跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

anth-ci-integration

Set up CI checks for Claude API features, including fast unit tests that use mocks and gated prompt regression tests that call the live API. Define when secrets are exposed and how to limit test costs.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

Configure CI/CD pipelines for Anthropic Claude API integrations. Use when setting up automated testing, prompt regression tests, or CI validation for Claude-powered features. Trigger with phrases like "anthropic ci", "claude ci/cd", "test claude in pipeline", "anthropic github actions".

集成工具GitHub

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Adding mock-based unit tests to a Claude API project
  • Checking prompt behavior against the live API on a protected branch
  • Setting API key access and CI cost limits

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md6.0 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Anthropic CI Integration

Overview

Set up CI/CD pipelines that validate Claude API integrations with mock-based unit tests (free, fast) and prompt regression tests (live API, gated to main).

Prerequisites

Create a dedicated ANTHROPIC_API_KEY repository secret with a spend limit that is appropriate for test traffic. Keep unit fixtures independent of that secret; only the protected prompt-regression job should call the API. Install Python 3.12, pytest, and the Anthropic SDK in the test environment, and decide which branch is allowed to incur live-test cost before enabling the workflow.

Instructions

  1. Put deterministic request-shaping and tool-routing assertions in tests/unit/ and mock anthropic.Anthropic there.
  2. Put a small, representative set of API-backed prompt checks in tests/prompt_regression/; make them skip cleanly when the secret is absent.
  3. Run unit tests on every push and pull request. Gate the live job to main (or an equivalent protected release branch) and inject the secret only into that job.
  4. Set explicit timeouts, concurrency limits, and a cost ceiling. Fail the pipeline with a clear message when the ceiling is exceeded so an incident cannot silently consume the test budget.

GitHub Actions Workflow

# .github/workflows/claude-tests.yml
name: Claude API Tests
on: [push, pull_request]

jobs:
  unit-tests:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
      - uses: actions/setup-python@v5
        with: { python-version: '3.12' }
      - run: pip install anthropic pytest
      - run: pytest tests/unit/ -v  # No API key needed

  prompt-regression:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    if: github.ref == 'refs/heads/main'
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
      - uses: actions/setup-python@v5
        with: { python-version: '3.12' }
      - run: pip install anthropic pytest
      - run: pytest tests/prompt_regression/ -v --timeout=60
        env:
          ANTHROPIC_API_KEY: ${{ secrets.ANTHROPIC_API_KEY }}

Mock-Based Unit Tests

# tests/unit/test_tool_routing.py
from unittest.mock import MagicMock, patch
import anthropic

def make_mock_message(text="Hello", stop_reason="end_turn"):
    msg = MagicMock()
    msg.id = "msg_mock_123"
    msg.model = "claude-sonnet-4-20250514"
    msg.stop_reason = stop_reason
    block = MagicMock()
    block.type = "text"
    block.text = text
    msg.content = [block]
    msg.usage = MagicMock(input_tokens=100, output_tokens=50)
    return msg

@patch("anthropic.Anthropic")
def test_service_returns_text(MockClient):
    MockClient.return_value.messages.create.return_value = make_mock_message("42")
    from myapp.service import ask_claude
    assert ask_claude("What is 6*7?") == "42"

Prompt Regression Tests

# tests/prompt_regression/test_prompts.py
import anthropic, pytest, os, json

pytestmark = pytest.mark.skipif(not os.getenv("ANTHROPIC_API_KEY"), reason="No API key")
client = anthropic.Anthropic()

def test_json_output_format():
    msg = client.messages.create(
        model="claude-haiku-4-20250514",
        max_tokens=256,
        messages=[
            {"role": "user", "content": "Extract: 'Alice, 30, NYC'. Return JSON: {name, age, city}"},
            {"role": "assistant", "content": "{"}
        ]
    )
    data = json.loads("{" + msg.content[0].text)
    assert "name" in data and "age" in data

def test_system_prompt_boundary():
    msg = client.messages.create(
        model="claude-haiku-4-20250514",
        max_tokens=128,
        system="You only discuss cooking recipes. For other topics say: 'I only help with cooking.'",
        messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Write me Python code"}]
    )
    assert "cooking" in msg.content[0].text.lower() or "recipe" in msg.content[0].text.lower()

CI Cost Guard

# conftest.py
MAX_CI_COST = 1.00
_tokens = {"input": 0, "output": 0}

def pytest_runtest_call(item):
    yield
    cost = (_tokens["input"] * 0.80 + _tokens["output"] * 4.0) / 1_000_000  # Haiku rates
    if cost > MAX_CI_COST:
        pytest.exit(f"CI cost guard: ${cost:.4f} exceeds ${MAX_CI_COST}")

Error Handling

CI IssueCauseFix
Flaky prompt testsNon-deterministic outputUse temperature: 0, check patterns not exact strings
429 in CIParallel jobs sharing keyUse separate CI key
Secret not foundMissing GitHub secretAdd ANTHROPIC_API_KEY in repo Settings > Secrets

Output

The pipeline produces a fast unit-test result for every change and, on the allowed branch, a separate prompt-regression result. The latter is either a pass with the tested prompt assertions, a deliberate skip when no key is available, or an actionable failure that identifies a timeout, rate limit, response-contract regression, or cost-guard breach.

Examples

For a pull request that changes only formatting code, the workflow runs the mock-based suite and reports no live API calls. After that pull request merges to main, the protected regression job uses the repository secret to verify that the JSON extraction prompt still returns name, age, and city. If the response is malformed, the job fails at the assertion and preserves the test name in the CI log for triage.

Resources

Next Steps

For deployment automation, see anth-deploy-integration.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Add a synthetic-data CI gate for customer-owned Abridge integration code. Test consent handling, note-review handoffs, redaction, and rollback behavior with mocked vendor boundaries, without connecting CI to a live Abridge or EHR tenant.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Adding regression checks to an Abridge integration repository
  • Testing consent and note-release handling
  • Checking logs for sensitive data exposure
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28672026年10月23日 更新

Triage Abridge recording, note review, Epic handoff, and access problems using observed symptoms and approved guidance. Identify the affected workflow stage, organize a minimal timeline, and prepare a redacted escalation record for the responsible team.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Separate recording problems from upload failures
  • Investigate note creation delays and editor issues
  • Identify the responsible team for Epic handoff failures
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28672026年10月23日 更新

Map and review an Abridge clinical documentation workflow from consent and recording through draft review, evidence checks, edits, and final disposition. Keep clinician approval explicit, identify failure exits, and separate verified facts from tenant-specific details and pending approvals.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Map a clinical note workflow for a care setting
  • Check where consent and patient identity are verified
  • Review draft notes against linked evidence before sign-off
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28672026年10月23日 更新

Audit how clinician-reviewed Abridge note sections map into Epic templates and downstream workflows. Use approved test records to document destinations, exceptions, evidence, rollback steps, and a go or no-go decision for a specific environment.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Checking Abridge note section mappings to Epic templates
  • Auditing a department’s approved documentation handoff
  • Preparing test evidence and a go or no-go decision
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28672026年10月23日 更新

Review Abridge adoption and workflow value using local usage records, clinician feedback, and verified contract costs. Build an evidence based decision table covering adoption, quality, support burden, and options to expand, hold, or improve the rollout.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Reviewing adoption after an Abridge rollout
  • Preparing evidence for a renewal decision
  • Comparing workflow outcomes across care settings
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28672026年10月23日 更新

Prepare a bounded support bundle for an Abridge issue using allowlisted operational details such as versions, coarse timestamps, and correlation references. Exclude recordings, transcripts, patient identifiers, credentials, and unrestricted logs, then document redactions and review details.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Preparing reviewed evidence for an Abridge support case
  • Documenting redactions and excluded data
  • Collecting approved operational details for an incident
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28672026年10月23日 更新

查看 jeremylongshore 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题