跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

abridge-local-dev-loop

Build a local test setup for customer-owned Abridge integration code using synthetic data and mocked external calls. Reproduce workflow states and failures, track the interface revision behind test data, and document gaps between simulation and live systems.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

Build a local synthetic rehearsal for customer-owned Abridge workflow adapters and failure states. Use when developing integration code without access to patient data or a documented public Abridge sandbox. Trigger with "create an Abridge dev loop".

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Testing integration code without patient data
  • Reproducing timeouts and duplicate deliveries locally
  • Checking draft review and handoff states
  • Updating test data after private interface changes

包含的文件(2)

  • SKILL.md4.6 KB
  • references/official-docs.md1.8 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Abridge Synthetic Workflow Rehearsal

Overview

Model the approved interface control document locally with synthetic fixtures, deterministic state transitions, and zero vendor calls. Keep the harness useful even when tenant-specific schemas change by pinning each fixture to its authority revision.

Prerequisites

  • The authorized Abridge environment, clinical owner, and health-system policy set
  • Current tenant-specific implementation evidence for every private interface in scope
  • Synthetic data or the organization's formally approved test-record procedure

Tool Discipline

Use Read, Glob, and Grep to inspect repository configuration, adapters, tests, policies, and existing evidence. Use WebFetch only for current official Abridge, HHS, or named EHR documentation. Use Write or Edit only after confirming scope, environment, owners, patient-data boundary, and approval state. These tools do not confer access to Abridge, an EHR, or a clinical record; return exact operator steps or an approval-gated handoff for live actions.

Current Contract

  • Abridge public support materials describe the human workflow but do not promise a universal public developer sandbox.
  • A local EHR simulator or mock adapter tests customer code only; it does not reproduce Abridge, Epic, or clinical behavior.
  • Synthetic dialogue must avoid copied patient phrases and realistic identifiers.

Authentication

Use only the health system's provisioned Abridge application access, SSO, administrative role, or tenant-specific partner authentication documented for the approved environment. Do not infer public API credentials, reuse production secrets in tests, or expose tokens and session material. Verify identity owner, least privilege, environment binding, storage, rotation, and revocation before any authenticated action.

Instructions

  1. Freeze the customer-owned boundary, private contract revision, permitted fields, and expected state transitions.
  2. Use Read, Glob, and Grep to inspect adapters and tests, then identify every external call that must be mocked.
  3. Create obviously synthetic fixtures for consent state, encounter selection, draft metadata, review state, and handoff result.
  4. Add deterministic failures for timeout, duplicate delivery, stale revision, wrong tenant, unreviewed draft, and redaction rejection.
  5. Use Write or Edit to implement the harness and record its non-equivalence to live systems.
  6. Use WebFetch only to keep the modeled user journey aligned with official Abridge guidance.

Approval Boundaries

Do not proxy a live tenant, download production payloads, or label a local mock as vendor certification.

Output

Return modeled boundary, fixture classes, authority revision, state coverage, failure coverage, live-call count, and known simulation gaps. Separate verified facts, tenant-specific evidence, assumptions, and actions still awaiting approval.

Error Handling

ConditionResponse
Fixture provenance is unknownDelete and recreate it from synthetic requirements.
Test performs a network callFail closed and replace it with a mock.
Private schema changedVersion the new fixture and retain migration coverage.

Example

The example is a redacted operational receipt, not patient data or proof of vendor certification.

boundary=review-state-adapter; fixtures=7-synthetic; failures=6; network-calls=0; authority=ICD-r12; certification-claim=none

Resources

Read the source map before changing a workflow. Recheck tenant-specific implementation evidence for every interface or capability that public documentation does not define.

Next Steps

Revalidate the evidence date and tenant-specific authority before repeating this workflow in another environment, cohort, care setting, or integration mode.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Add a synthetic-data CI gate for customer-owned Abridge integration code. Test consent handling, note-review handoffs, redaction, and rollback behavior with mocked vendor boundaries, without connecting CI to a live Abridge or EHR tenant.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Adding regression checks to an Abridge integration repository
  • Testing consent and note-release handling
  • Checking logs for sensitive data exposure
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28682026年10月25日 更新

Triage Abridge recording, note review, Epic handoff, and access problems using observed symptoms and approved guidance. Identify the affected workflow stage, organize a minimal timeline, and prepare a redacted escalation record for the responsible team.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Separate recording problems from upload failures
  • Investigate note creation delays and editor issues
  • Identify the responsible team for Epic handoff failures
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28682026年10月25日 更新

Map and review an Abridge clinical documentation workflow from consent and recording through draft review, evidence checks, edits, and final disposition. Keep clinician approval explicit, identify failure exits, and separate verified facts from tenant-specific details and pending approvals.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Map a clinical note workflow for a care setting
  • Check where consent and patient identity are verified
  • Review draft notes against linked evidence before sign-off
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28682026年10月25日 更新

Audit how clinician-reviewed Abridge note sections map into Epic templates and downstream workflows. Use approved test records to document destinations, exceptions, evidence, rollback steps, and a go or no-go decision for a specific environment.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Checking Abridge note section mappings to Epic templates
  • Auditing a department’s approved documentation handoff
  • Preparing test evidence and a go or no-go decision
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28682026年10月25日 更新

Review Abridge adoption and workflow value using local usage records, clinician feedback, and verified contract costs. Build an evidence based decision table covering adoption, quality, support burden, and options to expand, hold, or improve the rollout.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Reviewing adoption after an Abridge rollout
  • Preparing evidence for a renewal decision
  • Comparing workflow outcomes across care settings
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28682026年10月25日 更新

Prepare a bounded support bundle for an Abridge issue using allowlisted operational details such as versions, coarse timestamps, and correlation references. Exclude recordings, transcripts, patient identifiers, credentials, and unrestricted logs, then document redactions and review details.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Preparing reviewed evidence for an Abridge support case
  • Documenting redactions and excluded data
  • Collecting approved operational details for an incident
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28682026年10月25日 更新

查看 jeremylongshore 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题