跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

analyzing-query-performance

Investigate slow queries in PostgreSQL, MySQL, and MongoDB using execution plans, which show how queries run, and performance metrics. Produce index suggestions, query rewrites, and configuration recommendations ranked by likely impact and implementation effort.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

Execute use when you need to work with query optimization. This skill provides query performance analysis with comprehensive guidance and automation. Trigger with phrases like "optimize queries", "analyze performance", or "improve query speed".

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Investigating slow dashboard queries
  • Reviewing missing and unused indexes
  • Finding repeated queries on list pages
  • Comparing query plans before and after changes

包含的文件(4)

  • SKILL.md6.9 KB
  • assets/README.md180 B
  • references/README.md69 B
  • scripts/README.md380 B

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Query Performance Analyzer

Overview

Analyze slow database queries using execution plans, wait statistics, and I/O metrics across PostgreSQL, MySQL, and MongoDB. This skill captures EXPLAIN output, identifies sequential scans on large tables, detects missing indexes, measures buffer cache hit ratios, and produces actionable optimization recommendations ranked by expected performance impact.

Prerequisites

  • Database credentials with permissions to run EXPLAIN ANALYZE (PostgreSQL), EXPLAIN FORMAT=JSON (MySQL), or explain() (MongoDB)
  • pg_stat_statements extension enabled for PostgreSQL (provides aggregated query statistics)
  • Access to slow query logs or performance_schema (MySQL)
  • Baseline query execution times for comparison
  • psql, mysql, or mongosh CLI tools installed

Instructions

  1. Identify the slowest queries by examining pg_stat_statements (PostgreSQL): SELECT query, calls, mean_exec_time, total_exec_time FROM pg_stat_statements ORDER BY mean_exec_time DESC LIMIT 20. For MySQL, enable and query the slow query log or performance_schema.events_statements_summary_by_digest.

  2. Run EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, BUFFERS, FORMAT JSON) on each slow query in PostgreSQL, or EXPLAIN ANALYZE FORMAT=JSON in MySQL. Capture the full execution plan including actual row counts, loop iterations, and buffer usage.

  3. Analyze the execution plan for these red flags:

    • Sequential scans on tables with >10,000 rows (indicates missing index)
    • Nested loop joins with high outer row counts (consider hash join or merge join)
    • Sort operations without index support (adding a covering index eliminates the sort)
    • High rows_removed_by_filter relative to rows (predicate not selective enough)
    • Bitmap heap scans with high recheck rate (index selectivity too low)
  4. Check buffer cache performance: SELECT heap_blks_read, heap_blks_hit, heap_blks_hit::float / (heap_blks_hit + heap_blks_read) AS cache_hit_ratio FROM pg_statio_user_tables WHERE relname = 'table_name'. A ratio below 0.95 suggests the working set exceeds available shared_buffers.

  5. Evaluate index usage with SELECT indexrelname, idx_scan, idx_tup_read, idx_tup_fetch FROM pg_stat_user_indexes WHERE schemaname = 'public' ORDER BY idx_scan ASC. Indexes with zero scans are unused and waste write performance.

  6. Check for table bloat using SELECT relname, n_live_tup, n_dead_tup, n_dead_tup::float / GREATEST(n_live_tup, 1) AS dead_ratio FROM pg_stat_user_tables WHERE n_dead_tup > 1000 ORDER BY dead_ratio DESC. A dead tuple ratio above 0.2 indicates the table needs VACUUM.

  7. For each identified issue, generate a specific recommendation: CREATE INDEX statement with the exact columns, query rewrite suggestions, or configuration parameter adjustments.

  8. Estimate the performance impact of each recommendation by comparing the EXPLAIN plan before and after applying the change on a staging database or by analyzing the expected row reduction from new indexes.

  9. Prioritize recommendations by impact-to-effort ratio: index additions (high impact, low effort) before query rewrites (medium impact, medium effort) before schema changes (high impact, high effort).

  10. Generate a performance analysis report with before/after execution plans, estimated improvements, and implementation priority ranking.

Output

  • Slow query inventory with execution frequency, mean/P95 duration, and total time consumed
  • Annotated execution plans highlighting sequential scans, sort bottlenecks, and join inefficiencies
  • Index recommendations as ready-to-execute CREATE INDEX statements with expected impact
  • Query rewrite suggestions with original and optimized SQL side by side
  • Buffer cache analysis with shared_buffers sizing recommendations
  • Performance report ranking all findings by severity and implementation priority

Error Handling

ErrorCauseSolution
EXPLAIN ANALYZE takes too long on productionQuery modifies data or runs for minutesUse EXPLAIN without ANALYZE for estimated plans; run EXPLAIN ANALYZE on staging with representative data
pg_stat_statements not availableExtension not installed or not in shared_preload_librariesRun CREATE EXTENSION pg_stat_statements; add to shared_preload_libraries in postgresql.conf and restart
Execution plan differs between staging and productionDifferent data distribution, statistics, or configurationRun ANALYZE on staging tables to update statistics; match work_mem, random_page_cost, and effective_cache_size settings
Index recommendation causes slow writesToo many indexes on a write-heavy tableLimit indexes to 5-7 per table; use partial indexes to reduce scope; consider covering indexes to replace multiple single-column indexes
Query plan uses wrong indexStale statistics or cost model miscalculationRun ANALYZE table_name to refresh statistics; adjust random_page_cost for SSD storage; use SET enable_seqscan = off to test index plans

Examples

Optimizing a dashboard aggregate query: A query computing daily revenue with GROUP BY date and JOIN across orders and line_items takes 12 seconds. EXPLAIN reveals a sequential scan on line_items (5M rows). Adding a composite index on (order_id, created_at) with INCLUDE (amount) reduces execution to 200ms by enabling an index-only scan.

Diagnosing N+1 query pattern: Application loads a list page showing 50 products, each with a separate query for category name. pg_stat_statements reveals SELECT name FROM categories WHERE id = $1 called 50 times per page load. Resolution: rewrite as a single JOIN query or implement eager loading in the ORM.

Identifying bloated table causing cache misses: Buffer cache hit ratio drops to 0.78 on the sessions table. Investigation reveals 80% dead tuples due to aggressive INSERT/DELETE cycling without autovacuum tuning. Setting autovacuum_vacuum_scale_factor = 0.01 and running VACUUM FULL restores cache hit ratio to 0.99.

Resources

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Add a synthetic-data CI gate for customer-owned Abridge integration code. Test consent handling, note-review handoffs, redaction, and rollback behavior with mocked vendor boundaries, without connecting CI to a live Abridge or EHR tenant.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Adding regression checks to an Abridge integration repository
  • Testing consent and note-release handling
  • Checking logs for sensitive data exposure
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28682026年10月25日 更新

Triage Abridge recording, note review, Epic handoff, and access problems using observed symptoms and approved guidance. Identify the affected workflow stage, organize a minimal timeline, and prepare a redacted escalation record for the responsible team.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Separate recording problems from upload failures
  • Investigate note creation delays and editor issues
  • Identify the responsible team for Epic handoff failures
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28682026年10月25日 更新

Map and review an Abridge clinical documentation workflow from consent and recording through draft review, evidence checks, edits, and final disposition. Keep clinician approval explicit, identify failure exits, and separate verified facts from tenant-specific details and pending approvals.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Map a clinical note workflow for a care setting
  • Check where consent and patient identity are verified
  • Review draft notes against linked evidence before sign-off
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28682026年10月25日 更新

Audit how clinician-reviewed Abridge note sections map into Epic templates and downstream workflows. Use approved test records to document destinations, exceptions, evidence, rollback steps, and a go or no-go decision for a specific environment.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Checking Abridge note section mappings to Epic templates
  • Auditing a department’s approved documentation handoff
  • Preparing test evidence and a go or no-go decision
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28682026年10月25日 更新

Review Abridge adoption and workflow value using local usage records, clinician feedback, and verified contract costs. Build an evidence based decision table covering adoption, quality, support burden, and options to expand, hold, or improve the rollout.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Reviewing adoption after an Abridge rollout
  • Preparing evidence for a renewal decision
  • Comparing workflow outcomes across care settings
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28682026年10月25日 更新

Prepare a bounded support bundle for an Abridge issue using allowlisted operational details such as versions, coarse timestamps, and correlation references. Exclude recordings, transcripts, patient identifiers, credentials, and unrestricted logs, then document redactions and review details.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Preparing reviewed evidence for an Abridge support case
  • Documenting redactions and excluded data
  • Collecting approved operational details for an incident
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28682026年10月25日 更新

查看 jeremylongshore 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题