Deep strategic research engine — decomposes questions into parallel research threads, spawns multiple agents, and synthesizes into actionable strategic analysis
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Produce and continuously maintain ONE living review document for a multi-item session — a cockpit header (Progress checklist, Working folder, Context) plus per-item review cards that you approve or request changes on directly in the doc or side panel. Use whenever a session has multiple deliverables you need to review/approve (meeting-processing + planning, multi-ticket work, briefs with several drafts, any "do X, then plan/draft Y and Z"). The doc is the interaction surface: you edit it (or reply in chat) to approve/change; the agent keeps it live as work progresses.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
查看安装方法安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。
A single, living review document that doubles as the control surface for a session. Instead of scattering a meeting note here, a ticket there, two drafts in chat, everything lands in one file you can open in the Obsidian side panel (or Claude side panel) and drive: see progress at a glance, review each item in place, approve or request changes inline, and watch the doc update as the agent works. Mirrors a "co-work" cockpit (Progress / Working folder / Context).
Pairs with closed-loop (verification), harvest (learnings), and the V-model checkpoints. This skill governs how the deliverable is presented and driven, not the verification pipeline.
One doc per session. It opens with a cockpit, then one review card per item. Every artifact the session produces is linked from the Working folder table (fan-out to sub-files mid-run is fine; the cockpit is the single front door). Never hand the user "see files A, B, C" — hand them the cockpit.
Copy references/session-review-template.md. Save the working copy in the relevant project folder as YYYY-MM-DD-<slug>-review.md (or -plan.md).
Cockpit (top):
[N. Title](#n-title) using GitHub-slug rules (lowercase, spaces→-, drop punctuation/emoji). Keep item headings free of + # ← → ( ) so slugs stay clean single-hyphen and the links resolve in Obsidian + the Claude side panel.~/vault/... path or link (meeting note, this doc, evidence dir, external issues/PRs, posted messages).Review items (below): one card per item:
approve / your requested changes).Footer: "How to drive this doc" (approve/change mechanics + status vocabulary), so the doc is self-explaining.
Status vocabulary: ⏳ pending · 🔄 in progress · 📝 needs review · ✏️ changes requested · ✅ done · ⛔ blocked
updated: frontmatter + status line.Edits over full rewrites so your inline edits/approvals are never clobbered. Before editing, re-read the file — you may have typed approvals or change requests into 🗒 Your call or ticked boxes.The doc is the shared surface; you drive it two ways, both valid:
Distinguish draft items (agent proposes, waits — e.g. a Slack message you own sending) from auto items (agent may execute directly — e.g. filing a GitHub issue you explicitly asked for). Draft items stay 📝 until approved; auto items go straight to ✅ with the artifact linked. When unsure whether an item is draft or auto, leave it 📝.
Read-only for the doc itself, but the items it tracks often mutate external state — obey each item's own post-condition (fetch back the issue, confirm the Slack message landed, etc.) and record the verified link in the Decision log. Never mark ✅ from a mutation call alone.
The markdown doc is primary (you edit it to approve). If you want a richer at-a-glance view, additionally render an HTML Artifact of the cockpit (Progress + Working folder + Context + item statuses) — but the markdown stays the source of truth and the editable surface.
还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。
无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。
还没有评论。来写第一条吧。
Deep strategic research engine — decomposes questions into parallel research threads, spawns multiple agents, and synthesizes into actionable strategic analysis
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Quick capture of raw thoughts with intelligent domain classification and competitive intelligence extraction
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Run one task through the V-model verification loop: CP-2 plan → CP-3 build → CP-3v component verify → CP-4 integration verify (full lane) → CP-5 acceptance. The worker never grades its own homework; evidence rows trace back to AC-n. Opt-in: invoke with /closed-loop or by asking for the closed loop, proper verification, or an evidence trail. Ordinary work does not run this.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Deep-dive 7-day analysis across all data sources for weekly reviews, board prep, and strategic planning
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Autonomous content pipeline - scout announcements in your field, triage by trend momentum and personal angle, produce posts/blogs/videos in your voice with ledger-based dedup, hard volume caps, and screenshot-verified publishing
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Create user stories with duplicate checking across any project tracker (Linear, GitHub Issues, Jira)
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。