跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

openspec-bulk-archive-change

Archive multiple completed changes at once. Use when archiving several parallel changes.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

查看安装方法

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md7.5 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Archive multiple completed changes in a single operation.

This skill allows you to batch-archive changes, handling spec conflicts intelligently by checking the codebase to determine what's actually implemented.

Input: None required (prompts for selection)

Steps

  1. Get active changes

    Run openspec list --json to get all active changes.

    If no active changes exist, inform user and stop.

  2. Prompt for change selection

    Use AskUserQuestion tool with multi-select to let user choose changes:

    • Show each change with its schema
    • Include an option for "All changes"
    • Allow any number of selections (1+ works, 2+ is the typical use case)

    IMPORTANT: Do NOT auto-select. Always let the user choose.

  3. Batch validation - gather status for all selected changes

    For each selected change, collect:

    a. Artifact status - Run openspec status --change "<name>" --json

    • Parse schemaName and artifacts list
    • Note which artifacts are done vs other states

    b. Task completion - Read openspec/changes/<name>/tasks.md

    • Count - [ ] (incomplete) vs - [x] (complete)
    • If no tasks file exists, note as "No tasks"

    c. Delta specs - Check openspec/changes/<name>/specs/ directory

    • List which capability specs exist
    • For each, extract requirement names (lines matching ### Requirement: <name>)
  4. Detect spec conflicts

    Build a map of capability -> [changes that touch it]:

    auth -> [change-a, change-b]  <- CONFLICT (2+ changes)
    api  -> [change-c]            <- OK (only 1 change)
    

    A conflict exists when 2+ selected changes have delta specs for the same capability.

  5. Resolve conflicts agentically

    For each conflict, investigate the codebase:

    a. Read the delta specs from each conflicting change to understand what each claims to add/modify

    b. Search the codebase for implementation evidence:

    • Look for code implementing requirements from each delta spec
    • Check for related files, functions, or tests

    c. Determine resolution:

    • If only one change is actually implemented -> sync that one's specs
    • If both implemented -> apply in chronological order (older first, newer overwrites)
    • If neither implemented -> skip spec sync, warn user

    d. Record resolution for each conflict:

    • Which change's specs to apply
    • In what order (if both)
    • Rationale (what was found in codebase)
  6. Show consolidated status table

    Display a table summarizing all changes:

    | Change               | Artifacts | Tasks | Specs   | Conflicts | Status |
    |---------------------|-----------|-------|---------|-----------|--------|
    | schema-management   | Done      | 5/5   | 2 delta | None      | Ready  |
    | project-config      | Done      | 3/3   | 1 delta | None      | Ready  |
    | add-oauth           | Done      | 4/4   | 1 delta | auth (!)  | Ready* |
    | add-verify-skill    | 1 left    | 2/5   | None    | None      | Warn   |
    

    For conflicts, show the resolution:

    * Conflict resolution:
      - auth spec: Will apply add-oauth then add-jwt (both implemented, chronological order)
    

    For incomplete changes, show warnings:

    Warnings:
    - add-verify-skill: 1 incomplete artifact, 3 incomplete tasks
    
  7. Confirm batch operation

    Use AskUserQuestion tool with a single confirmation:

    • "Archive N changes?" with options based on status
    • Options might include:
      • "Archive all N changes"
      • "Archive only N ready changes (skip incomplete)"
      • "Cancel"

    If there are incomplete changes, make clear they'll be archived with warnings.

  8. Execute archive for each confirmed change

    Process changes in the determined order (respecting conflict resolution):

    a. Sync specs if delta specs exist:

    • Use the openspec-sync-specs approach (agent-driven intelligent merge)
    • For conflicts, apply in resolved order
    • Track if sync was done

    b. Perform the archive:

    mkdir -p openspec/changes/archive
    mv openspec/changes/<name> openspec/changes/archive/YYYY-MM-DD-<name>
    

    c. Track outcome for each change:

    • Success: archived successfully
    • Failed: error during archive (record error)
    • Skipped: user chose not to archive (if applicable)
  9. Display summary

    Show final results:

    ## Bulk Archive Complete
    
    Archived 3 changes:
    - schema-management-cli -> archive/2026-01-19-schema-management-cli/
    - project-config -> archive/2026-01-19-project-config/
    - add-oauth -> archive/2026-01-19-add-oauth/
    
    Skipped 1 change:
    - add-verify-skill (user chose not to archive incomplete)
    
    Spec sync summary:
    - 4 delta specs synced to main specs
    - 1 conflict resolved (auth: applied both in chronological order)
    

    If any failures:

    Failed 1 change:
    - some-change: Archive directory already exists
    

Conflict Resolution Examples

Example 1: Only one implemented

Conflict: specs/auth/spec.md touched by [add-oauth, add-jwt]

Checking add-oauth:
- Delta adds "OAuth Provider Integration" requirement
- Searching codebase... found src/auth/oauth.ts implementing OAuth flow

Checking add-jwt:
- Delta adds "JWT Token Handling" requirement
- Searching codebase... no JWT implementation found

Resolution: Only add-oauth is implemented. Will sync add-oauth specs only.

Example 2: Both implemented

Conflict: specs/api/spec.md touched by [add-rest-api, add-graphql]

Checking add-rest-api (created 2026-01-10):
- Delta adds "REST Endpoints" requirement
- Searching codebase... found src/api/rest.ts

Checking add-graphql (created 2026-01-15):
- Delta adds "GraphQL Schema" requirement
- Searching codebase... found src/api/graphql.ts

Resolution: Both implemented. Will apply add-rest-api specs first,
then add-graphql specs (chronological order, newer takes precedence).

Output On Success

## Bulk Archive Complete

Archived N changes:
- <change-1> -> archive/YYYY-MM-DD-<change-1>/
- <change-2> -> archive/YYYY-MM-DD-<change-2>/

Spec sync summary:
- N delta specs synced to main specs
- No conflicts (or: M conflicts resolved)

Output On Partial Success

## Bulk Archive Complete (partial)

Archived N changes:
- <change-1> -> archive/YYYY-MM-DD-<change-1>/

Skipped M changes:
- <change-2> (user chose not to archive incomplete)

Failed K changes:
- <change-3>: Archive directory already exists

Output When No Changes

## No Changes to Archive

No active changes found. Use `/opsx:new` to create a new change.

Guardrails

  • Allow any number of changes (1+ is fine, 2+ is the typical use case)
  • Always prompt for selection, never auto-select
  • Detect spec conflicts early and resolve by checking codebase
  • When both changes are implemented, apply specs in chronological order
  • Skip spec sync only when implementation is missing (warn user)
  • Show clear per-change status before confirming
  • Use single confirmation for entire batch
  • Track and report all outcomes (success/skip/fail)
  • Preserve .openspec.yaml when moving to archive
  • Archive directory target uses current date: YYYY-MM-DD-<name>
  • If archive target exists, fail that change but continue with others

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

lint

免费

Run lint checks for VK.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

impactaky/vk82026年4月10日 更新

Implement tasks from an OpenSpec change. Use when the user wants to start implementing, continue implementation, or work through tasks.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

impactaky/vk82026年4月10日 更新

Archive a completed change in the experimental workflow. Use when the user wants to finalize and archive a change after implementation is complete.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

impactaky/vk82026年4月10日 更新

Continue working on an OpenSpec change by creating the next artifact. Use when the user wants to progress their change, create the next artifact, or continue their workflow.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

impactaky/vk82026年4月10日 更新

Enter explore mode - a thinking partner for exploring ideas, investigating problems, and clarifying requirements. Use when the user wants to think through something before or during a change.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

impactaky/vk82026年4月10日 更新

Fast-forward through OpenSpec artifact creation. Use when the user wants to quickly create all artifacts needed for implementation without stepping through each one individually.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

impactaky/vk82026年4月10日 更新

查看 impactaky 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题