Delegate an approved finite batch of independent engineering or research responsibilities using the operator's existing worker channel. Use for broad repository discovery, multiple search directions, repeated checks and substantial dirty work; keep coupled single tasks with one worker and explicit solo work in the main session.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
查看安装方法安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。
Use worker-routing for the coordinator/worker contract and channel authority. This method expands already-authorized independent responsibilities; it grants no new provider, data, workspace, account or cost authority. One configured route may serve multiple sessions, but its shared state must actually support that arrangement. Workers remain peers and cannot recursively route or create a reviewer hierarchy.
State the finite outcome, criteria, candidate/input coverage, independent responsibility list, exact read/write roots and shared resources. Small repeated operations can form one complete script-based responsibility. Do not first investigate every candidate yourself. Keep an internally coupled implementation with one worker; split only where execution and acceptance are meaningfully independent. Batch size is an execution choice, not a reason to expand the goal or require the user to configure each worker manually.
Use the operator's current authorized channel. ACP follows acp-worker with explicit current permissions; native uses the live host tools and their existing boundaries. Use the actual finite-batch interface the installed integration exposes, not a fabricated slash command. For an authorized ACP batch, one authored order spec becomes the order files and manifest; nothing needs hand-assembling per item. Read batch execution and collection before launching a batch.
Each worker owns a complete local outcome: investigate, implement if authorized, check, repair ordinary defects and deliver evidence. A finished slot may receive the next item already in the approved list; do not wait for the slowest unrelated item before proceeding. Throttle starts when collection or acceptance backs up. A blocked item does not reclaim all other execution. Missing required items mean partial, even when most receipts completed.
If a worker needs a decision, supply the smallest useful increment and return execution. If only its report is deficient, consolidate existing findings rather than repeat research. Correct evidenced caller/permission/environment mistakes under existing authority. Preserve supported artifacts, original identity and stop/cleanup facts before rework or replacement.
Collect bounded summaries and expandable artifacts. Mechanical collection can check identity, duplicates, coverage, missing records and reference locatability; it cannot prove semantics or check freshness automatically. Compare runner-observed records separately against a task-confirmed candidate identity; metadata alone leaves freshness unknown. Settled results are readable while the rest of the batch still runs; each carries a bounded worker-reported excerpt and candidate next actions that stay hints, never auto-executed. Keep ready/partial/needs_input declarations, runtime status and coordinator acceptance separate. A result with unknown evidence stays unknown; an access failure is not no-support.
Read key conclusions with enough supporting context, coverage, counterevidence and unresolved questions. Expand or delegate only doubts that can change the decision. If cross-result reasoning warrants it, give one peer merger a bounded responsibility over collected packages and necessary evidence; no default review tier. It resolves identity/version distinctions, preserves source lineage and sends exact missing questions back to their original workers.
For parallel code edits, verify the combined final state and shared interfaces. Reuse current valid checks, and identify the narrow old evidence invalidated by a change. Tests do not cover unstated semantics. A high-risk permission/data/lifecycle boundary may need directed main review; neither worker confidence nor reviewer count substitutes for evidence.
Report covered/partial/unprocessed inputs, useful decisions and exact unresolved gaps. Public sharing uses only its existing allowlist; batch reports, orders, paths and detailed artifacts remain private local state. No mandatory review stamps or new task database are required.
还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。
无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问，或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。
还没有评论。来写第一条吧。
Run or continue an operator-authorized external ACP worker through cwr-acp when ACP is the operator's standing default or explicit task selection. Use the configured default or selected route with explicit per-turn permissions; mere native tool availability does not change the channel.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Choose the authorized worker channel and hand over complete engineering responsibilities, including in-scope self-check, repair and delivery. Use for substantial investigation, implementation, continuation and recovery — an ordinary substantial goal is enough, no special phrasing required; use swarm for approved independent batches. Respect the operator's standing ACP/native choice, explicit solo, and tiny or nearly finished work.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。