跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

playwright-debugging

Diagnostic Playwright workflows for flaky or failing tests, including trace analysis, UI mode, and state isolation.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

集成工具Playwright
查看安装方法

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md6.6 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Playwright Debugging

Flaky Test Diagnosis and Repair

Overview

Use this skill when a Playwright test fails intermittently, behaves differently in CI, or passes locally but not in a repeatable way. The goal is to identify the specific cause of the failure before changing the test.

Use this skill as the first stop for failures. It is not a rewrite guide and it is not a replacement for playwright-core when the test still needs normal authoring discipline.

This skill focuses on four common failure classes: timing and readiness issues, state bleed between tests, hydration or rendering gaps in SPA frameworks, and flakiness that only appears under CI's specific constraints.

Do not use this skill to redesign a test from scratch unless the current test is beyond repair or the user explicitly asks for a rewrite.

When to Use

  • When a test fails only in CI or only on some runs.
  • When a click, assertion, or navigation happens before the UI is ready.
  • When a test depends on data, cookies, or local storage left behind by another test.
  • When the app renders before it becomes interactive.

When Not to Use

  • When you are writing a new test from scratch.
  • When the current test is already stable and the task is just to add new coverage.
  • When the app behavior itself needs redesign rather than a narrow test repair.

Diagnostic Workflow

Start with evidence. Use the failing error, the trace viewer, or the exact step that failed before choosing a fix.

  1. Capture the terminal error or the trace step that failed.
  2. Decide whether the failure is caused by timing, state bleed, hydration, or a CI-only constraint.
  3. Fix the narrowest failing line first.
  4. Verify the fix with a repeatable run, not a single green pass.

If the failing step is ambiguous, inspect the trace before editing. Do not generalize from one red run.

Common Failure Modes

Timing and Readiness

The UI is present, but the app is not ready for interaction yet. In this case, wait for the state the user would observe, not for an arbitrary timer.

Use web-first assertions, actionability checks, or a specific network response instead of waitForTimeout().

import { test, expect } from '@playwright/test';

test('submits the form after the data load completes', async ({ page }) => {
  const responsePromise = page.waitForResponse('**/api/v1/data-load');

  await page.goto('/dashboard');
  await responsePromise;

  await expect(page.getByRole('button', { name: 'Submit' })).toBeEnabled();
  await page.getByRole('button', { name: 'Submit' }).click();
});

State Bleed

The test depends on data that another test created or failed to clean up. Make the test self-contained by setting up its own data, storage state, or API state.

Prefer test-local setup over cross-test ordering. If the state comes from login, use a saved storage state. If it comes from application data, create it within the test or through a setup step.

Hydration and Rendering Gaps

The DOM appears before event handlers or framework state are attached. Wait for the interactive signal, not just the presence of elements.

This often shows up in React, Next.js, or other SPA frameworks when text is visible before a button is actually usable.

CI-Specific Flakiness

A test that is stable locally but flaky only in CI is not the same problem as timing, state bleed, or hydration on their own — it usually means a fix that works on a single local run doesn't hold up under CI's actual constraints: parallel workers competing for resources, shared services under load, and machines slower than a dev laptop.

Do not assume a local pass means the underlying fix is complete. Before closing out a CI-only flake, check for:

  • Worker contention — multiple parallel workers hitting the same route, database row, or rate-limited endpoint at once. Isolate per-worker state (for example, keying test data off test.info().workerIndex) instead of tightening a timeout.
  • Slower, not just different, timing — CI machines are frequently slower than local hardware, not only less predictable. A wait tied to a real condition (assertion, response, URL) survives this; a hardcoded timeout tuned on a local machine does not.
  • Environment drift — feature flags, seed data, or environment variables that differ between a local .env and CI secrets. Confirm the test isn't passing locally only because of state that doesn't exist in CI.
  • Retries masking a real bug — Playwright's CI retry setting can hide a genuine flake behind a "passed on retry" result. Treat a test that only passes on retry as still broken, not resolved.

Reproduce the CI failure mode locally under real constraints instead of guessing:

npx playwright test --workers=4 --repeat-each=10

If the failure only reproduces under load or parallelism, the fix belongs in resource isolation or wait strategy, not in a longer timeout.

Recommended Tools

  • Trace Viewer for post-run inspection of the exact failing step.
  • UI mode when the failure needs interactive inspection.
  • --repeat-each to prove a fix is stable.
  • --trace on when the issue needs a replayable record.
  • CI trace/video artifacts from the actual failing run, not just a local reproduction — a local repro that doesn't match the CI trace is not yet confirmed as the same failure.

Repair Patterns

  • Replace an arbitrary sleep with a specific assertion or response wait.
  • Replace a brittle locator with a user-facing role, label, placeholder, or text query.
  • Replace a one-off click failure with a readiness check on the element or the data behind it.
  • Isolate the failing line instead of rewriting the whole test.

If the symptom points to app state rather than locator choice, confirm whether the test needs a setup project, a route mock, or a proper reset between runs before making the test more complex.

Verification

After the fix, confirm the failure no longer reproduces under repetition.

Typical checks:

npx playwright test tests/example.spec.ts --repeat-each=5
npx playwright test tests/example.spec.ts --ui

Use the trace viewer to confirm the original failure mode is gone and that the fix matches the observed state change.

If the failure was intermittent, keep the repeat count high enough to make a false green unlikely. One passing run is not enough evidence for a flake repair. If the flake was CI-only, verify with --workers set to match your CI configuration, not just --repeat-each alone.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Playwright workflows for authenticated browser state reuse through storageState and setup projects.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

hzijad/playwright-agent-skills92026年7月16日 更新

Conducts rigorous authoring and review of Playwright E2E tests. Enforces accessibility-first locators, web-first assertions, strict isolation, and DAMP architecture. Use when generating, refactoring, or reviewing any Playwright test code.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

hzijad/playwright-agent-skills92026年7月16日 更新

Playwright workflows for deterministic third-party responses using page.route().

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

hzijad/playwright-agent-skills92026年7月16日 更新

查看 hzijad 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题