免费在 GitHub 公开

research-proposal-development

Develop research proposals with solicitation alignment, reviewer-focused logic, evidence-bounded preliminary results, milestones, risks, and compelling figures. Use for federal, foundation, equipment, partnership, or internal research proposals.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

hanhuark/mechanical-engineering-research-skill

查看安装方法

包含的文件（3）

SKILL.md2.1 KB
agents/openai.yaml331 B
references/proposal-development.md21.9 KB

SKILL.md（原文）

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Research Proposal Development

Purpose

Turn an important research question into a reviewer-decision-ready proposal. Preserve the investigator's scientific direction and distinguish verified preliminary evidence, proposed work, assumptions, and collaborator-dependent commitments.

Route To Reference

Read references/proposal-development.md before drafting a full narrative, responding to review criteria, planning proposal figures, integrating preliminary results, or polishing a submission.

Workflow

Extract the solicitation's scope, eligibility, deadline, budget and duration constraints, required sections, evaluation criteria, and special requirements from primary sources.
Frame the need: high-value application or scientific barrier, current state, precise gap, reason it endures, and the proposed solution's testable advance.
Map every aim or thrust to a hypothesis, method, measurable success criterion, risk, mitigation, deliverable, and reviewer criterion.
Use preliminary results as evidence of feasibility, not proof of promised outcomes. Label planned partnerships, facilities, datasets, and external commitments unless confirmed.
Make the figure plan do work: system concept, evidence of feasibility, causal mechanism, work plan, and quantitative success metrics.

Writing Rules

Each paragraph should answer one reviewer question. Avoid generic impact claims, unexplained work packages, and a list of tasks that does not produce knowledge. Explain why the team, methodology, and timeline make the proposed advance credible.

Final Review

Check factual solicitation alignment, budget/timeline consistency, references, labels on preliminary versus proposed material, and all claimed collaborator, institutional, or facility commitments. Flag requirements that require institutional review rather than inventing compliance language.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问，或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

同一仓库的技能

mechanical-engineering-research

免费

Apply source-aware mechanical-engineering judgment to research, analysis, coding, writing, teaching, research identity, and release work. Use for thermal-fluid systems, heat transfer, fluid mechanics, thermodynamics, HVAC, energy systems, turbomachinery, piping, multiphase flow, experiments, correlations, CFD, reduced-order models, AI/ML, uncertainty, engineering datasets, literature reviews, citations, manuscripts, reviewer revisions, Overleaf packages, figures, proposals, research software, reproducibility, public releases, engineering teaching materials, or a research-project logo and visual identity.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。