跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

article-writing

Write articles, guides, blog posts, tutorials, newsletter issues, and other long-form content in a distinctive voice derived from supplied examples or brand guidance. Use when the user wants polished written content longer than a paragraph, especially when voice consistency, structure, and credibility matter.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

查看安装方法

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md3.5 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Article Writing

Write long-form content that sounds like an actual person with a point of view, not an LLM smoothing itself into paste.

When to Activate

  • drafting blog posts, essays, launch posts, guides, tutorials, or newsletter issues
  • turning notes, transcripts, or research into polished articles
  • matching an existing founder, operator, or brand voice from examples
  • tightening structure, pacing, and evidence in already-written long-form copy

Core Rules

  1. Lead with the concrete thing: artifact, example, output, anecdote, number, screenshot, or code.
  2. Explain after the example, not before.
  3. Keep sentences tight unless the source voice is intentionally expansive.
  4. Use proof instead of adjectives.
  5. Never invent facts, credibility, or customer evidence.

Voice Capture Workflow

If the user wants a specific voice, collect one or more of:

  • published articles
  • newsletters
  • X posts or threads
  • docs or memos
  • launch notes
  • a style guide

Then extract:

  • sentence length and rhythm
  • whether the writing is compressed, explanatory, sharp, or formal
  • how parentheses are used
  • how often the writer asks questions
  • whether the writer uses fragments, lists, or hard pivots
  • formatting habits such as headers, bullets, code blocks, pull quotes
  • what the writer clearly avoids

If no voice references are given, default to a sharp operator voice: concrete, unsentimental, useful.

Affaan / ECC Voice Reference

When matching Affaan / ECC voice, bias toward:

  • direct claims over scene-setting
  • high specificity
  • parentheticals used for qualification or over-clarification, not comedy
  • capitalization chosen situationally, not as a gimmick
  • very low tolerance for fake thought-leadership cadence
  • almost no bait questions

Banned Patterns

Delete and rewrite any of these:

  • "In today's rapidly evolving landscape"
  • "game-changer", "cutting-edge", "revolutionary"
  • "no fluff"
  • "not X, just Y"
  • "here's why this matters" as a standalone bridge
  • fake vulnerability arcs
  • a closing question added only to juice engagement
  • forced lowercase
  • corny parenthetical asides
  • biography padding that does not move the argument

Writing Process

  1. Clarify the audience and purpose.
  2. Build a hard outline with one job per section.
  3. Start sections with proof, artifact, conflict, or example.
  4. Expand only where the next sentence earns space.
  5. Cut anything that sounds templated, overexplained, or self-congratulatory.

Structure Guidance

Technical Guides

  • open with what the reader gets
  • use code, commands, screenshots, or concrete output in major sections
  • end with actionable takeaways, not a soft recap

Essays / Opinion

  • start with tension, contradiction, or a specific observation
  • keep one argument thread per section
  • make opinions answer to evidence

Newsletters

  • keep the first screen doing real work
  • do not front-load diary filler
  • use section labels only when they improve scanability

Quality Gate

Before delivering:

  • factual claims are backed by provided sources
  • generic AI transitions are gone
  • the voice matches the supplied examples
  • every section adds something new
  • formatting matches the intended medium

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Use AtomLane to compile and execute safe atomic parallel plans on macOS and native Windows Preview for worthwhile independent argv tasks, dependency DAGs, supported platform entrypoints, or Apple-silicon operators. Use at task start or an execution boundary when structured local work may contain two or more worthwhile units; skip plain answers, one quick command, and work whose effects cannot be safely bounded.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins13552026年10月19日 更新

add

免费

Register a deferred decision in the debt registry. Trigger by judgment, not a marker scan, whenever a future reader would ask "why this way?": an unmade decision, stub, loosened type, bypassed check, swallowed error, a default picked "for now", or a TODO/FIXME/HACK/XXX marker. Trigger immediately whenever you defer work, or when the user invokes $add. Over-register freely; the developer drops with "drop A", "drop A,C", or "drop all".

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins13552026年10月19日 更新

ADK 框架适配层。为 LangChain / EINO / AutoGen / AgentScope / CrewAI 提供框架特定的 代码模板、惯用模式、API 映射和项目结构,供 agent-dev-workshop Phase 5 代码生成使用。 每个框架 reference 文件标注 verified_date 用于版本锁定。

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins13552026年10月19日 更新

中文调试修复技能。用于报错、测试失败、页面异常、功能不符合预期、需要定位根因并做最小修复时。触发语包括"进入调试模式""帮我修问题""报错了""测试失败""页面坏了""找根因"。

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins13552026年10月19日 更新

交互式 AI Agent 开发工作坊:通过 6 阶段深度协作对话,引导用户完成 Agent 需求分析、架构设计、 工具定义、Prompt 与编排设计、代码生成、验证迭代,产出可直接运行的 Agent 项目。 框架无关设计优先,支持 LangChain / EINO / AutoGen / AgentScope / CrewAI 等 ADK 框架。

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins13552026年10月19日 更新

中文漂移审计技能。用于项目或学习过程变乱、上下文漂移、任务分叉、多个方案冲突、命名不一致、Codex 可能顺手改多了时。触发语包括"漂移检查""感觉跑偏了""项目变乱了""检查是否失控""分叉太多""上下文漂移"。

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins13552026年10月19日 更新

查看 hashgraph-online 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题