跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

concurrency-report

Report concurrency and parallelism for a session — how many agents ran in parallel, concurrency-lane utilization, peak parallel width, and serialization bottlenecks (sequential chains that could have run as parallel lanes) — using the Agent Monitor workflow intelligence API. Use when checking whether a multi-agent session used parallelism efficiently.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

包含的文件(2)

  • SKILL.md2.5 KB
  • agents/openai.yaml278 B

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Concurrency Report

Report on parallel execution for one Claude Code session: lanes, peak width, utilization, and where work serialized.

Input

The user provides: $ARGUMENTS

A session ID. If empty, fetch GET /api/sessions?limit=1 and report on the most recent session, stating which one.

Data Sources

EndpointReturns
GET /api/workflows/{sessionId}The concurrency dataset (overlapping agent execution lanes with start/end timing) and the complexity dataset (numeric score from depth, breadth, and tool diversity)

Report Sections

1. Parallelism Summary

From concurrency: number of distinct lanes, peak parallel width (max agents running simultaneously), and total agents. Pair with the complexity score to judge whether the parallelism matched the work's size. Lanes: N · Peak parallel: M · Agents: K · Complexity: S

2. Lane Timeline

A per-lane list of the agents that occupied each lane in order: Lane 1: explore (0–12s) → code-review (12–48s) Lane 2: debugger (5–30s) Show overlapping windows so simultaneity is visible.

3. Utilization

LaneBusy timeIdle timeUtilization %
Plus an overall utilization figure (busy lane-time / total lane-time).

4. Serialization Bottlenecks

Identify sequential chains where one agent waited on the previous despite no apparent dependency — candidates to run as parallel lanes. State the chain and the wall-clock time it cost. Only flag chains the concurrency timing data actually shows as sequential.

Output

  • Markdown tables for utilization; a fenced list for the lane timeline.
  • Durations in human units (e.g. 48s, 2m 10s); percentages to whole numbers.
  • Use ▲/▼ when comparing utilization against an even-distribution baseline.
  • Cite only timing returned by the API; never invent lane overlaps or durations.
  • If the session ran a single agent (no concurrency), say so plainly rather than inventing lanes.
  • If the dashboard is unreachable, tell the user to start it with npm start from the repo root.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Inspect fired CCAM alerts and manage alert rules for token thresholds, event patterns, inactivity, and status duration. Use when acknowledging alerts, creating or editing a rule, checking cooldowns, or connecting alert rules to webhook targets.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

hoangsonww/Claude-Code-Agent-Monitor11102026年10月23日 更新

Identify anomalous sessions using Agent Monitor data — cost outliers from the pricing engine, token anomalies (cache miss spikes, compaction baseline surges), unusual event type ratios (PreToolUse/PostToolUse gaps, APIError clusters), behavioral deviations from workflow intelligence (complexity score outliers, error propagation anomalies), and sessions with abnormal metadata (extreme turn_count, high thinking_blocks, zero turn_duration).

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

hoangsonww/Claude-Code-Agent-Monitor11102026年10月23日 更新

Produce a detailed report on APIError events from Agent Monitor data — counts over time, which sessions and models are affected, and the likely root cause (rate limits, overload/529, or context-window pressure) inferred from each event's summary and data payload. Use when API errors spike or when you need to explain why requests are failing.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

hoangsonww/Claude-Code-Agent-Monitor11102026年10月23日 更新

benchmark

免费

Benchmark one session (or a small recent set) against the rolling average using Agent Monitor data — cost, total tokens, tool count, and workflow complexity score — and report where each metric lands as a percentile of the population. Tells you whether a session was normal, cheap, or an outlier. Use when judging whether a session was typical or out of band.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

hoangsonww/Claude-Code-Agent-Monitor11102026年10月23日 更新

Define a spend budget for Claude Code and, optionally, create a cost alert rule that fires when usage crosses the limit, via POST /api/alerts/rules on the Agent Monitor dashboard. Reads current spend from /api/pricing/cost to size the budget sensibly and explains every rule field before writing. Use when setting a spend limit or wiring up a budget guardrail.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

hoangsonww/Claude-Code-Agent-Monitor11102026年10月23日 更新

Analyze prompt-cache effectiveness for Claude Code usage from the Agent Monitor dashboard — cache hit rate (total_cache_read / (total_cache_read + total_input)), cache_write vs cache_read reuse, cache-read vs cache-write spend, and the sessions with the poorest reuse. Pulls token totals from /api/analytics, per-session detail from /api/sessions, and dollar splits from /api/pricing/cost. Use when diagnosing cache spend or deciding whether prompt caching is paying off.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

hoangsonww/Claude-Code-Agent-Monitor11102026年10月23日 更新

查看 hoangsonww 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题