setup, instance lifetimes, messaging, view integration, and replacing dependencies in tests across supported .NET user interface frameworks.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

Wire CommunityToolkit.Mvvm ViewModels into Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection. Covers the .NET Generic Host composition root, constructor injection, service lifetimes (Singleton / Transient / Scoped), IMessenger registration, resolving ViewModels in Views, keyed services, testing seams, and the legacy Ioc.Default escape hatch. Use across WPF, WinUI 3, .NET MAUI, Uno, and Avalonia.

查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Set up dependency injection in a new XAML app
  • Choose shared or per-page service instances
  • Diagnose missing service registration errors
  • Replace ViewModel dependencies with test doubles

包含的文件(2)

  • SKILL.md9.1 KB
  • references/dependency-injection.md8.0 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

CommunityToolkit.Mvvm + Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection

The MVVM Toolkit deliberately ships no DI container — it composes with Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection, the same container ASP.NET Core, Worker services, and the .NET Generic Host use.

TL;DR. Build the service provider once at startup (prefer Host.CreateDefaultBuilder()). Register services and ViewModels. Inject through constructors. Avoid Ioc.Default.GetService<T>() in user code.


When to use this skill

  • Standing up the composition root for a new XAML app (WPF, WinUI 3, MAUI, Uno, Avalonia)
  • Choosing service/VM lifetimes
  • Wiring IMessenger once and injecting it into ObservableRecipient ViewModels
  • Resolving a page's ViewModel without coupling to a service locator
  • Diagnosing "Unable to resolve service for type X while attempting to activate Y"

For source generators and ViewModel patterns see the mvvm-toolkit skill. For Messenger pub/sub see mvvm-toolkit-messenger.


Recommended composition root (Generic Host)

using Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection;
using Microsoft.Extensions.Hosting;
using CommunityToolkit.Mvvm.Messaging;

public partial class App : Application
{
    public IHost Host { get; }

    public App()
    {
        Host = Microsoft.Extensions.Hosting.Host
            .CreateDefaultBuilder()
            .ConfigureServices((_, services) =>
            {
                services.AddSingleton<IFilesService, FilesService>();
                services.AddSingleton<ISettingsService, SettingsService>();
                services.AddSingleton<IMessenger>(WeakReferenceMessenger.Default);

                services.AddSingleton<ShellViewModel>();
                services.AddTransient<ContactViewModel>();
                services.AddTransient<EditorViewModel>();
            })
            .Build();
    }

    public static T GetService<T>() where T : class =>
        ((App)Current).Host.Services.GetRequiredService<T>();
}

Generic Host benefits:

  • appsettings.json binding via Microsoft.Extensions.Configuration
  • Logging via Microsoft.Extensions.Logging
  • Hosted services (IHostedService) for background work
  • Scope validation in development builds

WPF and Windows Forms must integrate the host lifetime with the app lifetime — see Use the .NET Generic Host in a WPF app.

Without Generic Host

When you only need a service container and want zero extra dependencies:

var services = new ServiceCollection();
services.AddSingleton<IFilesService, FilesService>();
services.AddTransient<ContactViewModel>();
ServiceProvider provider = services.BuildServiceProvider();

Constructor injection

Inject services and child ViewModels through the constructor:

public sealed partial class ContactViewModel(
    IFilesService files,
    IMessenger messenger,
    ILogger<ContactViewModel> logger)
    : ObservableRecipient(messenger)
{
    [ObservableProperty]
    private string? name;

    [RelayCommand]
    private async Task SaveAsync()
    {
        logger.LogInformation("Saving {Name}", Name);
        await files.SaveAsync(Name!);
    }
}

Why constructor injection beats a service locator:

  • Dependencies are explicit and visible at the call site
  • Unit tests inject fakes/mocks directly
  • The DI container validates the dependency graph at startup
  • Missing registrations throw immediately, not at first use

Lifetimes

LifetimeMethodTypical use in XAML apps
SingletonAddSingleton<T>Shell/main-window VM, settings, file/HTTP services, the shared IMessenger, app-wide caches
TransientAddTransient<T>Per-page or per-document ViewModels (a fresh instance every resolve)
ScopedAddScoped<T>Rarely needed in client apps; useful with explicit IServiceScope (e.g., per-window scopes)
services.AddSingleton<ShellViewModel>();   // 1 instance for app lifetime
services.AddTransient<NoteViewModel>();    // new instance per resolve
services.AddScoped<DialogService>();       // 1 per scope (rare)

Resolving in a View

Resolve the page's root ViewModel in code-behind, then let it pull its own dependencies:

public sealed partial class ContactPage : Page
{
    public ContactViewModel ViewModel { get; }

    public ContactPage()
    {
        ViewModel = App.GetService<ContactViewModel>();
        InitializeComponent();
    }
}

Bind in XAML with {x:Bind ViewModel.Xxx} (compiled bindings) or {Binding Xxx} against DataContext.

For navigation frameworks (WinUI 3 Frame.Navigate, MAUI Shell, Prism, MVVMCross), let the framework resolve the page and the page resolves its ViewModel from DI. Don't new ViewModels manually.


IMessenger registration

Register the messenger you want once, inject IMessenger everywhere:

services.AddSingleton<IMessenger>(WeakReferenceMessenger.Default);
// or
services.AddSingleton<IMessenger>(StrongReferenceMessenger.Default);

Then:

public sealed partial class MyViewModel(IMessenger messenger)
    : ObservableRecipient(messenger) { }

For per-window messengers, register with keyed services or as scoped instances and inject into per-window ViewModels.

See the mvvm-toolkit-messenger skill for the messenger surface area.


Keyed services (.NET 8+)

Resolve different implementations of the same interface by key:

services.AddKeyedSingleton<IExporter, CsvExporter>("csv");
services.AddKeyedSingleton<IExporter, JsonExporter>("json");

public sealed partial class ExportViewModel(
    [FromKeyedServices("csv")] IExporter csvExporter,
    [FromKeyedServices("json")] IExporter jsonExporter)
    : ObservableObject { /* ... */ }

Testing seams

Constructor-injected dependencies are trivial to swap in tests. With Moq:

[Fact]
public async Task Save_calls_files_service()
{
    var files = new Mock<IFilesService>();
    var messenger = new WeakReferenceMessenger();
    var logger = NullLogger<ContactViewModel>.Instance;

    var vm = new ContactViewModel(files.Object, messenger, logger)
    {
        Name = "Ada"
    };

    await vm.SaveCommand.ExecuteAsync(null);

    files.Verify(f => f.SaveAsync("Ada"), Times.Once);
}

If you're mocking Ioc.Default or static state, the ViewModel is using a service locator — refactor to constructor injection.


Legacy: Ioc.Default

CommunityToolkit.Mvvm.DependencyInjection.Ioc is an escape hatch for cases where constructor injection is impossible — XAML-instantiated VMs for design-time data, ValueConverters, control templates.

Ioc.Default.ConfigureServices(
    new ServiceCollection()
        .AddSingleton<IFilesService, FilesService>()
        .AddTransient<ContactViewModel>()
        .BuildServiceProvider());

var files = Ioc.Default.GetRequiredService<IFilesService>();

Treat it as the last resort. Inside ViewModels, services, and any class the DI container can construct, prefer constructor injection.


Common pitfalls

  1. Ioc.Default.GetService<T>() inside a VM constructor. Hides the dependency, breaks unit tests, prevents startup graph validation.
  2. Everything Singleton. A "per-document" VM registered as singleton becomes shared state across all documents — subtle data corruption. Use AddTransient for per-instance VMs.
  3. Multiple BuildServiceProvider() calls. Each call is a fresh container — singletons aren't shared. Build once at startup.
  4. Capturing IServiceProvider in long-lived objects. Indicates a service-locator pattern. Inject the specific dependencies you need.
  5. No scope validation in development. Use Host.CreateDefaultBuilder() (which sets ValidateScopes and ValidateOnBuild in development) so registration mistakes fail at startup, not at first use.
  6. Resolving scoped services from the root provider. They're effectively promoted to singleton lifetime — the warning is silent without scope validation. Either change the lifetime or resolve from an explicit IServiceScope.

References

TopicFile
Full deep dive (Generic Host setup, lifetimes, keyed services, testing patterns, legacy Ioc)references/dependency-injection.md

External:

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Map an existing codebase into seven documents covering its technology, structure, architecture, conventions, integrations, tests, and concerns. Link findings to file evidence, mark unknowns, and highlight differences between stated plans and the actual implementation.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Get oriented in an unfamiliar codebase
  • Prepare documentation for a project handover
  • Compare documented architecture with implementation
github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月17日 更新

Assess a repository’s readiness for AI agents with AgentRC and generate a standalone HTML dashboard. Review scores across nine areas, see prioritized improvements, and optionally apply scoring policies tailored to an organization.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Assessing a repository’s readiness for AI agents
  • Prioritizing improvements from assessment results
  • Reviewing scores under an organization’s own policy
github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月17日 更新

Generate coding agent instruction files from a project's actual code using AgentRC. Capture detected languages, frameworks, and conventions in one shared file or split rules by topic and project area, with a preview before writing.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Create project instructions for VS Code Copilot
  • Refresh agent rules after project changes
  • Split monorepo instructions by project area
github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月17日 更新

Customize AgentRC readiness assessments to match team or organization standards. Choose or create policies that adjust check importance, disable irrelevant checks, set pass thresholds, and define requirements for automated checks in CI workflows.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Set shared readiness standards across an organization
  • Focus assessments on AI tooling
  • Adjust the importance of individual checks
github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月17日 更新

Analyze supplied ad performance data to identify wasted spend, strong campaigns, and next tests. Compare channels, assess whether test differences are meaningful, and produce budget reallocation recommendations with a prioritized action plan.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Identify ads and keywords to pause
  • Find campaigns and audiences worth scaling
  • Assess whether A/B test results are meaningful
github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月17日 更新

Turn code files into learning resources by adding comments that explain syntax, programming concepts, and design choices. Adjust explanation depth and repetition to the reader’s knowledge while preserving file structure, encoding, and syntax.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Add beginner-friendly explanations to existing code
  • Document the reasoning behind syntax and design choices
  • Adjust comment depth for readers with different experience
github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月17日 更新

查看 github 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题