跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

pester-migration

Migrate existing PowerShell Pester tests through major versions from v3 to v6. The skill guides assertion updates, setup restructuring, mock changes, and execution configuration, using before-and-after test results to investigate failures while preserving what each test checks.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

Pester migration skill for upgrading PowerShell Pester test suites across major versions — v3→v4, v4→v5, and v5→v6. Covers the Discovery/Run two-phase model, moving setup into BeforeAll, $PSScriptRoot vs $MyInvocation, mock changes (Assert-MockCalled → Should -Invoke, removed fall-through), Invoke-Pester parameters → PesterConfiguration, data-driven -ForEach/-TestCases, and the v6 breaking changes. Use when the user asks to upgrade, migrate, or modernize Pester tests, fix *.Tests.ps1 files that broke after bumping the Pester version, or convert legacy Should / Invoke-Pester syntax.

查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Migrating Pester tests one major version at a time
  • Fixing tests broken by a Pester upgrade
  • Updating legacy Should and Invoke-Pester syntax
  • Reworking setup and mocks for newer Pester versions

包含的文件(4)

  • SKILL.md8.1 KB
  • references/v3-to-v4.md3.7 KB
  • references/v4-to-v5.md11.1 KB
  • references/v5-to-v6.md10.3 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Pester Migration

Pester is the test framework for PowerShell. Test files end in *.Tests.ps1 and use Describe / Context / It blocks with Should assertions. This skill upgrades an existing suite from one major Pester version to the next and gets it green again.

Mental model: each major jump has a different character. v3→v4 is mostly a syntax rename. v4→v5 is a fundamental runtime change (the Discovery/Run split) and is the hard one. v5→v6 is largely backwards-compatible — a handful of previously-deprecated things now throw. Migrate one major at a time; never skip a version.

Detailed, symptom-driven guides live in references/ — load the one(s) for the jump you are doing.

References

ReferenceWhen to load
v3-to-v4.mdShould Be → Should -Be, Contain → FileContentMatch, Assert-VerifiableMocks → Assert-VerifiableMock, array-assertion edge cases.
v4-to-v5.mdThe big one. Discovery/Run phases, BeforeAll setup, $PSScriptRoot, BeforeDiscovery, -ForEach, mock scoping, Should -Throw wildcards, Invoke-Pester → New-PesterConfiguration.
v5-to-v6.mdPowerShell 5.1/7.4+ only, per-file discovery+run, empty -ForEach throws, duplicate setup blocks throw, name <...> templates evaluate, Assert-MockCalled removed, mocks no longer fall through, code-coverage tracer, legacy Invoke-Pester params removed.

Canonical source: the official migration guides at https://pester.dev/docs/migrations/ — this skill mirrors them. When in doubt, prefer the website.

Step 0 — Detect where you are and where you're going

Find the installed version(s) and the version the tests were written for. These can differ.

# Installed Pester version(s) on this machine
Get-Module Pester -ListAvailable | Select-Object Name, Version, Path

# Version currently imported in the session
(Get-Module Pester).Version

Tell the source version from the test code with these heuristics:

You see in *.Tests.ps1 / build scriptsSuite was written for
Should Be / Should Contain (no dash)v3 or earlier → start at v3-to-v4
$MyInvocation.MyCommand.Path + dot-source at the top of the file; arbitrary code directly under Describev4 → v4-to-v5
Assert-MockCalled, Assert-VerifiableMock, Set-ItResult -Pendingv4 / early-v5 (these are removed in v6)
Invoke-Pester -Script … -OutputFile … -CodeCoverage … (legacy params)v4 invocation → map to config
BeforeAll { . $PSScriptRoot/… }, New-PesterConfiguration, Should -Invokealready v5-style → v5-to-v6

Install the target version when ready:

# Latest stable v5 — pin the major to avoid installing Pester 6
Install-Module Pester -MaximumVersion 5.99.99 -Force

# Pester 6
Install-Module Pester -Force

On Windows PowerShell 5.1 the OS ships a Microsoft-signed built-in Pester 3 that PowerShellGet won't overwrite with the differently-signed newer Pester — add -SkipPublisherCheck there to install side-by-side. Not needed on PowerShell 7+. See https://pester.dev/docs/introduction/installation.

Migration workflow

Run this loop for each major jump. Do not jump two majors at once — go v4→v5, then v5→v6.

  1. Baseline. Run the suite on the current version first and record pass/fail. You need a known-good (or known) starting point so you can tell migration regressions apart from pre-existing failures.
    # Bare Invoke-Pester works on every major; exact parameters differ
    # (v3/v4: -Script/-OutputFile; v5+/v6: -Path/-Output).
    Invoke-Pester
    
  2. Read the reference for this jump (table above) so you know the full scope before editing.
  3. Edit file by file. Apply the mechanical changes (see per-jump cheat sheets below and in the reference). Keep changes small and reviewable — one file or one concern at a time.
  4. Switch versions with Install-Module (Step 0), then re-import: Remove-Module Pester; Import-Module Pester (or start a fresh session).
  5. Run and fix. Re-run with -Output Detailed; use -Output Diagnostic (v4→v5) or read the explicit v6 error messages to locate problems. Match each failure to the symptom → fix tables in the reference.
  6. Green, diff, commit. Re-run until the result matches the baseline (or better). Review the diff, then commit. Migrating in small commits makes regressions trivial to bisect.

What actually changes (scope per jump)

JumpDifficultyNature
v3 → v4LowAssertion-syntax rename (Should -Be). Largely script-automatable.
v4 → v5HighNew two-phase runtime. Test structure changes: setup must move into BeforeAll, discovery-time code into BeforeDiscovery, file location via $PSScriptRoot. Not a pure find-replace.
v5 → v6Low–MediumBackwards-compatible runtime; deprecated features now throw. Mostly small, targeted fixes. Your Should -Be assertions keep working unchanged.

Quick cheat sheets

v4 → v5 (most common fixes)

# 1. Move file import into BeforeAll, use $PSScriptRoot (NOT $MyInvocation.MyCommand.Path)
# BEFORE
$here = Split-Path -Parent $MyInvocation.MyCommand.Path
. "$here\Get-Thing.ps1"
# AFTER
BeforeAll { . $PSScriptRoot/Get-Thing.ps1 }

# 2. Any code that DISCOVERS/generates tests must be in BeforeDiscovery
BeforeDiscovery { $cases = Get-Content $PSScriptRoot/cases.json | ConvertFrom-Json }

# 3. Should -Throw matches with -like wildcards, not .Contains
{ throw 'a long message' } | Should -Throw '*long*'

# 4. Invoke-Pester legacy params → New-PesterConfiguration (see reference for full map)

Full details, scoping rules, and the parameter→config table: references/v4-to-v5.md.

v5 → v6 (most common fixes)

# 1. Mock assertions: removed verbs — rename (old -> new):
#    Assert-MockCalled     -> Should -Invoke
#    Assert-VerifiableMock -> Should -InvokeVerifiable
Should -Invoke Get-Thing -Times 1 -Exactly
Should -InvokeVerifiable

# 2. Add a default mock — unmatched calls no longer run the real command
Mock Get-Thing { 'default' }
Mock Get-Thing -ParameterFilter { $Name -eq 'a' } -MockWith { 'a' }

# 3. Empty/$null -ForEach now throws; allow it only where empty is expected
Describe 'Optional' -ForEach $cases -AllowNullOrEmptyForEach { }

# 4. Combine duplicate BeforeAll/BeforeEach/AfterAll/AfterEach in the same block into one

Full breaking-change list with symptoms and fixes: references/v5-to-v6.md.

Safety rules

  • Tests are the spec. Migration must not change what a test asserts — only how the suite is structured and invoked. If a test starts passing/failing differently for any reason other than a documented breaking change, investigate before accepting it.
  • Automated migration scripts produce false positives. The community scripts (linked in the references) help with Should syntax and dot-sourcing, but always review the diff and re-run the suite afterward. Never bulk-edit and commit unchecked.
  • Mind file encoding when scripting replacements over *.Tests.ps1 — preserve the original encoding (UTF-8 vs ASCII) so you don't mangle non-ASCII test names.
  • Work on a branch, commit per file/concern. Small commits keep git bisect useful if a migrated test goes red later.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Map an existing codebase into seven documents covering its technology, structure, architecture, conventions, integrations, tests, and concerns. Link findings to file evidence, mark unknowns, and highlight differences between stated plans and the actual implementation.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Get oriented in an unfamiliar codebase
  • Prepare documentation for a project handover
  • Compare documented architecture with implementation
github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月17日 更新

Assess a repository’s readiness for AI agents with AgentRC and generate a standalone HTML dashboard. Review scores across nine areas, see prioritized improvements, and optionally apply scoring policies tailored to an organization.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Assessing a repository’s readiness for AI agents
  • Prioritizing improvements from assessment results
  • Reviewing scores under an organization’s own policy
github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月17日 更新

Generate coding agent instruction files from a project's actual code using AgentRC. Capture detected languages, frameworks, and conventions in one shared file or split rules by topic and project area, with a preview before writing.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Create project instructions for VS Code Copilot
  • Refresh agent rules after project changes
  • Split monorepo instructions by project area
github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月17日 更新

Customize AgentRC readiness assessments to match team or organization standards. Choose or create policies that adjust check importance, disable irrelevant checks, set pass thresholds, and define requirements for automated checks in CI workflows.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Set shared readiness standards across an organization
  • Focus assessments on AI tooling
  • Adjust the importance of individual checks
github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月17日 更新

Analyze supplied ad performance data to identify wasted spend, strong campaigns, and next tests. Compare channels, assess whether test differences are meaningful, and produce budget reallocation recommendations with a prioritized action plan.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Identify ads and keywords to pause
  • Find campaigns and audiences worth scaling
  • Assess whether A/B test results are meaningful
github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月17日 更新

Turn code files into learning resources by adding comments that explain syntax, programming concepts, and design choices. Adjust explanation depth and repetition to the reader’s knowledge while preserving file structure, encoding, and syntax.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Add beginner-friendly explanations to existing code
  • Document the reasoning behind syntax and design choices
  • Adjust comment depth for readers with different experience
github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月17日 更新

查看 github 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题