跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

anth-data-handling

Set up privacy practices for Claude API workflows, including redacting personal data before requests, scanning responses, and logging request metadata without message content. Produce a sanitized handling record with retention and deletion outcomes.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

Implement data privacy, PII handling, and compliance patterns for Claude API. Use when handling sensitive data, implementing PII redaction, or configuring data retention for GDPR/CCPA compliance with Claude. Trigger with phrases like "anthropic data privacy", "claude PII", "anthropic gdpr", "claude data handling", "redact data claude".

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Redacting personal data before Claude API requests
  • Creating audit logs without prompt content
  • Defining retention and deletion procedures
  • Checking a data-handling flow with synthetic records

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md6.6 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Anthropic Data Handling

Overview

Anthropic's data policies: API inputs/outputs are NOT used for model training (commercial API). Zero-day retention is available. This skill covers PII redaction before sending to Claude and compliance patterns.

Anthropic Data Policies

PolicyDetails
Training dataAPI data is NOT used for training (commercial API)
Data retention30-day default; 0-day available via agreement
EncryptionTLS 1.2+ in transit, AES-256 at rest
SOC 2 Type IICertified
HIPAA BAAAvailable for eligible customers

PII Redaction Before API Calls

import re
import anthropic

def redact_pii(text: str) -> tuple[str, dict]:
    """Redact PII before sending to Claude, return redaction map for restoration."""
    redaction_map = {}
    patterns = [
        (r'\b\d{3}-\d{2}-\d{4}\b', 'SSN', '[SSN-REDACTED-{}]'),
        (r'\b[A-Za-z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Za-z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z|a-z]{2,}\b', 'EMAIL', '[EMAIL-REDACTED-{}]'),
        (r'\b\d{3}[-.]?\d{3}[-.]?\d{4}\b', 'PHONE', '[PHONE-REDACTED-{}]'),
        (r'\b\d{4}[- ]?\d{4}[- ]?\d{4}[- ]?\d{4}\b', 'CARD', '[CARD-REDACTED-{}]'),
    ]

    counter = 0
    for pattern, label, replacement in patterns:
        for match in re.finditer(pattern, text):
            counter += 1
            placeholder = replacement.format(counter)
            redaction_map[placeholder] = match.group()
            text = text.replace(match.group(), placeholder, 1)

    return text, redaction_map

def restore_pii(text: str, redaction_map: dict) -> str:
    """Restore redacted PII in Claude's response."""
    for placeholder, original in redaction_map.items():
        text = text.replace(placeholder, original)
    return text

# Usage
user_input = "Contact John at john@example.com or 555-123-4567"
safe_input, redactions = redact_pii(user_input)
# safe_input: "Contact John at [EMAIL-REDACTED-1] or [PHONE-REDACTED-2]"

client = anthropic.Anthropic()
msg = client.messages.create(
    model="claude-sonnet-4-20250514",
    max_tokens=256,
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": safe_input}]
)
final_output = restore_pii(msg.content[0].text, redactions)

Audit Logging

import json
import logging
from datetime import datetime, timezone

audit_logger = logging.getLogger("claude.audit")

def audited_request(client, user_id: str, purpose: str, **kwargs):
    """Wrap Claude API calls with audit logging."""
    # Log request metadata (never log content)
    audit_logger.info(json.dumps({
        "event": "claude.request",
        "timestamp": datetime.now(timezone.utc).isoformat(),
        "user_id": user_id,
        "purpose": purpose,
        "model": kwargs.get("model"),
        "max_tokens": kwargs.get("max_tokens"),
    }))

    response = client.messages.create(**kwargs)

    audit_logger.info(json.dumps({
        "event": "claude.response",
        "request_id": response._request_id,
        "input_tokens": response.usage.input_tokens,
        "output_tokens": response.usage.output_tokens,
        "stop_reason": response.stop_reason,
    }))

    return response

Data Handling Checklist

  • PII redacted before sending to Claude API
  • Audit logs capture who accessed what and when
  • Logs never contain message content or PII
  • Data retention policy matches your compliance needs
  • Zero-day retention enabled if required (contact Anthropic)
  • HIPAA BAA in place if handling PHI
  • User consent obtained for AI processing
  • Data deletion procedures documented

Error Handling

RiskMitigation
PII in promptsPre-call redaction pipeline
PII in responsesPost-call output scanning
Audit log gapsCentralized logging with alerting
Data subject access requestSearchable audit trail by user_id

Prerequisites

  • Define the data classification, processing purpose, legal basis or user consent, and retention owner before sending anything to the API.
  • Provide an approved redaction policy, a secret-manager-backed API credential, and an allowlisted Anthropic workspace or service boundary.
  • Prepare synthetic fixtures that exercise each PII class and a deletion test; do not use real customer records while validating the pipeline.

Instructions

  1. Classify the input and reject fields outside the approved purpose or destination. Apply deterministic redaction before constructing the request; keep any restoration map encrypted, access-controlled, and short-lived.
  2. Run the redaction, prompt, and response scanners against synthetic fixtures. A failed scan, missing consent, or unexpected content block is a hard stop; do not retry with the original data.
  3. Call the Messages API with the least-privileged credential and only the approved model, workspace, and retention configuration. Do not place prompts, responses, redaction maps, or secrets in logs, traces, metrics, or exception text.
  4. Scan the response before restoration or release. Record only aggregate counts, policy decisions, request identifier, and token metadata, then enforce the documented retention and deletion procedure.
  5. Verify deletion in the sandbox and retain a redacted audit receipt for the owner and compliance reviewer.

Output

Produce a redacted data-handling receipt containing the purpose, policy version, environment, workspace class, redaction and response-scan outcomes, request identifier, token counts, retention deadline, deletion result, and reviewer. Exclude names, contact details, prompt/response text, raw identifiers, redaction maps, and credentials.

Examples

For a synthetic fixture such as customer_id=fixture-017; email=test@example.invalid; purpose=classification, redact the email, call a sandbox workspace, assert raw_pii_sent=0 and sensitive_content_logged=0, and emit redaction=pass; output_scan=pass; retention=24h; deletion=verified. Never substitute a real person or production record in this example.

Resources

Next Steps

For enterprise access control, see anth-enterprise-rbac.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Add a synthetic-data CI gate for customer-owned Abridge integration code. Test consent handling, note-review handoffs, redaction, and rollback behavior with mocked vendor boundaries, without connecting CI to a live Abridge or EHR tenant.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Adding regression checks to an Abridge integration repository
  • Testing consent and note-release handling
  • Checking logs for sensitive data exposure
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28672026年10月23日 更新

Triage Abridge recording, note review, Epic handoff, and access problems using observed symptoms and approved guidance. Identify the affected workflow stage, organize a minimal timeline, and prepare a redacted escalation record for the responsible team.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Separate recording problems from upload failures
  • Investigate note creation delays and editor issues
  • Identify the responsible team for Epic handoff failures
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28672026年10月23日 更新

Map and review an Abridge clinical documentation workflow from consent and recording through draft review, evidence checks, edits, and final disposition. Keep clinician approval explicit, identify failure exits, and separate verified facts from tenant-specific details and pending approvals.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Map a clinical note workflow for a care setting
  • Check where consent and patient identity are verified
  • Review draft notes against linked evidence before sign-off
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28672026年10月23日 更新

Audit how clinician-reviewed Abridge note sections map into Epic templates and downstream workflows. Use approved test records to document destinations, exceptions, evidence, rollback steps, and a go or no-go decision for a specific environment.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Checking Abridge note section mappings to Epic templates
  • Auditing a department’s approved documentation handoff
  • Preparing test evidence and a go or no-go decision
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28672026年10月23日 更新

Review Abridge adoption and workflow value using local usage records, clinician feedback, and verified contract costs. Build an evidence based decision table covering adoption, quality, support burden, and options to expand, hold, or improve the rollout.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Reviewing adoption after an Abridge rollout
  • Preparing evidence for a renewal decision
  • Comparing workflow outcomes across care settings
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28672026年10月23日 更新

Prepare a bounded support bundle for an Abridge issue using allowlisted operational details such as versions, coarse timestamps, and correlation references. Exclude recordings, transcripts, patient identifiers, credentials, and unrestricted logs, then document redactions and review details.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Preparing reviewed evidence for an Abridge support case
  • Documenting redactions and excluded data
  • Collecting approved operational details for an incident
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28672026年10月23日 更新

查看 jeremylongshore 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题