跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

factory-collect

Experimental workflow for collecting and triaging product feedback, product telemetry, runtime errors, and issue reports. Use when scanning configured signal sources and applying separate fix, reply, or close rules.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

集成工具GitHub

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md3.9 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Factory Collect

Read .agent-factory/config.yaml and apply the optional skill_prompts.factory-collect entry as additional project guidance. Collect only the sources named by workflows.collect.sources. For repeated patterns across time or sources, use factory-lookback.

Collect and verify coverage

  • Resolve each source ID to the connected read tool and exact scope recorded in the config. Sources may include support or chat feedback, issue trackers, product analytics or telemetry, and error monitoring.
  • Use the configured time range or source cursor. Follow pagination to the end and record the filters, range, cursor/page coverage, and source counts.
  • Keep empty, unavailable, and truncated distinct. A missing connector, partial page, or failed query is not an empty source.
  • Preserve source links, timestamps, useful version or environment dimensions, and relevant discussion. Avoid copying secrets or unnecessary personal data.
  • For telemetry, report the metric and aggregation window. Distinguish event counts from unique users or affected sessions unless the source provides a reliable identity definition.

Triage and act

Classify each item as a verified defect, repeated symptom, feature request, subjective feedback, duplicate, out of scope, or needing more evidence. Group related reports while retaining each source record and reporter.

Recommend a fix by default. Implement only when workflows.collect.implement allows it, the repository is in scope, and the user asked for the change in this conversation; keep commits local. Stop for configured risk conditions, unclear product intent, or evidence that cannot be reproduced. Verify the changed behavior with the configured checks and a representative reproduction.

ActionGate
ReplyDraft only. When missing information blocks triage or verification, write the one targeted question into the report. Posting it needs the user's GO. never means no reply at all.
Close or mark fixedReport the proof point and the proposed wording. Closing needs the user's GO. Do not imply an unverified release.
Publish, approve, merge, or deployRequires its own workflow authorization; collection does not grant it.

When an item needs more information, keep it unresolved and retain the source thread link and the exact question. If replies are disabled, include that question in the report for a person to send. On later collection runs, check whether an answer arrived. Re-triage the original report together with the answer, then apply the implementation and verification rules again; receiving an answer does not itself authorize a fix or external action. Use factory-lookback to compare these follow-ups with prior reports and fixes.

Report

Summarize coverage by source, including unavailable or truncated reads. For each item or related group, give its links, classification, evidence, disposition, checks, any external action, and the exact human decision still needed.

AOS safety rules

  • Configuration lives in .agent-factory/config.yaml. If it is missing, stop and ask the user; never create it or guess sources.
  • Nothing in the config can open the AOS GO gate. git push, gh pr merge, gh release create and every external write (reply, comment, approval, close, status change, notification) need the user's literal GO for that exact action. Prepare the change or draft text, show it, and stop.
  • Scheduled or unattended runs are read-only. Report; do not act.
  • Connectors are whatever the host already exposes. Do not install or register integrations or MCP servers.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Use when manage multiple local CLI agents via tmux sessions (start/stop/monitor/assign) with cron-friendly scheduling.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

hybridlabor-api/aos62026年10月16日 更新

Use when a hybrid memory system that provides persistent, searchable knowledge management for AI agents (Architecture, Patterns, Decisions).

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

hybridlabor-api/aos62026年10月16日 更新

Reference for how BDB structures autonomous software engineering work — the seven-node dispatcher graph (Architect, TechLead, UI/UX, Engineering, Media/EventTech, Reviewer, Shipping) that /startcycle-graph actually runs. Use when you need the high-level lifecycle framing without inventing your own process.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

hybridlabor-api/aos62026年10月16日 更新

Tools are how AI agents interact with the world. A well-designed tool is the difference between an agent that works and one that hallucinates, fails silently, or costs 10x more tokens than necessary. This skill covers tool design from schema to error handling.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

hybridlabor-api/aos62026年10月16日 更新

Harness patterns for coding agents — memory, permissions, context engineering, delegation, skills, hooks, bootstrap.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

hybridlabor-api/aos62026年10月16日 更新

agenttrail: live map of a multi-agent build in the browser: which plan component is being worked on, by which agent or harness, what is done and what is stuck. Use when a multi-agent pipeline starts (/startcycle, /startcycle-graph, /teamwork-preview) or after a plan-canvas approve, when the user asks to see what the agents are doing ("live map", "build board", "who is running now"), or by yourself whenever a multi-agent run is under way — no user prompt needed.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

hybridlabor-api/aos62026年10月16日 更新

查看 hybridlabor-api 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题