Design rigorous A/B tests with hypotheses, variants, metrics, and sample size calculations.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Establish durable brand and voice context for cross-skill consumption. Generates BRAND.md (audience, positioning, do/don't editorial rules, taboo phrases, competitor differentiation) and VOICE.md (existing persona JSON re-expressed as readable prose), both written to the project root. When present, all blog sub-skills auto-load these files before writing or reviewing. Pairs with blog-persona, which manages the structured persona JSON. Use when user says "blog brand", "create brand context", "brand voice doc", "BRAND.md", "VOICE.md", "establish editorial brand", "brand guidelines for blog".
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
实测评分 未实测
查看安装方法安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。
Generates two project-root files that every blog sub-skill auto-loads when present:
BRAND.md: who the audience is, what the brand stands for, what to never sayVOICE.md: how the brand sounds, structurally and lexicallyThese provide persistent editorial context that survives across sessions and propagates to every command.
Today, persona JSON (from blog-persona) is loaded by some skills and not others. Topic-cluster context lives inside cluster vaults. Competitor positioning lives nowhere. Each blog command re-derives "what is the brand" from whatever context it has.
BRAND.md and VOICE.md fix this: one canonical source, loaded by the blog orchestrator at the start of every command.
When neither file exists, behavior is unchanged. Backward compatible.
| Command | Purpose |
|---|---|
/blog brand init | Interactive interview, writes BRAND.md and VOICE.md to project root |
/blog brand show | Display current contents (or report missing) |
/blog brand update | Re-run the interview with current values as defaults |
Run the 5-step interactive interview. Ask each step, wait for response, then proceed. If blog-persona JSON already exists, pre-fill voice answers from it.
Ask:
Ask:
Ask:
Ask:
Ask:
Write to project root as:
# Brand Context
> This file is auto-loaded by all blog sub-skills. Last updated: YYYY-MM-DD.
## Audience
- **Primary**: [role + context]
- **Secondary**: [if any]
- **Expertise**: [level]
- **Active problems**:
- [problem 1]
- [problem 2]
- [problem 3]
- **Common misconceptions**:
- [misconception 1]
- [misconception 2]
## Positioning
- **Mission**: [one sentence]
- **Distinctive POV**: [contrarian or non-obvious belief]
- **What we are NOT**: [anti-positioning]
- **Competitors**:
- [Competitor A]: [our one-line differentiator]
- [Competitor B]: [our one-line differentiator]
- [Competitor C]: [our one-line differentiator]
## Editorial Rules
### Always do
- [rule 1]
- [rule 2]
- [rule 3]
### Never do
- [rule 1]
- [rule 2]
- [rule 3]
### Taboo phrases
- [phrase 1]
- [phrase 2]
### Required disclosures
- [disclosure rule]
## Topic Scope
- **In scope**: [pillars]
- **Partial scope**: [adjacent topics]
- **Out of scope**: [topics to refuse]
- **Recurring formats**: [if any]
Write to project root as:
# Voice Context
> This file is auto-loaded by all blog sub-skills. Last updated: YYYY-MM-DD.
## Pronoun stance
[first-person / second-person / third-person / mixed]
## Lexical rules
- **Contractions**: [full / partial / none]
- **Sentence ceiling**: [N words max]
- **Paragraph ceiling**: [N words max, default 150]
- **Summary label**: [Key Takeaways / TL;DR / etc.]
## Headline patterns
- **Favor**: [list]
- **Avoid**: [list]
## Voice fingerprint (from blog-persona)
- Funny vs serious: [0.0 to 1.0]
- Formal vs casual: [0.0 to 1.0]
- Respectful vs irreverent: [0.0 to 1.0]
- Enthusiastic vs matter-of-fact: [0.0 to 1.0]
## Readability target
- Audience tier: [consumer / professional / technical]
- Flesch Grade: [range]
- Flesch Ease: [range]
## Reference samples
- [URL 1] (extracted patterns: [summary])
- [URL 2] (extracted patterns: [summary])
BRAND.md and VOICE.md at project root./blog brand init.Same as Init, but pre-fills every answer with the current value. The user can press enter to accept or type a new value. After collecting all answers, overwrite both files with the new contents and update the Last updated: line.
When /blog write, /blog rewrite, /blog brief, /blog outline, /blog calendar, or /blog strategy runs, the orchestrator (skills/blog/SKILL.md) checks for BRAND.md and VOICE.md at the project root. If present, the contents are injected into the system prompt for downstream agents (blog-researcher, blog-writer, blog-seo, blog-reviewer).
If absent, behavior is unchanged. The orchestrator does not prompt the user to create them; they are opt-in context.
| Concern | blog-persona | blog-brand |
|---|---|---|
| Structured persona JSON for programmatic use | Yes | No |
| Readable brand context for cross-skill prompts | No | Yes |
| Audience and positioning | No | Yes |
| Taboo phrases and editorial don'ts | Partial (don't list) | Full (taboo + disclosures + scope) |
| Competitor differentiation | No | Yes |
| Topic boundaries | No | Yes |
| Voice fingerprint (tone sliders) | Yes (canonical) | Mirror (read-only) |
blog-brand does not replace blog-persona; it consumes it. The persona JSON remains the source of truth for tone dimensions, sentence-length distribution, and contraction frequency. VOICE.md mirrors the readable parts so prompts are self-contained.
If no persona exists when /blog brand init runs, the voice questions still produce a VOICE.md. Users who want programmatic enforcement can run /blog persona create after.
还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。
无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。
还没有评论。来写第一条吧。
Design rigorous A/B tests with hypotheses, variants, metrics, and sample size calculations.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment, or build a growth experimentation program. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "should I test this," "which version is better," "test two versions," "statistical significance," "how long should I run this test," "growth experiments," "experiment velocity," "experiment backlog," "ICE score," "experimentation program," or "experiment playbook." Use this whenever someone is comparing two approaches and wants to measure which performs better, or when they want to build a systematic experimentation practice. For tracking implementation, see analytics. For page-level conversion optimization, see cro.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Format CVs for academic positions with publications, grants, and teaching
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Conduct a comprehensive accessibility audit against WCAG guidelines with severity ratings and remediation steps.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Create accessibility testing plans covering assistive technologies and WCAG criteria.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
When the user wants to generate, iterate, or scale ad creative — headlines, descriptions, primary text, or full ad variations — for any paid advertising platform. Also use when the user mentions 'ad copy variations,' 'ad creative,' 'generate headlines,' 'RSA headlines,' 'bulk ad copy,' 'ad iterations,' 'creative testing,' 'ad performance optimization,' 'write me some ads,' 'Facebook ad copy,' 'Google ad headlines,' 'LinkedIn ad text,' or 'I need more ad variations.' Use this whenever someone needs to produce ad copy at scale or iterate on existing ads. For campaign strategy and targeting, see ads. For landing page copy, see copywriting.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。