跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

anima-core-workflow-a

Build a review-driven pipeline that scans approved Figma components, generates React code with the Anima SDK, and detects design changes. It confines generated files to approved paths and prepares a change for review before code is accepted.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

Build automated Figma-to-React pipeline with the Anima SDK. Use when automating design handoff, building CI/CD design-to-code workflows, or creating a design system code generator from Figma components. Trigger with: "anima design pipeline", "figma to react pipeline", "automated design handoff", "anima component generator".

集成工具Figma

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Automating handoff from Figma components to React
  • Generating code for an approved design system
  • Detecting Figma revisions and preparing review changes

包含的文件(2)

  • SKILL.md7.8 KB
  • references/official-docs.md745 B

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Anima Core Workflow A — Figma-to-React Pipeline

Overview

Build a review-driven Figma-to-React pipeline. Detect an approved source revision, generate only allowlisted nodes, contain the output, and open a review change; never turn a Figma change directly into merged or deployed application code.

Prerequisites

  • Completed anima-install-auth setup
  • Figma file with organized components (auto-layout recommended)
  • React project (Next.js, Vite, or CRA)

Authentication

Create the Anima client only on the backend with ANIMA_TOKEN; pass a managed FIGMA_TOKEN for the allowlisted file to generateCode. Stop on either token's 401/403 result and correct access without widening the source allowlist.

Instructions

Step 1: Design System Scanner

// src/pipeline/figma-scanner.ts
import { Anima } from '@animaapp/anima-sdk';

interface FigmaComponent {
  nodeId: string;
  name: string;
  type: 'COMPONENT' | 'FRAME' | 'COMPONENT_SET';
}

const anima = new Anima({
  auth: { token: process.env.ANIMA_TOKEN! },
});

// Fetch all top-level components from a Figma page
async function scanFigmaComponents(fileKey: string) {
  const response = await fetch(
    `https://api.figma.com/v1/files/${fileKey}/components`,
    { headers: { 'X-Figma-Token': process.env.FIGMA_TOKEN! } }
  );
  const data = await response.json();

  return data.meta.components.map((comp: any) => ({
    nodeId: comp.node_id,
    name: comp.name,
    type: comp.containing_frame?.type || 'COMPONENT',
  }));
}

Step 2: Batch Code Generator

// src/pipeline/batch-generator.ts
import { Anima } from '@animaapp/anima-sdk';
import fs from 'fs';
import path from 'path';

const anima = new Anima({
  auth: { token: process.env.ANIMA_TOKEN! },
});

interface GenerationConfig {
  fileKey: string;
  outputDir: string;
  settings: {
    language: 'typescript' | 'javascript';
    framework: 'react' | 'html';
    styling: 'plain_css' | 'tailwind' | 'inline_styles';
    uiLibrary?: 'mui' | 'antd' | 'radix' | 'shadcn' | 'clean_react' | 'custom_design_system';
  };
}

async function generateComponentBatch(
  config: GenerationConfig,
  nodeIds: string[],
): Promise<{ generated: number; failed: string[] }> {
  const failed: string[] = [];
  let generated = 0;

  fs.mkdirSync(config.outputDir, { recursive: true });

  // Generate each component (Anima processes one node at a time)
  for (const nodeId of nodeIds) {
    try {
      const { files } = await anima.generateCode({
        fileKey: config.fileKey,
        figmaToken: process.env.FIGMA_TOKEN!,
        nodesId: [nodeId],
        settings: config.settings,
      });

      for (const [fileName, file] of Object.entries(files)) {
        const root = path.resolve(config.outputDir);
        const filePath = path.resolve(root, fileName);
        if (!filePath.startsWith(`${root}${path.sep}`) || file.isBinary) {
          throw new Error(`Rejected generated file: ${fileName}`);
        }
        fs.mkdirSync(path.dirname(filePath), { recursive: true });
        fs.writeFileSync(filePath, file.content);
        console.log(`Generated: ${fileName}`);
      }
      generated++;
    } catch {
      console.error({ failureClass: 'node-generation-failed', nodeId });
      failed.push(nodeId);
    }

    // Concurrency and retry policy belong to the measured rate-limit workflow.
  }

  return { generated, failed };
}

export { generateComponentBatch, GenerationConfig };

Step 3: Figma Change Detection

// src/pipeline/change-detector.ts
interface FileVersion {
  id: string;
  created_at: string;
  label: string;
}

async function getLatestVersion(fileKey: string) {
  const response = await fetch(
    `https://api.figma.com/v1/files/${fileKey}/versions`,
    { headers: { 'X-Figma-Token': process.env.FIGMA_TOKEN! } }
  );
  const data = await response.json();
  return data.versions[0];
}

// Check if file changed since last generation
let lastVersionId = '';

async function hasDesignChanged(fileKey: string) {
  const latest = await getLatestVersion(fileKey);
  if (latest.id !== lastVersionId) {
    lastVersionId = latest.id;
    return true;
  }
  return false;
}

export { hasDesignChanged, getLatestVersion };

Step 4: Full Pipeline Runner

// src/pipeline/run.ts
import { scanFigmaComponents } from './figma-scanner';
import { generateComponentBatch, GenerationConfig } from './batch-generator';
import { hasDesignChanged } from './change-detector';

const config: GenerationConfig = {
  fileKey: process.env.FIGMA_FILE_KEY!,
  outputDir: './src/components/generated',
  settings: {
    language: 'typescript',
    framework: 'react',
    styling: 'tailwind',
    uiLibrary: 'shadcn',
  },
};

async function runPipeline() {
  console.log('Scanning Figma file for components...');
  const components = await scanFigmaComponents(config.fileKey);
  console.log(`Found ${components.length} components`);

  console.log('Generating code...');
  const result = await generateComponentBatch(
    config,
    components.map(c => c.nodeId)
  );

  console.log(`\nPipeline complete: ${result.generated} generated, ${result.failed.length} failed`);
}

runPipeline().catch(() => {
  console.error({ failureClass: 'figma-pipeline-failed' });
  process.exitCode = 1;
});

Tool Discipline

Use Read and Grep to inspect the existing integration and generated diff before changing anything. Use Write or Edit only inside the approved generated-code, test, or configuration paths. Use the declared Bash commands only for the explicit install, validation, or diagnostic steps in this workflow; never print tokens, source designs, generated source, or private website captures.

Output

  • Automated Figma component scanning and enumeration
  • Batch code generation for entire design systems
  • Change detection for continuous design-to-code sync
  • A durable source-revision receipt suitable for a PR review gate

Examples

Create a staging Figma file with two approved components and configure the pipeline to write only to src/components/generated. Run one generation cycle, inspect the resulting diff, and run the project formatter, type check, and visual review before accepting either component. Persist the last approved Figma version outside the process so a restart does not regenerate an unknown set of nodes. If the scanner returns unexpected components, a generator writes outside the output directory, or validation fails, stop the watch loop and correct the node allowlist or design source before the next run.

Error Handling

ErrorCauseSolution
Rate limitedToo many API callsAdd 2s delay between component generations
Component not renderableFigma node is group, not frameEnsure components use auto-layout
Inconsistent outputComplex nested structuresFlatten deep nesting in Figma
Missing stylesCustom fonts not availableMap fonts in Anima settings

Resources

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Add a synthetic-data CI gate for customer-owned Abridge integration code. Test consent handling, note-review handoffs, redaction, and rollback behavior with mocked vendor boundaries, without connecting CI to a live Abridge or EHR tenant.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Adding regression checks to an Abridge integration repository
  • Testing consent and note-release handling
  • Checking logs for sensitive data exposure
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28682026年10月25日 更新

Triage Abridge recording, note review, Epic handoff, and access problems using observed symptoms and approved guidance. Identify the affected workflow stage, organize a minimal timeline, and prepare a redacted escalation record for the responsible team.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Separate recording problems from upload failures
  • Investigate note creation delays and editor issues
  • Identify the responsible team for Epic handoff failures
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28682026年10月25日 更新

Map and review an Abridge clinical documentation workflow from consent and recording through draft review, evidence checks, edits, and final disposition. Keep clinician approval explicit, identify failure exits, and separate verified facts from tenant-specific details and pending approvals.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Map a clinical note workflow for a care setting
  • Check where consent and patient identity are verified
  • Review draft notes against linked evidence before sign-off
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28682026年10月25日 更新

Audit how clinician-reviewed Abridge note sections map into Epic templates and downstream workflows. Use approved test records to document destinations, exceptions, evidence, rollback steps, and a go or no-go decision for a specific environment.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Checking Abridge note section mappings to Epic templates
  • Auditing a department’s approved documentation handoff
  • Preparing test evidence and a go or no-go decision
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28682026年10月25日 更新

Review Abridge adoption and workflow value using local usage records, clinician feedback, and verified contract costs. Build an evidence based decision table covering adoption, quality, support burden, and options to expand, hold, or improve the rollout.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Reviewing adoption after an Abridge rollout
  • Preparing evidence for a renewal decision
  • Comparing workflow outcomes across care settings
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28682026年10月25日 更新

Prepare a bounded support bundle for an Abridge issue using allowlisted operational details such as versions, coarse timestamps, and correlation references. Exclude recordings, transcripts, patient identifiers, credentials, and unrestricted logs, then document redactions and review details.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Preparing reviewed evidence for an Abridge support case
  • Documenting redactions and excluded data
  • Collecting approved operational details for an incident
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28682026年10月25日 更新

查看 jeremylongshore 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题