跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

algolia-debug-bundle

Collect evidence for reproducible Algolia search or indexing failures, including client versions, reproduction steps, and redacted request details. Package the findings with a file manifest and secret scan results for review before a support handoff.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

Collect a bounded, secret-safe Algolia diagnostic bundle for an incident or support escalation. Use when a reproducible search or indexing failure needs portable evidence. Trigger with "Algolia debug bundle", "collect Algolia diagnostics", or "Algolia support evidence".

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Preparing evidence for an Algolia support request
  • Documenting a reproducible search or indexing failure
  • Reviewing diagnostic files for sensitive information

包含的文件(2)

  • SKILL.md3.9 KB
  • references/official-docs.md1.3 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Algolia Redacted Debug Bundle

Overview

This skill assembles code, configuration shape, client versions, redacted request evidence, task IDs, and reproduction steps without copying API keys, full records, or unrestricted account data.

Prerequisites

  • A named repository, environment, and Algolia application or index in scope
  • The local lockfile and installed client types as implementation authority
  • A safe read-only query or explicitly disposable test target
  • Current first-party documentation for any provider behavior that affects the change

Tool Discipline

Use Read, Glob, and Grep to inspect local code, configuration names, tests, and dependency versions. Use WebFetch only for current official Algolia documentation. Use Write or Edit only after identifying the target files, constraints, and verification plan.

Current Contract

  • Prefer local configuration names and hashes over live secret or key inspection.
  • Collect the smallest failing request and response; redact credentials, personal data, and unrelated record fields.
  • Include timestamps, regions or hosts, request IDs, task IDs, and client versions when available.
  • Create a manifest before sharing so reviewers can see every included file and redaction rule.

Authentication

Do not fetch, print, validate, or transmit secret values. If a support workflow needs account evidence, use a separately approved read-only credential and preserve only redacted results.

Instructions

  1. Define the incident, recipient, allowed data classes, time window, and maximum bundle size.
  2. Inspect local dependencies, wrapper code, environment variable names, index configuration, and recent relevant logs.
  3. Reproduce one safe read or disposable-index operation and capture redacted request metadata.
  4. Scan every artifact for keys, tokens, emails, user tokens, record payloads, and unrelated secrets.
  5. Build a plain-text manifest with collection source, hash, redaction action, and omission reason.
  6. Review the manifest and bundle contents before any external transfer.

Approval Boundaries

Do not use an Admin key for diagnosis, archive an entire environment, collect production records wholesale, or send the bundle automatically.

Output

Return the reproduction, dependency versions, redacted evidence, artifact manifest, secret-scan result, omitted evidence, and a human-approved handoff path.

Error Handling

ConditionResponse
Potential secret foundRemove the artifact or redact it, then rescan.
Reproduction mutates productionStop and move to a disposable target.
Bundle exceeds limitNarrow the time window and fields.
Required evidence is sensitiveDescribe the gap and request an approved channel.

Examples

Use this compact input and expected handoff to calibrate scope and evidence quality.

Input:

incident=ALG-42; window=10m; target=products_readonly; bundle-limit=5MB

Expected handoff:

artifacts=7; secret-scan=pass; production-records=0; transfer=pending-review

Resources

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Add a synthetic-data CI gate for customer-owned Abridge integration code. Test consent handling, note-review handoffs, redaction, and rollback behavior with mocked vendor boundaries, without connecting CI to a live Abridge or EHR tenant.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Adding regression checks to an Abridge integration repository
  • Testing consent and note-release handling
  • Checking logs for sensitive data exposure
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28672026年10月23日 更新

Triage Abridge recording, note review, Epic handoff, and access problems using observed symptoms and approved guidance. Identify the affected workflow stage, organize a minimal timeline, and prepare a redacted escalation record for the responsible team.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Separate recording problems from upload failures
  • Investigate note creation delays and editor issues
  • Identify the responsible team for Epic handoff failures
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28672026年10月23日 更新

Map and review an Abridge clinical documentation workflow from consent and recording through draft review, evidence checks, edits, and final disposition. Keep clinician approval explicit, identify failure exits, and separate verified facts from tenant-specific details and pending approvals.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Map a clinical note workflow for a care setting
  • Check where consent and patient identity are verified
  • Review draft notes against linked evidence before sign-off
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28672026年10月23日 更新

Audit how clinician-reviewed Abridge note sections map into Epic templates and downstream workflows. Use approved test records to document destinations, exceptions, evidence, rollback steps, and a go or no-go decision for a specific environment.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Checking Abridge note section mappings to Epic templates
  • Auditing a department’s approved documentation handoff
  • Preparing test evidence and a go or no-go decision
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28672026年10月23日 更新

Review Abridge adoption and workflow value using local usage records, clinician feedback, and verified contract costs. Build an evidence based decision table covering adoption, quality, support burden, and options to expand, hold, or improve the rollout.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Reviewing adoption after an Abridge rollout
  • Preparing evidence for a renewal decision
  • Comparing workflow outcomes across care settings
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28672026年10月23日 更新

Prepare a bounded support bundle for an Abridge issue using allowlisted operational details such as versions, coarse timestamps, and correlation references. Exclude recordings, transcripts, patient identifiers, credentials, and unrestricted logs, then document redactions and review details.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Preparing reviewed evidence for an Abridge support case
  • Documenting redactions and excluded data
  • Collecting approved operational details for an incident
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28672026年10月23日 更新

查看 jeremylongshore 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题