跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

analyzing-security-headers

Audit a website’s HTTP and HTTPS security headers and cookie settings to find missing protections, configuration errors, and exposed server details. Get a security grade, prioritized fixes, and configuration examples for Nginx, Apache, and Cloudflare.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

Analyze HTTP security headers of web domains to identify vulnerabilities and misconfigurations. Use when you need to audit website security headers, assess header compliance, or get security recommendations for web applications. Trigger with phrases like "analyze security headers", "check HTTP headers", "audit website security headers", or "evaluate CSP and HSTS configuration".

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Review CSP and HSTS settings
  • Compare HTTP and HTTPS security headers
  • Check cookie security attributes
  • Rank multiple domains by security grade

包含的文件(9)

  • SKILL.md4.9 KB
  • assets/README.md64 B
  • references/errors.md1.2 KB
  • references/examples.md327 B
  • references/implementation.md2.0 KB
  • references/README.md68 B
  • scripts/analyze_headers.py4.7 KB
  • scripts/generate_report.py3.6 KB
  • scripts/README.md359 B

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Analyzing Security Headers

Overview

Evaluate HTTP response headers for web applications against OWASP Secure Headers Project recommendations and browser security baselines. Identify missing, misconfigured, or information-leaking headers across both HTTP and HTTPS responses.

Prerequisites

  • Target URL or domain name accessible over the network
  • Authorization to perform HTTP requests against the target domain
  • Network connectivity for both HTTP and HTTPS protocols
  • Optional: write access to ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/security-reports/ for persisting results

Instructions

  1. Accept the target domain. If only a domain name is provided, default to https://. For batch analysis, accept a newline-separated list.
  2. Fetch response headers using WebFetch for both HTTP and HTTPS endpoints. Record the full redirect chain and final destination URL.
  3. Evaluate critical headers -- flag any that are missing or misconfigured:
    • Strict-Transport-Security: require max-age>=31536000, includeSubDomains, and preload eligibility
    • Content-Security-Policy: check for unsafe-inline, unsafe-eval, overly broad default-src, and missing frame-ancestors
    • X-Frame-Options: require DENY or SAMEORIGIN
    • X-Content-Type-Options: require nosniff
    • Permissions-Policy: verify camera, microphone, geolocation restrictions
  4. Evaluate important headers -- report status and recommendations:
    • Referrer-Policy: recommend strict-origin-when-cross-origin or no-referrer
    • Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy (COEP), Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy (COOP), Cross-Origin-Resource-Policy (CORP)
  5. Check for information disclosure -- flag Server, X-Powered-By, X-AspNet-Version, and any header revealing technology stack or version numbers.
  6. Inspect cookie attributes on Set-Cookie headers: verify Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite=Lax|Strict, and __Host-/__Secure- prefix usage.
  7. Calculate a security grade: A+ (95-100), A (85-94), B (75-84), C (65-74), D (50-64), F (<50) based on weighted presence and correctness of each header.
  8. Generate per-header remediation directives with configuration examples for Nginx, Apache, and Cloudflare.

See references/implementation.md for the five-phase implementation workflow.

Output

  • Headers Analysis Report: overall grade, per-header status (present/missing/misconfigured), and risk impact
  • Remediation Checklist: prioritized fixes with server configuration snippets
  • Cookie Security Assessment: attribute compliance for each Set-Cookie header
  • Comparison Table: side-by-side HTTP vs. HTTPS header differences

Error Handling

ErrorCauseSolution
Failed to connect to domainDNS resolution failure, firewall block, or domain downVerify domain spelling and DNS records; test alternate protocols
SSL certificate verification failedExpired, self-signed, or mismatched certificateNote TLS issue in report; indicates HSTS not properly enforced
Too many redirectsRedirect loop between HTTP and HTTPSReport the redirect chain and analyze headers at each hop
HTTP 429 Too Many RequestsRate limiting by target serverImplement backoff; queue domain for delayed re-analysis
Headers differ between HTTP and HTTPSInconsistent server configurationReport both sets; highlight critical differences and flag HSTS gap

Examples

  • "Analyze security headers for https://tonsofskills.com and explain any CSP or HSTS issues."
  • "Check headers for example.com on both HTTP and HTTPS and provide an Nginx remediation config."
  • "Batch-analyze headers for five staging domains and rank them by security grade."

Resources

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Add a synthetic-data CI gate for customer-owned Abridge integration code. Test consent handling, note-review handoffs, redaction, and rollback behavior with mocked vendor boundaries, without connecting CI to a live Abridge or EHR tenant.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Adding regression checks to an Abridge integration repository
  • Testing consent and note-release handling
  • Checking logs for sensitive data exposure
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28692026年10月25日 更新

Triage Abridge recording, note review, Epic handoff, and access problems using observed symptoms and approved guidance. Identify the affected workflow stage, organize a minimal timeline, and prepare a redacted escalation record for the responsible team.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Separate recording problems from upload failures
  • Investigate note creation delays and editor issues
  • Identify the responsible team for Epic handoff failures
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28692026年10月25日 更新

Map and review an Abridge clinical documentation workflow from consent and recording through draft review, evidence checks, edits, and final disposition. Keep clinician approval explicit, identify failure exits, and separate verified facts from tenant-specific details and pending approvals.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Map a clinical note workflow for a care setting
  • Check where consent and patient identity are verified
  • Review draft notes against linked evidence before sign-off
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28692026年10月25日 更新

Audit how clinician-reviewed Abridge note sections map into Epic templates and downstream workflows. Use approved test records to document destinations, exceptions, evidence, rollback steps, and a go or no-go decision for a specific environment.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Checking Abridge note section mappings to Epic templates
  • Auditing a department’s approved documentation handoff
  • Preparing test evidence and a go or no-go decision
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28692026年10月25日 更新

Review Abridge adoption and workflow value using local usage records, clinician feedback, and verified contract costs. Build an evidence based decision table covering adoption, quality, support burden, and options to expand, hold, or improve the rollout.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Reviewing adoption after an Abridge rollout
  • Preparing evidence for a renewal decision
  • Comparing workflow outcomes across care settings
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28692026年10月25日 更新

Prepare a bounded support bundle for an Abridge issue using allowlisted operational details such as versions, coarse timestamps, and correlation references. Exclude recordings, transcripts, patient identifiers, credentials, and unrestricted logs, then document redactions and review details.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Preparing reviewed evidence for an Abridge support case
  • Documenting redactions and excluded data
  • Collecting approved operational details for an incident
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28692026年10月25日 更新

查看 jeremylongshore 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题