跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

algolia-data-handling

Review records and user events sent to Algolia. Maps data flows, identifies unnecessary fields, and develops correction and deletion procedures with verification evidence, giving privacy owners a technical basis for reviewing data handling.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

Design and audit the data lifecycle for records and user events sent to Algolia. Use when minimizing indexed fields, handling deletion requests, or documenting retention and privacy boundaries. Trigger with "Algolia privacy", "delete Algolia user data", or "index data review".

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Reduce unnecessary fields in search records
  • Plan record and event deletion for user requests
  • Check how source data corrections reach Algolia
  • Document data flows and retention responsibilities

包含的文件(2)

  • SKILL.md4.0 KB
  • references/official-docs.md1.3 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Algolia Data Handling Review

Overview

This skill maps which data leaves the source system, how it becomes searchable records or events, and how correction and deletion propagate. It does not claim legal compliance; it produces technical evidence for the responsible privacy owner.

Prerequisites

  • A named repository, environment, and Algolia application or index in scope
  • The local lockfile and installed client types as implementation authority
  • A safe read-only query or explicitly disposable test target
  • Current first-party documentation for any provider behavior that affects the change

Tool Discipline

Use Read, Glob, and Grep to inspect local code, configuration names, tests, and dependency versions. Use WebFetch only for current official Algolia documentation. Use Write or Edit only after identifying the target files, constraints, and verification plan.

Current Contract

  • Index only fields required for retrieval, ranking, filtering, display, or approved analytics.
  • Treat attributesToRetrieve as response shaping, not as a substitute for excluding sensitive data from records.
  • Keep source-system identity mappings so corrections and deletions are reproducible.
  • Handle record deletion and Insights user-token deletion as separate surfaces with separate evidence.

Authentication

Use a restricted backend write key for record changes and the documented authorization for user-data deletion. Never include raw secrets or direct personal identifiers in logs or example events.

Instructions

  1. Inventory record fields, derived attributes, event fields, user tokens, environments, and downstream exports.
  2. Classify each field by purpose, sensitivity, source authority, and deletion requirement.
  3. Remove unnecessary fields before indexing and test that UI and ranking behavior still work.
  4. Implement idempotent correction and deletion paths with request IDs and target indices.
  5. Verify absence using bounded lookups and preserve evidence without retaining the deleted value.
  6. Document retention ownership, incident escalation, and gaps for privacy or legal review.

Approval Boundaries

Do not make legal conclusions, bulk-delete records, change retention policy, or expose protected values while verifying a request.

Output

Return the data-flow map, field inventory, minimization changes, deletion/correction procedure, verification evidence, unresolved provider retention questions, and named policy owner.

Error Handling

ConditionResponse
Identity mapping missingStop and reconcile the source identity before deletion.
Deletion task incompleteRetain the task ID and verify state before closing.
Event token contains PIIStop sending it and escalate remediation.
Policy answer unavailableRecord the question for the privacy owner or provider.

Examples

Use this compact input and expected handoff to calibrate scope and evidence quality.

Input:

request=privacy-123; surfaces=records,events; indices=customer_search

Expected handoff:

records=removed-and-verified; events=requested; legal-determination=not-made

Resources

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Add a synthetic-data CI gate for customer-owned Abridge integration code. Test consent handling, note-review handoffs, redaction, and rollback behavior with mocked vendor boundaries, without connecting CI to a live Abridge or EHR tenant.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Adding regression checks to an Abridge integration repository
  • Testing consent and note-release handling
  • Checking logs for sensitive data exposure
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28692026年10月25日 更新

Triage Abridge recording, note review, Epic handoff, and access problems using observed symptoms and approved guidance. Identify the affected workflow stage, organize a minimal timeline, and prepare a redacted escalation record for the responsible team.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Separate recording problems from upload failures
  • Investigate note creation delays and editor issues
  • Identify the responsible team for Epic handoff failures
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28692026年10月25日 更新

Map and review an Abridge clinical documentation workflow from consent and recording through draft review, evidence checks, edits, and final disposition. Keep clinician approval explicit, identify failure exits, and separate verified facts from tenant-specific details and pending approvals.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Map a clinical note workflow for a care setting
  • Check where consent and patient identity are verified
  • Review draft notes against linked evidence before sign-off
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28692026年10月25日 更新

Audit how clinician-reviewed Abridge note sections map into Epic templates and downstream workflows. Use approved test records to document destinations, exceptions, evidence, rollback steps, and a go or no-go decision for a specific environment.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Checking Abridge note section mappings to Epic templates
  • Auditing a department’s approved documentation handoff
  • Preparing test evidence and a go or no-go decision
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28692026年10月25日 更新

Review Abridge adoption and workflow value using local usage records, clinician feedback, and verified contract costs. Build an evidence based decision table covering adoption, quality, support burden, and options to expand, hold, or improve the rollout.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Reviewing adoption after an Abridge rollout
  • Preparing evidence for a renewal decision
  • Comparing workflow outcomes across care settings
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28692026年10月25日 更新

Prepare a bounded support bundle for an Abridge issue using allowlisted operational details such as versions, coarse timestamps, and correlation references. Exclude recordings, transcripts, patient identifiers, credentials, and unrestricted logs, then document redactions and review details.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Preparing reviewed evidence for an Abridge support case
  • Documenting redactions and excluded data
  • Collecting approved operational details for an incident
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28692026年10月25日 更新

查看 jeremylongshore 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题