跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

anima-performance-tuning

Improve Anima design-to-code generation with version-aware caching and regeneration of changed components. Measure processing time, output size, and validation results to assess performance gains while preserving design fidelity, accessibility, and build requirements.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

Optimize Anima code generation performance with caching, parallelism, and output tuning. Use when reducing generation latency, optimizing batch component generation, or improving generated code quality for production use. Trigger with: "anima performance", "anima slow", "anima optimization", "anima caching".

集成工具Figma

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Reduce repeated generation of unchanged components
  • Benchmark generation with and without caching
  • Check output quality after performance changes

包含的文件(2)

  • SKILL.md6.8 KB
  • references/official-docs.md760 B

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Anima Performance Tuning

Overview

Improve design-to-code throughput without treating cache hits or smaller output as success unless the result still matches the approved design version, accessibility expectations, and project build contract.

Measurement Contract

Record source-fetch, queue, generation, asset, validation, and review durations separately. Establish targets from the team's own representative fixtures and provider agreement; do not present illustrative latency or quota numbers as an Anima service-level objective.

Prerequisites

  • A representative staging fixture and a baseline measurement of generation duration, cache hit rate, failure rate, and generated-code validation result.
  • A version-aware cache key and retention policy that ties each artifact to Figma source version, node ID, and generation settings.
  • Review gates for generated output so performance changes cannot automatically replace approved components or strip required licenses/accessibility content.

Authentication

Load ANIMA_TOKEN and the source-scoped FIGMA_TOKEN only in the backend worker. Performance tests use synthetic allowlisted sources; do not broaden credentials or retry authorization failures to make a benchmark complete.

Instructions

Step 1: File-Based Generation Cache

// src/performance/cache.ts
import crypto from 'crypto';
import fs from 'fs';
import { Anima } from '@animaapp/anima-sdk';

class GenerationCache {
  private dir: string;

  constructor(cacheDir = '.anima-cache') {
    this.dir = cacheDir;
    fs.mkdirSync(cacheDir, { recursive: true });
  }

  private hash(fileKey: string, sourceRevision: string, nodeId: string, settings: object): string {
    return crypto.createHash('sha256').update(`${fileKey}:${sourceRevision}:${nodeId}:${JSON.stringify(settings)}`).digest('hex');
  }

  async getOrGenerate(
    anima: Anima,
    params: Parameters<Anima['generateCode']>[0],
    sourceRevision: string,
    maxAgeMs: number = 3600000, // 1 hour
  ): Promise<Awaited<ReturnType<Anima['generateCode']>>> {
    const key = this.hash(params.fileKey, sourceRevision, params.nodesId[0], params.settings);
    const path = `${this.dir}/${key}.json`;

    if (fs.existsSync(path)) {
      const stat = fs.statSync(path);
      if (Date.now() - stat.mtimeMs < maxAgeMs) {
        return JSON.parse(fs.readFileSync(path, 'utf8'));
      }
    }

    const result = await anima.generateCode(params);
    fs.writeFileSync(path, JSON.stringify(result));
    return result;
  }

  clearOlderThan(maxAgeMs: number): number {
    let cleared = 0;
    for (const file of fs.readdirSync(this.dir)) {
      const path = `${this.dir}/${file}`;
      if (Date.now() - fs.statSync(path).mtimeMs > maxAgeMs) {
        fs.unlinkSync(path);
        cleared++;
      }
    }
    return cleared;
  }
}

export { GenerationCache };

Step 2: Incremental Generation (Only Changed Components)

// src/performance/incremental.ts
// Only regenerate components whose Figma nodes changed

async function getNodeLastModified(fileKey: string, nodeId: string): Promise<string> {
  const res = await fetch(
    `https://api.figma.com/v1/files/${fileKey}/nodes?ids=${nodeId}`,
    { headers: { 'X-Figma-Token': process.env.FIGMA_TOKEN! } }
  );
  const data = await res.json();
  return data.lastModified;
}

async function generateOnlyChanged(
  anima: any,
  fileKey: string,
  nodeIds: string[],
  lastModifiedCache: Map<string, string>,
): Promise<string[]> {
  const changed: string[] = [];

  for (const nodeId of nodeIds) {
    const lastMod = await getNodeLastModified(fileKey, nodeId);
    if (lastMod !== lastModifiedCache.get(nodeId)) {
      changed.push(nodeId);
      lastModifiedCache.set(nodeId, lastMod);
    }
  }

  console.log(`${changed.length}/${nodeIds.length} components changed — regenerating`);
  return changed;
}

Step 3: Validate Output Without Semantic Rewriting

// Preserve generated semantics; measure before applying reviewed transforms.
function recordOutput(fileName: string, content: string) {
  return {
    fileName,
    bytes: Buffer.byteLength(content),
    digest: crypto.createHash('sha256').update(content).digest('hex'),
  };
}

Tool Discipline

Use Read and Grep to inspect the existing integration and generated diff before changing anything. Use Write or Edit only inside the approved generated-code, test, or configuration paths. Use the declared Bash commands only for the explicit install, validation, or diagnostic steps in this workflow; never print tokens, source designs, generated source, or private website captures.

Output

  • File-based generation cache with TTL
  • Incremental generation (only changed components)
  • Output size and digest measurements without destructive rewriting

Examples

Benchmark ten approved staging components once without cache and once with the cache keyed by source version, node ID, and settings. Compare duration, API calls, output size, lint/type results, and visual review rather than just cache hit rate. Regenerate only components whose recorded source version changed, and keep the prior generated artifact available for diff review. If a cache entry cannot prove its source version, post-processing changes required behavior, or rate limits increase, disable the optimization and return to the prior validated generation path while investigating the aggregate measurements.

Error Handling

FailureResponse
Cache artifact lacks valid source/version metadataRefuse reuse and regenerate the approved component.
Incremental detector cannot determine change stateTreat the affected component as needing controlled regeneration.
Optimizer changes semantics or removes required contentRevert the post-processing rule and restore the reviewed artifact.
Throughput increases provider failures or rate limitsReduce concurrency, apply bounded backoff, and preserve user-visible job state.

Resources

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Add a synthetic-data CI gate for customer-owned Abridge integration code. Test consent handling, note-review handoffs, redaction, and rollback behavior with mocked vendor boundaries, without connecting CI to a live Abridge or EHR tenant.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Adding regression checks to an Abridge integration repository
  • Testing consent and note-release handling
  • Checking logs for sensitive data exposure
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28672026年10月23日 更新

Triage Abridge recording, note review, Epic handoff, and access problems using observed symptoms and approved guidance. Identify the affected workflow stage, organize a minimal timeline, and prepare a redacted escalation record for the responsible team.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Separate recording problems from upload failures
  • Investigate note creation delays and editor issues
  • Identify the responsible team for Epic handoff failures
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28672026年10月23日 更新

Map and review an Abridge clinical documentation workflow from consent and recording through draft review, evidence checks, edits, and final disposition. Keep clinician approval explicit, identify failure exits, and separate verified facts from tenant-specific details and pending approvals.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Map a clinical note workflow for a care setting
  • Check where consent and patient identity are verified
  • Review draft notes against linked evidence before sign-off
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28672026年10月23日 更新

Audit how clinician-reviewed Abridge note sections map into Epic templates and downstream workflows. Use approved test records to document destinations, exceptions, evidence, rollback steps, and a go or no-go decision for a specific environment.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Checking Abridge note section mappings to Epic templates
  • Auditing a department’s approved documentation handoff
  • Preparing test evidence and a go or no-go decision
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28672026年10月23日 更新

Review Abridge adoption and workflow value using local usage records, clinician feedback, and verified contract costs. Build an evidence based decision table covering adoption, quality, support burden, and options to expand, hold, or improve the rollout.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Reviewing adoption after an Abridge rollout
  • Preparing evidence for a renewal decision
  • Comparing workflow outcomes across care settings
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28672026年10月23日 更新

Prepare a bounded support bundle for an Abridge issue using allowlisted operational details such as versions, coarse timestamps, and correlation references. Exclude recordings, transcripts, patient identifiers, credentials, and unrestricted logs, then document redactions and review details.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Preparing reviewed evidence for an Abridge support case
  • Documenting redactions and excluded data
  • Collecting approved operational details for an incident
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28672026年10月23日 更新

查看 jeremylongshore 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题