跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

anima-security-basics

Harden credentials and access in Anima and Figma design-to-code pipelines. Check token scope, server-side use, secret storage, and generated artifacts so exposed credentials or unapproved design access stop the pipeline safely.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

Audit and harden Anima and Figma tokens for design-to-code pipelines. Use when protecting API credentials, restricting Figma access scope, or hardening CI/CD design automation pipelines. Trigger with: "anima security", "anima token safety", "figma token security".

集成工具Figma

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Review Figma token scopes and approved file access
  • Keep Anima and Figma credentials out of browser code
  • Check CI pipeline settings for exposed secrets

包含的文件(2)

  • SKILL.md6.1 KB
  • references/official-docs.md751 B

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Anima Security Basics

Overview

This workflow protects the Anima and Figma credentials used by a design-to-code pipeline while keeping generated output reviewable. It applies least privilege to the design source, keeps tokens on the server, and makes secret exposure or unexpected file access a fail-closed condition.

Prerequisites

  • A managed secret store and separate development, staging, and production bindings for ANIMA_TOKEN and FIGMA_TOKEN.
  • An allowlist of Figma file keys and component node IDs, with an owner for each design source and a documented rotation/revocation contact.
  • A non-production fixture and a disposable staging workspace for testing token scope, generated artifacts, and rollback behavior.
  • Repository secret scanning and a deterministic generated-code directory; never use real customer or personal design data as the test fixture.

Security Checklist

  • Anima token stored in secret manager (not .env in prod)
  • Figma token uses only the endpoint-required granular read scopes
  • SDK runs server-side only (never ship tokens to browser)
  • .env files gitignored and chmod 600
  • CI secrets stored in GitHub Secrets, not workflow files
  • Generated code reviewed before committing (no embedded tokens)

Instructions

Step 1: Figma Token Scope Restriction

# When creating a Figma Personal Access Token:
# - Start with file_content:read for file/node content.
# - Add file_metadata:read, file_versions:read, or library read scopes only
#   when the selected endpoint requires them.
# - Do not use the deprecated broad files:read scope for new integrations.
# - Set an organization-approved expiration date.
# - Create separate tokens for dev vs CI environments

Step 2: Server-Side Only Enforcement

// src/anima/safety.ts
// Anima SDK is designed for server-side use only

function validateEnvironment(): void {
  if (typeof window !== 'undefined') {
    throw new Error('Anima SDK must run server-side only — never import in browser code');
  }
  if (!process.env.ANIMA_TOKEN) throw new Error('ANIMA_TOKEN not set');
  if (!process.env.FIGMA_TOKEN) throw new Error('FIGMA_TOKEN not set');
}

// Call this at startup
validateEnvironment();

Error Handling

FailureRequired response
Secret manager is unavailable or a required token is emptyAbort before any Figma or Anima request; emit only a redacted reason and retry through the deployment system.
A browser bundle imports the SDK or contains a tokenFail the build, remove the artifact, and rotate any credential that may have been exposed.
Figma returns an authorization or scope errorStop the run and review the file/node allowlist; do not broaden scopes automatically.
A token is expired, over-scoped, or present in logs/artifactsRevoke and replace it through the managed store, then rerun the leak scan before enabling the pipeline.
Generated code contains credentials or unapproved source contentQuarantine the output and block the merge; retain only a sanitized finding and artifact digest.

All failures should preserve the previous known-good generated revision. Do not print token values, design content, personal identifiers, or full request payloads while diagnosing a failure.

Step 3: Secret Manager Integration

// src/anima/secrets.ts
async function loadAnimaSecrets(): Promise<{ animaToken: string; figmaToken: string }> {
  const { SecretManagerServiceClient } = await import('@google-cloud/secret-manager');
  const client = new SecretManagerServiceClient();

  const [animaVersion] = await client.accessSecretVersion({
    name: `projects/${process.env.GCP_PROJECT}/secrets/anima-token/versions/latest`,
  });
  const [figmaVersion] = await client.accessSecretVersion({
    name: `projects/${process.env.GCP_PROJECT}/secrets/figma-token/versions/latest`,
  });

  return {
    animaToken: animaVersion.payload?.data?.toString() || '',
    figmaToken: figmaVersion.payload?.data?.toString() || '',
  };
}

Tool Discipline

Use Read and Grep to inspect the existing integration and generated diff before changing anything. Use Write or Edit only inside the approved generated-code, test, or configuration paths. Use the declared Bash commands only for the explicit install, validation, or diagnostic steps in this workflow; never print tokens, source designs, generated source, or private website captures.

Output

  • Figma token with minimal scope (read-only)
  • Server-side enforcement preventing browser usage
  • Secrets loaded from cloud secret manager

Examples

Run a staging preflight with an allowlisted synthetic file and verify that the process can read the managed bindings without revealing their values:

export FIGMA_FILE_KEY="synthetic-staging-file"
node scripts/anima-preflight.mjs \
  --file-key "$FIGMA_FILE_KEY" \
  --node-id "1:2" \
  --check-token-scope \
  --assert-server-only \
  --redact-output

The preflight should fail closed if either secret is absent, the file or node is not allowlisted, or a generated artifact contains a token. Record only the environment, source identifier, scope result, artifact digest, and cleanup result in the receipt; never record the credentials or design contents.

Resources

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Add a synthetic-data CI gate for customer-owned Abridge integration code. Test consent handling, note-review handoffs, redaction, and rollback behavior with mocked vendor boundaries, without connecting CI to a live Abridge or EHR tenant.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Adding regression checks to an Abridge integration repository
  • Testing consent and note-release handling
  • Checking logs for sensitive data exposure
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28682026年10月25日 更新

Triage Abridge recording, note review, Epic handoff, and access problems using observed symptoms and approved guidance. Identify the affected workflow stage, organize a minimal timeline, and prepare a redacted escalation record for the responsible team.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Separate recording problems from upload failures
  • Investigate note creation delays and editor issues
  • Identify the responsible team for Epic handoff failures
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28682026年10月25日 更新

Map and review an Abridge clinical documentation workflow from consent and recording through draft review, evidence checks, edits, and final disposition. Keep clinician approval explicit, identify failure exits, and separate verified facts from tenant-specific details and pending approvals.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Map a clinical note workflow for a care setting
  • Check where consent and patient identity are verified
  • Review draft notes against linked evidence before sign-off
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28682026年10月25日 更新

Audit how clinician-reviewed Abridge note sections map into Epic templates and downstream workflows. Use approved test records to document destinations, exceptions, evidence, rollback steps, and a go or no-go decision for a specific environment.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Checking Abridge note section mappings to Epic templates
  • Auditing a department’s approved documentation handoff
  • Preparing test evidence and a go or no-go decision
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28682026年10月25日 更新

Review Abridge adoption and workflow value using local usage records, clinician feedback, and verified contract costs. Build an evidence based decision table covering adoption, quality, support burden, and options to expand, hold, or improve the rollout.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Reviewing adoption after an Abridge rollout
  • Preparing evidence for a renewal decision
  • Comparing workflow outcomes across care settings
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28682026年10月25日 更新

Prepare a bounded support bundle for an Abridge issue using allowlisted operational details such as versions, coarse timestamps, and correlation references. Exclude recordings, transcripts, patient identifiers, credentials, and unrestricted logs, then document redactions and review details.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Preparing reviewed evidence for an Abridge support case
  • Documenting redactions and excluded data
  • Collecting approved operational details for an incident
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28682026年10月25日 更新

查看 jeremylongshore 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题