Use when an existing repository contains agents, prompts, workflows, playbooks, commands, or Skills and you need to identify which capabilities are worth converting into a ChatGPT/Codex Plugin.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use when a ChatGPT/Codex Plugin workflow needs deterministic computation, file processing, repository checks, package inspection, or other work that should be actually executed with host-native Python instead of answered from unverified reasoning.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
查看安装方法安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。
Use the host's own Python execution capability to produce evidence, not just code suggestions.
OpenAI calls Code Interpreter the python tool. In ChatGPT, when that tool is available for the current conversation, use it for the execution steps in this Skill. In Codex, use the host execution environment available to the session and run Python there when Python is the appropriate runtime.
This Skill does not create a new remote runtime and does not declare an MCP dependency. Tool availability belongs to the host. The workflow below governs what to do when host-native Python is available and what to report when it is not.
Use host-native Python when the requested workflow materially benefits from real execution, including:
Do not invoke Python merely to rewrite prose, brainstorm names, or perform a trivial fact lookup where execution adds no evidence.
When the python tool is available and the task requires executable verification:
For a local Plugin artifact mounted in the host sandbox, use Python to run the applicable evidence-producing stages rather than only describing them:
analyze_repo.py
-> candidate/architecture evidence
build_directory_pack.py
-> listing evidence
validate_plugin.py
-> package preflight evidence
package_plugin.py x2
-> deterministic archive evidence
fresh extraction + validate_plugin.py
-> installable-artifact evidence
Run only the stages relevant to the user's request. Repository-native tests remain separate evidence and should be run through the safest host execution facility available when the workflow requires them.
After execution, report enough evidence to distinguish a real run from a proposed command. Include the relevant subset of:
Never fabricate stdout, hashes, paths, test counts, or generated artifacts.
If the python tool is unavailable in the current host/session:
Do not invent a Plugin manifest field, agents/openai.yaml dependency, MCP server, or remote code runner solely to pretend that ChatGPT's Python sandbox is available.
This Skill is an execution policy for host-native tooling. It is not a general arbitrary-code-execution service for other users or remote systems. Keep Plugin Autopilot skills-only unless a separate product requirement genuinely needs an external authenticated action/data boundary.
还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。
无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。
还没有评论。来写第一条吧。
Use when an existing repository contains agents, prompts, workflows, playbooks, commands, or Skills and you need to identify which capabilities are worth converting into a ChatGPT/Codex Plugin.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use when converting an agentic repository into a ChatGPT/Codex Plugin or when building, repairing, validating, packaging, submitting, publishing, or auditing an existing Plugin.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use when a ChatGPT/Codex Plugin workflow needs to inspect, search, modify, or verify files in the host workspace using the safest native tools available.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use when a ChatGPT/Codex Plugin needs a production-ready visual identity and SVG logo system that clearly expresses the Plugin's job across light and dark surfaces.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use when a validated ChatGPT/Codex Plugin needs accurate Plugin Directory fields, discovery metadata, starter prompts, and reviewer-facing listing details grounded in the packaged product.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use when a set of candidate Skills or app capabilities is technically valid but still needs to become a clear, useful ChatGPT/Codex Plugin that people can understand, discover, and invoke for real work.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。