跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

client-compatibility

Adapt Squad agent coordination to the available Copilot interface. Detect supported tools, choose how to launch helper agents and collect results, and use file-based state for workflows that must work across interfaces.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

Platform detection and adaptive spawning for CLI vs VS Code vs other surfaces

查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Adapting agent coordination between CLI and VS Code
  • Launching multiple helper agents in VS Code
  • Managing shared state without the CLI-only SQL tool
  • Continuing work when helper agent tools are unavailable

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md5.3 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Context

Squad runs on multiple Copilot surfaces (CLI, VS Code, JetBrains, GitHub.com). The coordinator must detect its platform and adapt spawning behavior accordingly. Different tools are available on different platforms, requiring conditional logic for agent spawning, SQL usage, and response timing.

Patterns

Platform Detection

Before spawning agents, determine the platform by checking available tools:

  1. CLI mode — task tool is available → full spawning control. Use task with agent_type, mode, model, description, prompt parameters. Collect results via read_agent.

  2. VS Code mode — runSubagent or agent tool is available → conditional behavior. Use runSubagent with the task prompt. Drop agent_type, mode, and model parameters. Multiple subagents in one turn run concurrently (equivalent to background mode). Results return automatically — no read_agent needed.

  3. Fallback mode — neither task nor runSubagent/agent available → work inline. Do not apologize or explain the limitation. Execute the task directly.

If both task and runSubagent are available, prefer task (richer parameter surface).

VS Code Spawn Adaptations

When in VS Code mode, the coordinator changes behavior in these ways:

  • Spawning tool: Use runSubagent instead of task. The prompt is the only required parameter — pass the full agent prompt (charter, identity, task, hygiene, response order) exactly as you would on CLI.
  • Parallelism: Spawn ALL concurrent agents in a SINGLE turn. They run in parallel automatically. This replaces mode: "background" + read_agent polling.
  • Model selection: Accept the session model. Do NOT attempt per-spawn model selection or fallback chains — they only work on CLI. In Phase 1, all subagents use whatever model the user selected in VS Code's model picker.
  • Scribe: Cannot fire-and-forget. Batch Scribe as the LAST subagent in any parallel group. Scribe is light work (file ops only), so the blocking is tolerable.
  • Launch table: Skip it. Results arrive with the response, not separately. By the time the coordinator speaks, the work is already done.
  • read_agent: Skip entirely. Results return automatically when subagents complete.
  • agent_type: Drop it. All VS Code subagents have full tool access by default. Subagents inherit the parent's tools.
  • description: Drop it. The agent name is already in the prompt.
  • Prompt content: Keep ALL prompt structure — charter, identity, task, hygiene, response order blocks are surface-independent.

Feature Degradation Table

FeatureCLIVS CodeDegradation
Parallel fan-outmode: "background" + read_agentMultiple subagents in one turnNone — equivalent concurrency
Model selectionPer-spawn model param (4-layer hierarchy)Session model only (Phase 1)Accept session model, log intent
Scribe fire-and-forgetBackground, never readSync, must waitBatch with last parallel group
Launch table UXShow table → results laterSkip table → results with responseUX only — results are correct
SQL toolAvailableNot availableAvoid SQL in cross-platform code paths
Response order bugCritical workaroundPossibly necessary (unverified)Keep the block — harmless if unnecessary

SQL Tool Caveat

The sql tool is CLI-only. It does not exist on VS Code, JetBrains, or GitHub.com. Any coordinator logic or agent workflow that depends on SQL (todo tracking, batch processing, session state) will silently fail on non-CLI surfaces. Cross-platform code paths must not depend on SQL. Use filesystem-based state (.squad/ files) for anything that must work everywhere.

Examples

Example 1: CLI parallel spawn

// Coordinator detects task tool available → CLI mode
task({ agent_type: "general-purpose", mode: "background", model: "claude-sonnet-4.5", ... })
task({ agent_type: "general-purpose", mode: "background", model: "claude-haiku-4.5", ... })
// Later: read_agent for both

Example 2: VS Code parallel spawn

// Coordinator detects runSubagent available → VS Code mode
runSubagent({ prompt: "...Fenster charter + task..." })
runSubagent({ prompt: "...Hockney charter + task..." })
runSubagent({ prompt: "...Scribe charter + task..." }) // Last in group
// Results return automatically, no read_agent

Example 3: Fallback mode

// Neither task nor runSubagent available → work inline
// Coordinator executes the task directly without spawning

Anti-Patterns

  • ❌ Using SQL tool in cross-platform workflows (breaks on VS Code/JetBrains/GitHub.com)
  • ❌ Attempting per-spawn model selection on VS Code (Phase 1 — only session model works)
  • ❌ Fire-and-forget Scribe on VS Code (must batch as last subagent)
  • ❌ Showing launch table on VS Code (results already inline)
  • ❌ Apologizing or explaining platform limitations to the user
  • ❌ Using task when only runSubagent is available
  • ❌ Dropping prompt structure (charter/identity/task) on non-CLI platforms

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Coordinate work across AI agents with shared rules for locating team files, recording decisions and their reasons, and requesting help. It also defines who owns revisions after a reviewer rejects an artifact.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Locate team files across separate working directories
  • Record decisions that affect other agents
  • Request input from another specialist
github/gh-aw54222026年10月19日 更新

Set shared development rules for an agent team: keep specific agent names out of product code, tests, and CI configuration, verify affected tests before finishing, and record lessons learned from mistakes.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Share development rules across multiple agents
  • Keep team-specific agent names out of code and tests
  • Check affected tests before declaring work complete
github/gh-aw54222026年10月19日 更新

Routes requests to design, create, update, debug, or upgrade GitHub Agentic Workflows to the appropriate instructions. It helps the agent select a workflow-specific procedure and apply any additional rules defined for the repository.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Designing a new workflow through questions
  • Investigating failed runs and recurring errors
  • Upgrading workflows and addressing deprecations
github/gh-aw54222026年10月19日 更新

Prepare architecture proposals before implementation so the team can agree on a direction. Organize evidence, technical choices, effects on existing work, risks, and the first release’s scope into a document with clear recommendations and decision owners.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Proposing a major architecture change
  • Replanning milestones after a foundation change
  • Comparing technical options before seeking approval
github/gh-aw54222026年10月19日 更新

Update the gh-aw-firewall version used by gh-aw, rebuild generated files, and review release notes and configuration schemas, which define valid settings. It guides related code and test updates while identifying follow-up work that remains.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Updating the firewall version used by gh-aw
  • Reviewing release notes for integration changes
  • Checking configuration schema differences
github/gh-aw54222026年10月19日 更新

Review git and gh operations in gh-aw workflows to check credential availability for each repository. Identify missing token handoffs, risky expansions of limited checkouts, and error handling needed where credentials are intentionally unavailable.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Reviewing git operations after repository checkout
  • Checking tokens for private cross-repository access
  • Reviewing sparse and shallow checkout changes
github/gh-aw54222026年10月19日 更新

查看 github 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题