跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

agent-safety-preflight

Check a local repository before AI-assisted edits and issue a Green, Yellow, or Red risk receipt. It highlights destructive commands, credential-writing automation, risky agent permissions, and Git state, then recommends whether to proceed, checkpoint, or stop for review.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

Generate a local repository risk receipt before Claude Code or other AI-agent edits. Use when the user asks to prepare a repository for agent changes, check for risky hooks or credential-writing automation, or run the /agent-preflight command. Trigger with "run agent preflight", "check this repo before agent edits", or "/agent-preflight".

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Check a repository before agent edits
  • Review hooks and automation for destructive actions
  • Find credential-writing scripts or workflows
  • Decide whether to proceed, checkpoint, or stop

包含的文件(2)

  • SKILL.md4.7 KB
  • references/decision-rules.md1.1 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Agent Safety Preflight

Overview

Agent Safety Preflight helps Claude inspect a local repository before making AI-agent-assisted edits. It produces a compact Green, Yellow, or Red risk receipt from local files only, with special attention to destructive shell patterns, credential-writing automation, agent authority surfaces, uncommitted changes, and unavailable git state.

The skill pairs with the /agent-preflight command in this plugin. Prefer the bundled lightweight scanner when it is available from a trusted Claude install root, then explain the decision and next safe action before editing.

Prerequisites

  • A local repository or workspace path to inspect.
  • Python 3 available for the bundled agent_preflight_lite.py scanner.
  • Git available when the workspace is a git repository.
  • Permission to read the target workspace locally.

Do not send source, secrets, tokens, private repository contents, payment credentials, or environment variables to external services while using this skill.

Instructions

  1. Confirm the target repository path. Use the current workspace unless the user supplied a path.
  2. Use Read only for local documentation or configuration files that explain the workspace; do not copy private source into the response.
  3. Run /agent-preflight when the command is installed, or invoke the bundled scanner from a trusted Claude install root.
  4. If the scanner is unavailable, apply the same manual decision rules: destructive commands, credential-writing automation, risky agent authority, git state, and high-risk shell or network install chains.
  5. Classify the workspace as Green, Yellow, or Red.
  6. Report the decision, evidence, and next safe action before making edits.
  7. For Yellow results, ask for a checkpoint or narrower scope before broad edits.
  8. For Red results, stop and request human review before changing files.

Output

Return a short receipt in Markdown that is safe to paste into the local work log or pull request notes:

## Agent Safety Preflight Receipt

- Decision: Green | Yellow | Red
- Repository: <path>
- Git state: clean | dirty | unavailable
- Risk buckets: <bullets>
- Evidence: <file/path markers>
- Next safe action: proceed | checkpoint | stop

Error Handling

  • If the scanner cannot be found from a trusted install root, say that the automated scanner did not run and use the manual rules.
  • If git status is unavailable, classify the workspace as Yellow rather than Green.
  • If a file cannot be decoded, scan the readable prefix with tolerant UTF-8 decoding and include a note if relevant evidence may be incomplete.
  • If a destructive or credential-writing marker appears in an agent-controlled path, classify the workspace as Red and stop.
  • If the workspace is too large for a full pass, inspect high-signal paths first: .claude/, .cursor/, .github/, shell scripts, JSON/YAML/TOML config, package manifests, and environment files.

Examples

Example 1: Clean repo before routine edits

User request: "Run a preflight before you update this README."

The skill runs the scanner, sees a clean git state and no high-risk automation markers, then returns Green with the repository path and evidence summary.

Example 2: Agent hooks present

User request: "Check this repo before the agent refactor."

The skill detects agent hook configuration or broad tool permissions, returns Yellow, and recommends a checkpoint or narrower edit scope before continuing.

Example 3: Destructive automation found

User request: "Start editing this generated-project repo."

The skill finds a destructive recursive delete pattern in an automation file, returns Red, and stops until a human reviews the workflow.

Resources

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Add a synthetic-data CI gate for customer-owned Abridge integration code. Test consent handling, note-review handoffs, redaction, and rollback behavior with mocked vendor boundaries, without connecting CI to a live Abridge or EHR tenant.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Adding regression checks to an Abridge integration repository
  • Testing consent and note-release handling
  • Checking logs for sensitive data exposure
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28672026年10月23日 更新

Triage Abridge recording, note review, Epic handoff, and access problems using observed symptoms and approved guidance. Identify the affected workflow stage, organize a minimal timeline, and prepare a redacted escalation record for the responsible team.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Separate recording problems from upload failures
  • Investigate note creation delays and editor issues
  • Identify the responsible team for Epic handoff failures
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28672026年10月23日 更新

Map and review an Abridge clinical documentation workflow from consent and recording through draft review, evidence checks, edits, and final disposition. Keep clinician approval explicit, identify failure exits, and separate verified facts from tenant-specific details and pending approvals.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Map a clinical note workflow for a care setting
  • Check where consent and patient identity are verified
  • Review draft notes against linked evidence before sign-off
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28672026年10月23日 更新

Audit how clinician-reviewed Abridge note sections map into Epic templates and downstream workflows. Use approved test records to document destinations, exceptions, evidence, rollback steps, and a go or no-go decision for a specific environment.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Checking Abridge note section mappings to Epic templates
  • Auditing a department’s approved documentation handoff
  • Preparing test evidence and a go or no-go decision
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28672026年10月23日 更新

Review Abridge adoption and workflow value using local usage records, clinician feedback, and verified contract costs. Build an evidence based decision table covering adoption, quality, support burden, and options to expand, hold, or improve the rollout.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Reviewing adoption after an Abridge rollout
  • Preparing evidence for a renewal decision
  • Comparing workflow outcomes across care settings
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28672026年10月23日 更新

Prepare a bounded support bundle for an Abridge issue using allowlisted operational details such as versions, coarse timestamps, and correlation references. Exclude recordings, transcripts, patient identifiers, credentials, and unrestricted logs, then document redactions and review details.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Preparing reviewed evidence for an Abridge support case
  • Documenting redactions and excluded data
  • Collecting approved operational details for an incident
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28672026年10月23日 更新

查看 jeremylongshore 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题