跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

anth-incident-runbook

Respond to Claude API errors, latency, throttling, or degraded service with a bounded incident workflow. The skill helps classify severity, check provider and application signals, apply reversible mitigations, verify recovery, and prepare a redacted incident receipt and postmortem.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

Execute incident response procedures for Claude API outages and degradation. Use when Claude API is returning errors, experiencing high latency, or showing degraded performance in production. Trigger with phrases like "anthropic incident", "claude api down", "anthropic outage", "claude degraded", "anthropic runbook".

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Triage Claude API errors or outages
  • Investigate rate limits and high latency
  • Apply and verify a reversible mitigation
  • Prepare a redacted incident report

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md6.8 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Anthropic Incident Runbook

Severity Classification

SeverityConditionResponse Time
P1API returning 500/529 for all requestsImmediate
P2Rate limiting (429) or high latency (>10s p99)15 minutes
P3Intermittent errors (<5% error rate)1 hour
P4Degraded quality (not errors)Next business day

Immediate Triage (First 5 Minutes)

# 1. Check Anthropic status page
curl -s https://status.anthropic.com/api/v2/status.json | python3 -c \
  "import sys,json; d=json.load(sys.stdin); print(d['status']['indicator'], '-', d['status']['description'])"

# 2. Test API connectivity
curl -s -w "\nHTTP %{http_code} | Time: %{time_total}s\n" \
  https://api.anthropic.com/v1/messages \
  -H "x-api-key: $ANTHROPIC_API_KEY" \
  -H "anthropic-version: 2023-06-01" \
  -H "content-type: application/json" \
  -d '{"model":"claude-haiku-4-20250514","max_tokens":8,"messages":[{"role":"user","content":"1"}]}'

# 3. Check rate limit headers
curl -s -D - https://api.anthropic.com/v1/messages \
  -H "x-api-key: $ANTHROPIC_API_KEY" \
  -H "anthropic-version: 2023-06-01" \
  -H "content-type: application/json" \
  -d '{"model":"claude-haiku-4-20250514","max_tokens":8,"messages":[{"role":"user","content":"1"}]}' \
  2>/dev/null | grep -i "ratelimit\|retry-after\|request-id"

Decision Tree

API returning errors?
├── 401/403 → Key issue → Check ANTHROPIC_API_KEY is set and valid
├── 429 → Rate limited → Check headers, reduce traffic, wait for retry-after
├── 500 → Server error → Check status.anthropic.com, retry with backoff
├── 529 → Overloaded → Temporary, retry after 30-60s
└── Timeouts → Network or long generation → Increase timeout, check max_tokens

Mitigation Actions

Rate Limiting (429)

# Immediate: reduce traffic
# 1. Enable circuit breaker
# 2. Queue non-critical requests
# 3. Switch to Message Batches for bulk work
# 4. Reduce max_tokens to shorten generation time

API Outage (500/529)

# Graceful degradation
def get_response_with_fallback(prompt: str) -> str:
    try:
        msg = client.messages.create(
            model="claude-sonnet-4-20250514",
            max_tokens=1024,
            messages=[{"role": "user", "content": prompt}]
        )
        return msg.content[0].text
    except (anthropic.InternalServerError, anthropic.APIStatusError):
        return "Our AI assistant is temporarily unavailable. Please try again shortly."

Key Compromise

# 1. Immediately revoke key at console.anthropic.com
# 2. Generate new key
# 3. Deploy new key to all environments
# 4. Audit recent usage for unauthorized calls
# 5. File incident report

Postmortem Template

## Incident: [Title]
- **Duration:** [start] to [end]
- **Severity:** P[1-4]
- **Impact:** [what users experienced]
- **Root Cause:** [what went wrong]
- **Detection:** [how we found out]
- **Mitigation:** [what we did to fix it]
- **Request IDs:** [from debug logs]
- **Action Items:**
  - [ ] [preventive measure 1]
  - [ ] [preventive measure 2]

Error Handling

SymptomLikely CauseQuick Fix
All requests fail 401Key rotated/expiredCheck Console for active keys
Sudden 429 spikeTraffic burst or tier changeCheck rate limit headers
Slow responses (>10s)Large max_tokens or complex promptReduce max_tokens, use Haiku
Intermittent 500sUpstream API issueCheck status.anthropic.com

Overview

This runbook provides a bounded, evidence-driven response to Claude API outages, throttling, latency, key compromise, and degraded behavior. It separates provider diagnosis from application containment and requires a reversible change for every mitigation.

Prerequisites

  • Maintain on-call ownership, escalation contacts, status-page access, a sandbox health probe, circuit-breaker/fallback controls, and a tested rollback path.
  • Keep environment-specific keys in a secret manager with least privilege and documented revocation authority. Do not place credentials in incident chat or tickets.
  • Configure redacted telemetry for status class, request ID, model class, latency, rate-limit headers, aggregate impact, and change history; exclude prompts, completions, PII, tool arguments, and key material.

Instructions

  1. Declare severity from observed scope, record a correlation ID, and verify the issue with a synthetic sandbox probe before changing production traffic.
  2. Check provider status, request IDs, rate-limit metadata, application error/latency aggregates, and recent deploys. Distinguish provider failure from key, permission, network, or request-shape failure.
  3. Contain with the narrowest reversible control: reduce traffic, open the circuit, queue noncritical work, or use an already approved fallback. Preserve authorization and retention rules during degradation.
  4. For a suspected key compromise, revoke through the secret manager/provider console, rotate, deploy to one canary, verify, and then revoke the old credential. Avoid exposing the key while testing.
  5. Confirm recovery with synthetic probes and aggregate production metrics, then roll back emergency configuration if it caused scope, quality, cost, or data-handling regressions. Capture a redacted postmortem and clean temporary artifacts.

Output

Produce an incident receipt with severity, start/end times, affected scope, status/error classes, aggregate request impact, mitigation and owner, provider/request IDs, canary and recovery evidence, rollback/revocation reference, follow-up actions, and retention status. Never include raw content or credentials.

Examples

For a synthetic 529 spike, record severity=P1; probe=529; circuit=open; noncritical_queued=true; fallback=approved-static; side_effects=0, then perform one bounded half-open probe after the configured interval. If it passes, canary recovery and record rollback=ready; cleanup=verified; otherwise keep the circuit open and escalate.

Resources

Next Steps

For data compliance, see anth-data-handling.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Add a synthetic-data CI gate for customer-owned Abridge integration code. Test consent handling, note-review handoffs, redaction, and rollback behavior with mocked vendor boundaries, without connecting CI to a live Abridge or EHR tenant.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Adding regression checks to an Abridge integration repository
  • Testing consent and note-release handling
  • Checking logs for sensitive data exposure
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28692026年10月25日 更新

Triage Abridge recording, note review, Epic handoff, and access problems using observed symptoms and approved guidance. Identify the affected workflow stage, organize a minimal timeline, and prepare a redacted escalation record for the responsible team.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Separate recording problems from upload failures
  • Investigate note creation delays and editor issues
  • Identify the responsible team for Epic handoff failures
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28692026年10月25日 更新

Map and review an Abridge clinical documentation workflow from consent and recording through draft review, evidence checks, edits, and final disposition. Keep clinician approval explicit, identify failure exits, and separate verified facts from tenant-specific details and pending approvals.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Map a clinical note workflow for a care setting
  • Check where consent and patient identity are verified
  • Review draft notes against linked evidence before sign-off
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28692026年10月25日 更新

Audit how clinician-reviewed Abridge note sections map into Epic templates and downstream workflows. Use approved test records to document destinations, exceptions, evidence, rollback steps, and a go or no-go decision for a specific environment.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Checking Abridge note section mappings to Epic templates
  • Auditing a department’s approved documentation handoff
  • Preparing test evidence and a go or no-go decision
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28692026年10月25日 更新

Review Abridge adoption and workflow value using local usage records, clinician feedback, and verified contract costs. Build an evidence based decision table covering adoption, quality, support burden, and options to expand, hold, or improve the rollout.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Reviewing adoption after an Abridge rollout
  • Preparing evidence for a renewal decision
  • Comparing workflow outcomes across care settings
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28692026年10月25日 更新

Prepare a bounded support bundle for an Abridge issue using allowlisted operational details such as versions, coarse timestamps, and correlation references. Exclude recordings, transcripts, patient identifiers, credentials, and unrestricted logs, then document redactions and review details.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Preparing reviewed evidence for an Abridge support case
  • Documenting redactions and excluded data
  • Collecting approved operational details for an incident
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28692026年10月25日 更新

查看 jeremylongshore 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题