跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

adobe-debug-bundle

Prepare a minimal Adobe diagnostic archive for engineering or support escalation. It uses an explicit collection allowlist, synthetic reproduction evidence, redaction checks, hashes, and custody details so reviewers can inspect what was collected and what remains unresolved.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

Assemble a minimal, reproducible Adobe diagnostic bundle with default-deny collection and verifiable redaction. Use for engineering or Adobe support escalation. Use when the task requires adobe redacted diagnostic bundle. Trigger with "Adobe debug bundle", "collect Adobe diagnostics", or "prepare Adobe support case".

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Preparing a redacted Adobe support bundle
  • Reproducing an issue with synthetic test data
  • Checking a diagnostic archive for secrets or sensitive content

包含的文件(2)

  • SKILL.md4.1 KB
  • references/official-docs.md3.1 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Adobe Redacted Diagnostic Bundle

Overview

Assemble a minimal, reproducible Adobe diagnostic bundle with default-deny collection and verifiable redaction. This workflow produces a reviewable artifact and evidence before any live side effect.

Prerequisites

  • Current first-party Adobe documentation for every selected service, API version, auth flow, limit, and lifecycle.
  • Named product, identity, security, data, budget, release, and operations owners appropriate to the scope.
  • Synthetic or approved non-production fixtures with secret and content canaries.

Current Contract

Useful evidence is version, configuration-key presence, service/operation, environment aliases, timestamps, status/error class, request/job/activation identifiers, retry history, and a synthetic reproduction. Tokens, secrets, signed URLs, prompts, images, documents, event bodies, and customer identifiers are excluded by default. Recheck the dated evidence map before relying on mutable product behavior.

Authentication

Use one-way fingerprints only when correlation is necessary. Never call the IMS token endpoint merely to populate a support archive.

Instructions

  1. Define incident window, service, operation, data classification, recipients, retention, and custodian.
  2. Create an allowlist manifest before collection and enumerate explicitly forbidden fields and file classes.
  3. Collect dependency locks, deployment revision, sanitized configuration keys, status/error evidence, and correlation IDs.
  4. Reproduce with a synthetic fixture or read-only check and record expected versus observed behavior.
  5. Run secret, URL, PII, document/image, prompt, and identifier canaries across every output.
  6. Hash the bundle, record redactions and gaps, transfer through an approved channel, and schedule deletion.

Tool Discipline

Use Read, Glob, and Grep to inspect current documentation, configuration, code, fixtures, and evidence. Use Write and Edit only for approved repository artifacts. Skill invocation alone does not authorize network access, credentials, Adobe content, consent, uploads, generation, spend, deployment, registration changes, replay, cancellation, or deletion.

Approval Boundaries

Incident and data owners approve collection; security approves external disclosure. Any broader trace, content sample, or retention extension requires a fresh explicit approval.

Error Handling

  • Abort if an Authorization header, token, client secret, refresh token, signed URL, or customer content survives.
  • Do not execute speculative network probes against production.
  • Quarantine a bundle whose audience or deletion owner is unknown.

Output

Return a minimal archive, allowlist manifest, hashes, redaction scan, reproduction, custody log, expiry, and deletion owner. Mark assumptions, observed environment behavior, owners, evidence dates, and unresolved gaps explicitly.

Examples

  • Diagnose a synthetic 429 without credential or content values.
  • Reject a bundle containing a pre-signed asset URL.

Validation

Exercise and record expected and observed results for:

  • secret canary
  • signed URL
  • content canary
  • request ID
  • external transfer
  • expiry deletion

Resources

  • Current first-party evidence map — recheck dated Adobe sources before execution.
  • Treat observed tenant or product behavior as environment-specific evidence, never a universal Adobe guarantee.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Add a synthetic-data CI gate for customer-owned Abridge integration code. Test consent handling, note-review handoffs, redaction, and rollback behavior with mocked vendor boundaries, without connecting CI to a live Abridge or EHR tenant.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Adding regression checks to an Abridge integration repository
  • Testing consent and note-release handling
  • Checking logs for sensitive data exposure
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28672026年10月23日 更新

Triage Abridge recording, note review, Epic handoff, and access problems using observed symptoms and approved guidance. Identify the affected workflow stage, organize a minimal timeline, and prepare a redacted escalation record for the responsible team.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Separate recording problems from upload failures
  • Investigate note creation delays and editor issues
  • Identify the responsible team for Epic handoff failures
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28672026年10月23日 更新

Map and review an Abridge clinical documentation workflow from consent and recording through draft review, evidence checks, edits, and final disposition. Keep clinician approval explicit, identify failure exits, and separate verified facts from tenant-specific details and pending approvals.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Map a clinical note workflow for a care setting
  • Check where consent and patient identity are verified
  • Review draft notes against linked evidence before sign-off
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28672026年10月23日 更新

Audit how clinician-reviewed Abridge note sections map into Epic templates and downstream workflows. Use approved test records to document destinations, exceptions, evidence, rollback steps, and a go or no-go decision for a specific environment.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Checking Abridge note section mappings to Epic templates
  • Auditing a department’s approved documentation handoff
  • Preparing test evidence and a go or no-go decision
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28672026年10月23日 更新

Review Abridge adoption and workflow value using local usage records, clinician feedback, and verified contract costs. Build an evidence based decision table covering adoption, quality, support burden, and options to expand, hold, or improve the rollout.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Reviewing adoption after an Abridge rollout
  • Preparing evidence for a renewal decision
  • Comparing workflow outcomes across care settings
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28672026年10月23日 更新

Prepare a bounded support bundle for an Abridge issue using allowlisted operational details such as versions, coarse timestamps, and correlation references. Exclude recordings, transcripts, patient identifiers, credentials, and unrestricted logs, then document redactions and review details.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Preparing reviewed evidence for an Abridge support case
  • Documenting redactions and excluded data
  • Collecting approved operational details for an incident
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28672026年10月23日 更新

查看 jeremylongshore 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题