跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

coordinator-init-mode

Set up a Squad agent team in a repository that has no team yet. Propose roles and persistent names, obtain user confirmation, then create team files, shared context, built-in member policies, and merge settings for accumulated records.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

The complete two-phase Init Mode protocol the Squad coordinator runs when no team exists yet in the current repo. Phase 1 = propose the team (no files created, wait for user confirm). Phase 2 = create .squad/ scaffolding, casting state, .gitattributes for merge drivers, and the always-on built-ins (Scribe, Ralph, Rai, Fact Checker). Loaded on demand when the coordinator detects no .squad/team.md exists.

查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Creating a Squad team in a new repository
  • Choosing agent roles for a project’s technology stack
  • Giving new agents shared project context
  • Configuring merges for decisions, memories, and logs

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md7.7 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Load this skill when: you detect that no .squad/team.md exists in the resolved team root — that means this is a fresh repo or a repo that has never been squadified, and Init Mode is the right path. The short stub in squad.agent.md tells you to load this skill; the full two-phase protocol lives here.

⚠️ Eager-execution exception: Init Mode is the ONE exception to the eager-execution / parallel-fan-out doctrine. Phase 1 MUST end with a user confirmation before any file is created. Do not bypass.

Phase 1: Propose the Team

No team exists yet. Propose one — but DO NOT create any files until the user confirms.

  1. Identify the user. Run git config user.name to learn who you're working with. Use their name in conversation (e.g., "Hey {user}, what are you building?"). Store their name (NOT email) in team.md under Project Context. Never read or store git config user.email — email addresses are PII and must not be written to committed files.
  2. Ask: "What are you building? (language, stack, what it does)"
  3. Cast the team. Before proposing names, run the Casting & Persistent Naming algorithm (see the canonical Casting reference at .squad/templates/casting-reference.md):
    • Determine team size: pick 4–5 cast (user-domain) agents, then add the 4 always-on built-ins (Scribe + Ralph + Rai + Fact Checker — see their dedicated sections in squad.agent.md). A typical fresh squad has 8–9 total roster entries, not 4–5.
    • Determine assignment shape from the user's project description.
    • Derive resonance signals from the session and repo context.
    • Select a universe. Allocate character names from that universe.
    • Scribe is always "Scribe" — exempt from casting.
    • Ralph is always "Ralph" — exempt from casting.
    • Rai is always "Rai" — exempt from casting.
    • Fact Checker is always "Fact Checker" — exempt from casting (same pattern as Scribe / Ralph / Rai).
  4. Propose the team with their cast names. Example (names will vary per cast):
🏗️  {CastName1}  — Lead          Scope, decisions, code review
⚛️  {CastName2}  — Frontend Dev  React, UI, components
🔧  {CastName3}  — Backend Dev   APIs, database, services
🧪  {CastName4}  — Tester        Tests, quality, edge cases
📋  Scribe       — (silent)      Memory, decisions, session logs
🔄  Ralph        — (monitor)     Work queue, backlog, keep-alive
🛡️  Rai         — (background)  RAI awareness, content safety
🔍  Fact Checker — (verifier)    Verification + Devil's Advocate
  1. Use the ask_user tool to confirm the roster. Provide choices so the user sees a selectable menu.

    The question must be self-contained because the client may render the blocking input request without the assistant text that preceded it.

    The question must reuse every roster line from the exact proposal emitted in step 4, in the same order. Do not regenerate, summarize, truncate, omit, or replace any roster row with an ellipsis. Every proposed member must appear with their emoji, cast name, role, and concise responsibility/scope — including all four always-on built-ins (Scribe, Ralph, Rai, Fact Checker).

    Shape:

    Confirm this team (universe: {ActualUniverse}):
    
    {Every roster line from step 4, copied in full and in order}
    
    Look right?
    

    Never use a bare "Look right?" question and never rely on preceding assistant output to identify the team being confirmed.

    • choices: ["Yes, hire this team", "Add someone", "Change a role"]

⚠️ STOP. Your response ENDS here. Do NOT proceed to Phase 2. Do NOT create any files or directories. Wait for the user's reply.


Phase 2: Create the Team

Trigger: The user replied to Phase 1 with confirmation ("yes", "looks good", or similar affirmative), OR the user's reply to Phase 1 is a task (treat as implicit "yes").

If the user said "add someone" or "change a role," go back to Phase 1 step 3 and re-propose. Do NOT enter Phase 2 until the user confirms.

  1. Create the .squad/ directory structure (see .squad/templates/ for format guides or use the standard structure: team.md, routing.md, ceremonies.md, decisions.md, decisions/inbox/, casting/, agents/, orchestration-log/, skills/, log/, rai/).

Casting state initialization: Copy .squad/templates/casting-policy.json to .squad/casting/policy.json (or create from defaults). Create registry.json (entries: persistent_name, universe, created_at, legacy_named: false, status: "active") and history.json (first assignment snapshot with unique assignment_id).

Seeding: Each agent's history.md starts with the project description, tech stack, and the user's name so they have day-1 context. Agent folder names are the cast name in lowercase (e.g., .squad/agents/ripley/). The Scribe's charter includes maintaining decisions.md and cross-agent context sharing. Rai's charter is seeded from the Rai-charter.md template, and .squad/rai/policy.md is seeded from rai-policy.md. Fact Checker's charter is seeded from fact-checker-charter.md and .squad/fact-checker/policy.md is seeded from fact-checker-policy.md.

Team.md structure: team.md MUST contain a section titled exactly ## Members (not "## Team Roster" or other variations) containing the roster table. This header is hard-coded in GitHub workflows (squad-heartbeat.yml, squad-issue-assign.yml, squad-triage.yml, sync-squad-labels.yml) for label automation. If the header is missing or titled differently, label routing breaks.

Merge driver for append-only files: Create or update .gitattributes at the repo root to enable conflict-free merging of .squad/ state across branches:

.squad/decisions.md merge=union
.squad/agents/*/history.md merge=union
.squad/log/** merge=union
.squad/orchestration-log/** merge=union
.squad/rai/audit-trail.md merge=union

The union merge driver keeps all lines from both sides, which is correct for append-only files. This makes worktree-local strategy work seamlessly when branches merge — decisions, memories, and logs from all branches combine automatically.

  1. Say: "✅ Team hired. Try: '{FirstCastName}, set up the project structure'"

  2. Post-setup input sources (optional — ask after team is created, not during casting):

    • PRD/spec: "Do you have a PRD or spec document? (file path, paste it, or skip)" → If provided, follow PRD Mode flow.
    • GitHub issues: "Is there a GitHub repo with issues I should pull from? (owner/repo, or skip)" → If provided, follow GitHub Issues Mode flow.
    • Human members: "Are any humans joining the team? (names and roles, or just AI for now)" → If provided, add per Human Team Members section.
    • Copilot agent: "Want to include @copilot? It can pick up issues autonomously. (yes/no)" → If yes, follow Copilot Coding Agent Member section and ask about auto-assignment.
    • These are additive. Don't block — if the user skips or gives a task instead, proceed immediately.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Coordinate work across AI agents with shared rules for locating team files, recording decisions and their reasons, and requesting help. It also defines who owns revisions after a reviewer rejects an artifact.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Locate team files across separate working directories
  • Record decisions that affect other agents
  • Request input from another specialist
github/gh-aw54222026年10月19日 更新

Set shared development rules for an agent team: keep specific agent names out of product code, tests, and CI configuration, verify affected tests before finishing, and record lessons learned from mistakes.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Share development rules across multiple agents
  • Keep team-specific agent names out of code and tests
  • Check affected tests before declaring work complete
github/gh-aw54222026年10月19日 更新

Routes requests to design, create, update, debug, or upgrade GitHub Agentic Workflows to the appropriate instructions. It helps the agent select a workflow-specific procedure and apply any additional rules defined for the repository.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Designing a new workflow through questions
  • Investigating failed runs and recurring errors
  • Upgrading workflows and addressing deprecations
github/gh-aw54222026年10月19日 更新

Prepare architecture proposals before implementation so the team can agree on a direction. Organize evidence, technical choices, effects on existing work, risks, and the first release’s scope into a document with clear recommendations and decision owners.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Proposing a major architecture change
  • Replanning milestones after a foundation change
  • Comparing technical options before seeking approval
github/gh-aw54222026年10月19日 更新

Update the gh-aw-firewall version used by gh-aw, rebuild generated files, and review release notes and configuration schemas, which define valid settings. It guides related code and test updates while identifying follow-up work that remains.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Updating the firewall version used by gh-aw
  • Reviewing release notes for integration changes
  • Checking configuration schema differences
github/gh-aw54222026年10月19日 更新

Review git and gh operations in gh-aw workflows to check credential availability for each repository. Identify missing token handoffs, risky expansions of limited checkouts, and error handling needed where credentials are intentionally unavailable.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Reviewing git operations after repository checkout
  • Checking tokens for private cross-repository access
  • Reviewing sparse and shallow checkout changes
github/gh-aw54222026年10月19日 更新

查看 github 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题