跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

ad-to-landing-page-auditor

Analyze the message match between your ads and landing pages. Checks if the promise in the ad copy carries through to the landing page headline, body, and CTA. Flags disconnects that kill conversion rates. Works with Google, Meta, and LinkedIn ads.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

集成工具LinkedIn

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

包含的文件(2)

  • SKILL.md6.7 KB
  • skill.meta.json343 B

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Ad-to-Landing Page Auditor

The #1 reason ads get clicks but not conversions: the landing page doesn't deliver on the ad's promise. This skill audits the full click path — from ad copy to landing page experience — and flags every disconnect.

Core principle: A great ad with a mismatched landing page is worse than a mediocre ad with a matched one. Message match is the single biggest conversion lever most startups ignore.

When to Use

  • "Why are my ads getting clicks but no conversions?"
  • "Audit my ad-to-landing page flow"
  • "Check message match on our campaigns"
  • "My conversion rate is low — help me figure out why"
  • "Review our landing pages for our ad campaigns"

Phase 0: Intake

  1. Ad copy — For each ad, provide:
    • Headline(s)
    • Body / description text
    • CTA text
    • Platform (Google Search / Meta / LinkedIn)
  2. Landing page URLs — The URL each ad points to
  3. Conversion goal — What should happen after someone clicks? (Demo / Trial / Purchase / Download)
  4. Known conversion rates? — Current click → conversion rate per ad/LP (if available)

If the user has a CSV export from their ad platform, parse that instead.

Phase 1: Ad Inventory

Parse the provided ads into:

Ad IDPlatformHeadlineBody/DescriptionCTALanding Page URLConv Rate (if known)

Phase 2: Landing Page Audit

For each unique landing page URL, fetch the page content:

fetch_webpage: [landing_page_url]

If fetch_webpage is not available, use curl to retrieve the page HTML.

Extract and score:

2A: Content Elements

ElementFound?Content
Hero headline[Y/N]"[Text]"
Subheadline[Y/N]"[Text]"
Primary CTA[Y/N]"[Button text]"
CTA above fold[Y/N]—
Social proof[Y/N][Logos / testimonials / metrics]
Benefit list[Y/N][Key benefits listed]
Form / Sign-up[Y/N][Field count: N]
Video[Y/N]—
Trust signals[Y/N][Security badges, guarantees]

2B: Message Match Scoring

For each ad → landing page pair, score on:

DimensionScore (1-10)Criteria
Promise continuity[X]Does the LP headline deliver on the ad's promise?
Language match[X]Does the LP use the same words/phrases as the ad?
Visual continuity[X]Does the LP feel like a continuation of the ad? (Not assessable for search)
CTA alignment[X]Does the LP's ask match what the ad implied?
Specificity match[X]If the ad was specific ("for sales teams"), is the LP specific too?
Emotional match[X]If the ad used fear/urgency, does the LP carry that forward?

Message Match Score: [Average/60]

Scoring Guide

ScoreRatingMeaning
50-60ExcellentStrong match — LP delivers on every ad promise
40-49GoodMinor disconnects but overall coherent
30-39Needs workNoticeable gaps — visitor has to hunt for relevance
20-29PoorAd and LP feel like different products
Below 20CriticalComplete mismatch — fix immediately

Phase 3: Conversion Friction Analysis

Beyond message match, assess landing page conversion friction:

Friction TypeCheckStatus
Load timeDoes the page feel heavy/slow? (Asset count proxy)[Fast/Slow/Unknown]
Form lengthHow many fields before conversion?[N fields] — [Appropriate/Too many]
CTA clarityIs there one clear CTA or competing actions?[Clear/Cluttered]
Above-fold conversionCan someone convert without scrolling?[Yes/No]
Social proof placementIs proof near the CTA?[Yes/No]
Navigation distractionDoes the LP have full site nav? (Should be minimal)[Minimal/Full nav]
Mobile experienceAny mobile-unfriendly elements?[Good/Issues]

Phase 4: Output Format

# Ad-to-Landing Page Audit — [Product/Client] — [DATE]

Ads audited: [N]
Unique landing pages: [N]
Platform(s): [Google / Meta / LinkedIn]
Overall message match: [Score/60] — [Rating]

---

## Executive Summary

[3-4 sentences: Overall finding, biggest disconnect, top recommendation, estimated conversion impact]

---

## Audit Results by Ad → Landing Page Pair

### Ad 1: "[Ad headline excerpt]"
**Platform:** [Google Search / Meta / LinkedIn]
**Ad copy:**
> Headline: "[text]"
> Body: "[text]"
> CTA: "[text]"

**Landing page:** [URL]
> LP headline: "[text]"
> LP subhead: "[text]"
> LP CTA: "[button text]"

**Message Match Score: [X/60] — [Rating]**

| Dimension | Score | Issue |
|-----------|-------|-------|
| Promise continuity | [X/10] | [Specific finding] |
| Language match | [X/10] | [Specific finding] |
| CTA alignment | [X/10] | [Specific finding] |
| Specificity match | [X/10] | [Specific finding] |
| Emotional match | [X/10] | [Specific finding] |

**Disconnect found:** [Specific description of mismatch]
**Recommended fix:** [Specific change to ad or LP]

### Ad 2: ...

---

## Landing Page Friction Report

### [Landing Page URL]
| Friction Point | Status | Impact | Fix |
|---------------|--------|--------|-----|
| [Friction] | [Red/Yellow/Green] | [High/Med/Low] | [Specific fix] |

---

## Priority Fixes

### Critical (Fix This Week)
1. **[Ad/LP pair]:** [Specific mismatch] → [Specific fix]
   - Est. conversion impact: [X% improvement]

### Important (Fix This Month)
2. **[Issue]:** [Fix]

### Nice-to-Have
3. **[Issue]:** [Fix]

---

## Rewrite Suggestions

### For [Ad or LP with worst match]:

**Current ad headline:** "[current]"
**Suggested ad headline:** "[rewrite that matches LP]"

OR

**Current LP headline:** "[current]"
**Suggested LP headline:** "[rewrite that matches ad]"

Save to ad-lp-audit-[YYYY-MM-DD].md in the current working directory (or user-specified path).

Cost

ComponentCost
Landing page fetchingFree
AnalysisFree (LLM reasoning)
TotalFree

Tools Required

  • fetch_webpage or curl — for landing page analysis
  • No API keys required

Trigger Phrases

  • "Audit my ad-to-landing page match"
  • "Why is my conversion rate so low?"
  • "Check message match on our campaigns"
  • "Do our landing pages match our ads?"
  • "Run a CRO audit on our ad funnels"

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Research supported advertising promises from a specific buyer's context, current product facts, customer language and observed ads. Turn them into static, video or copy ideas; match video ideas to actual recipes and save a product-scoped angle bank for write-video-ad-script. Product-led discovery can use verified facts without reviews. Reference persistence and reach are observations, not proof of performance.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills12652026年10月24日 更新

Analyze ad campaign performance data (Google, Meta, LinkedIn) to identify what's working, what's wasting budget, and specific cut/scale/test recommendations. Runs statistical analysis, funnel diagnostics, and multi-channel budget reallocation with specific dollar-amount shift recommendations and scenario modeling.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills12652026年10月24日 更新

For paid lead-gen and participant-recruitment ads, replaces vanity CPA with true CAC per qualified lead by joining ad-platform data with downstream funnel events, surfaces tracking gaps, and classifies every creative into Scale / Keep / Investigate / Cut.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills12652026年10月24日 更新

The intake stage of a Meta ad harness. Researches the brand first, states what it assumes, and asks only what it cannot infer and what would change money, claims or legal exposure if guessed wrong — at most four questions a turn, in plain business language. Writes the brand's stable facts (ads/brand.md), the campaign brief, and a log of what was asked vs assumed. Use it when someone wants to run Meta ads and the brand's ad facts are not yet recorded.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills12652026年10月24日 更新

Checks paid ads against the ad platform's rules (Meta, TikTok, Google, LinkedIn and others) and the brand's category rules: the copy, on-image or on-screen text, pictures and people. Rewrites what can be fixed honestly, adds the disclosures that are needed, and flags anything that needs a human or legal review, with one pass, fixed or flag line per ad and platform. Use alone when you already have the ad text or images and know where they will run; otherwise run the playbook for the job (e.g. make-static-ads, make-content, email-lifecycle).

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills12652026年10月24日 更新

Turn a brand's facts, a campaign brief and the product into a one-minute Meta ad strategy with its reasoning — goal, audience, objective and placements, budget split, how many ads and how different they must be (generate 3x so the user can choose), the test frame, the success metric, and safety rules for the user to accept. Decides what launch-meta-ad-campaign then executes, and re-reads the strategy after a deep check to show which assumption changed. Use it after intake and before any creative is generated or any campaign is built.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills12652026年10月24日 更新

查看 gooseworks-ai 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题