跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

alchemy-security-basics

Review security in Alchemy applications across credentials, browser access, wallet signing authority, and webhook verification. Map trust boundaries, define data checks, and collect evidence from secret scans and failure tests.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

Analyze and secure Alchemy credentials, browser access, wallet authority, webhook verification, and untrusted chain data. Use when securing an Alchemy-backed application. Trigger with "secure Alchemy", "Alchemy API key exposure", or "verify an Alchemy webhook".

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Reviewing Alchemy credentials for exposure
  • Checking browser access restrictions
  • Validating Notify webhook signatures
  • Separating read access from wallet signing authority

包含的文件(2)

  • SKILL.md4.9 KB
  • references/official-docs.md2.9 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Alchemy Credential and Trust-Boundary Security

Overview

Analyze and secure Alchemy credentials, browser access, wallet authority, webhook verification, and untrusted chain data. This workflow produces a reviewable artifact and negative-path evidence before any live side effect.

Prerequisites

  • Current first-party Alchemy documentation for the selected product, chain, feature, client, authentication method, limit, and lifecycle.
  • Named product, application, security, data/privacy, budget, release, and operations owners appropriate to the requested scope.
  • Synthetic or approved non-production fixtures, a credential canary, explicit success criteria, and a tested rollback boundary.

Current Contract

An Alchemy application key identifies and limits provider access but is not a wallet private key. Frontend use is not categorically forbidden: current guidance supports explicit allowlists and recommends short-lived JWTs where appropriate. Admin keys, Notify tokens, webhook signing keys, and transaction signing authority remain server-side and separately controlled.

Authentication

Create a credential matrix covering application keys, access keys, Admin access, Notify management, webhook verification, and wallet signers. Assign owner, storage, runtime, scopes/allowlists, rotation, revocation, monitoring, and incident procedure to each.

Instructions

  1. Map browser, edge, server, CI, webhook, admin, and wallet trust boundaries and the data crossing each boundary.
  2. Choose server header auth for confidential workloads; if browser access is justified, apply exact allowlists or short-lived JWTs and test bypass conditions.
  3. Validate chain IDs, addresses, block selectors, contract ABIs, method allowlists, response sizes, and remote NFT metadata before use.
  4. Keep read clients separate from signers; require explicit transaction simulation, user intent, policy checks, and approval in a distinct workflow.
  5. Verify Notify payloads against the raw body using HMAC-SHA256 and the per-webhook signing key before parsing or side effects.
  6. Run source, artifact, log, browser-bundle, and configuration secret scans; exercise rotation and incident response before production.

Tool Discipline

Use Read, Glob, and Grep to inspect current documentation, configuration, code, fixtures, and evidence. Use Write and Edit only for approved repository artifacts. Skill invocation alone does not authorize network access, credentials, wallet addresses, customer data, plan changes, spend, key creation or rotation, webhook changes, deployment, replay, transaction construction, signing, broadcast, or deletion.

Approval Boundaries

Security approves browser keys, JWT issuers, secret stores, signing boundaries, and incident response. Wallet transactions, new allowlists, credential rotation, or revocation require the named owner.

Error Handling

  • Do not compare webhook signatures with ordinary string equality or after reserializing JSON.
  • Do not let an application API key or read client imply transaction-signing permission.
  • If credential material is exposed, fail closed, rotate or revoke it, inspect downstream use, and preserve a redacted receipt.

Output

Return the threat model, credential matrix, browser/server decision, input and response controls, signer separation, webhook verification contract, scan evidence, rotation exercise, and open risks. Mark assumptions, observations, source dates, environment-specific behavior, owners, and unresolved gaps explicitly.

Examples

  • Approve a restricted browser read only after proving the configured origin allowlist rejects an unlisted origin and the bundle contains no broader credential.
  • Reject a webhook whose signature is valid only after JSON reserialization because verification must cover the exact raw body.

Validation

Exercise and record expected and observed results for:

  • unlisted browser origin
  • expired short-lived JWT
  • wrong chain
  • oversized response
  • bad webhook signature
  • secret canary in build artifact

Resources

  • Current first-party evidence map — recheck dated Alchemy sources before execution.
  • Treat observed account, application, network, indexer, chain, or provider behavior as environment-specific evidence, never a universal guarantee.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Add a synthetic-data CI gate for customer-owned Abridge integration code. Test consent handling, note-review handoffs, redaction, and rollback behavior with mocked vendor boundaries, without connecting CI to a live Abridge or EHR tenant.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Adding regression checks to an Abridge integration repository
  • Testing consent and note-release handling
  • Checking logs for sensitive data exposure
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28682026年10月25日 更新

Triage Abridge recording, note review, Epic handoff, and access problems using observed symptoms and approved guidance. Identify the affected workflow stage, organize a minimal timeline, and prepare a redacted escalation record for the responsible team.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Separate recording problems from upload failures
  • Investigate note creation delays and editor issues
  • Identify the responsible team for Epic handoff failures
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28682026年10月25日 更新

Map and review an Abridge clinical documentation workflow from consent and recording through draft review, evidence checks, edits, and final disposition. Keep clinician approval explicit, identify failure exits, and separate verified facts from tenant-specific details and pending approvals.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Map a clinical note workflow for a care setting
  • Check where consent and patient identity are verified
  • Review draft notes against linked evidence before sign-off
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28682026年10月25日 更新

Audit how clinician-reviewed Abridge note sections map into Epic templates and downstream workflows. Use approved test records to document destinations, exceptions, evidence, rollback steps, and a go or no-go decision for a specific environment.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Checking Abridge note section mappings to Epic templates
  • Auditing a department’s approved documentation handoff
  • Preparing test evidence and a go or no-go decision
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28682026年10月25日 更新

Review Abridge adoption and workflow value using local usage records, clinician feedback, and verified contract costs. Build an evidence based decision table covering adoption, quality, support burden, and options to expand, hold, or improve the rollout.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Reviewing adoption after an Abridge rollout
  • Preparing evidence for a renewal decision
  • Comparing workflow outcomes across care settings
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28682026年10月25日 更新

Prepare a bounded support bundle for an Abridge issue using allowlisted operational details such as versions, coarse timestamps, and correlation references. Exclude recordings, transcripts, patient identifiers, credentials, and unrestricted logs, then document redactions and review details.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Preparing reviewed evidence for an Abridge support case
  • Documenting redactions and excluded data
  • Collecting approved operational details for an incident
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28682026年10月25日 更新

查看 jeremylongshore 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题