跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

anth-performance-tuning

Measure and improve Claude API performance through prompt caching, model selection, streaming, and controlled parallel requests. It compares latency, token use, throughput, and quality to document which configuration changes help.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

Optimize Claude API performance with prompt caching, model selection, streaming, and latency reduction techniques. Use when experiencing slow responses, optimizing token usage, or reducing time-to-first-token in production. Trigger with phrases like "anthropic performance", "claude speed", "optimize claude latency", "anthropic caching", "faster claude responses".

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Investigating slow Claude API responses
  • Reusing long prompts through caching
  • Comparing models for different task types
  • Testing concurrency changes while tracking quality

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md7.6 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Anthropic Performance Tuning

Overview

Optimize Claude API latency and throughput via prompt caching, model selection, streaming, and request optimization. The biggest wins come from prompt caching (90% input cost reduction) and model selection (Haiku is 4x faster than Sonnet).

Prompt Caching (Biggest Win)

import anthropic

client = anthropic.Anthropic()

# Mark long, reusable content with cache_control
# Cached content: 90% cheaper on subsequent requests, near-zero latency for cached portion
message = client.messages.create(
    model="claude-sonnet-4-20250514",
    max_tokens=1024,
    system=[
        {
            "type": "text",
            "text": "You are an expert on the following 50-page document: ...<long document>...",
            "cache_control": {"type": "ephemeral"}  # Cache this block
        }
    ],
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "What does section 3.2 say?"}]
)

# Check cache performance
print(f"Cache read tokens: {message.usage.cache_read_input_tokens}")   # Free/cheap
print(f"Cache creation tokens: {message.usage.cache_creation_input_tokens}")  # First call only
print(f"Uncached input tokens: {message.usage.input_tokens}")

Cache requirements: Minimum 1,024 tokens for Sonnet/Opus, 2,048 for Haiku. Cache lives for 5 minutes (refreshed on each hit).

Model Selection for Speed

ModelSpeedCost (per MTok in/out)Best For
Claude HaikuFastest$0.80 / $4.00Classification, extraction, routing
Claude SonnetBalanced$3.00 / $15.00General tasks, tool use, code
Claude OpusDeepest$15.00 / $75.00Complex reasoning, research
# Route by task complexity
def select_model(task_type: str) -> str:
    routing = {
        "classify": "claude-haiku-4-20250514",
        "extract": "claude-haiku-4-20250514",
        "summarize": "claude-sonnet-4-20250514",
        "code": "claude-sonnet-4-20250514",
        "research": "claude-opus-4-20250514",
    }
    return routing.get(task_type, "claude-sonnet-4-20250514")

Streaming for Perceived Speed

# Streaming reduces time-to-first-token from seconds to ~200ms
with client.messages.stream(
    model="claude-sonnet-4-20250514",
    max_tokens=2048,
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": prompt}]
) as stream:
    for text in stream.text_stream:
        yield text  # User sees response immediately

Reduce Token Count

# 1. Set max_tokens to what you actually need (not max)
msg = client.messages.create(
    model="claude-haiku-4-20250514",
    max_tokens=128,  # Not 4096 — smaller = faster generation
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Classify as positive/negative: 'Great product!'"}]
)

# 2. Use prefill to skip preamble
msg = client.messages.create(
    model="claude-sonnet-4-20250514",
    max_tokens=64,
    messages=[
        {"role": "user", "content": "Classify sentiment: 'Great product!'"},
        {"role": "assistant", "content": "Sentiment:"}  # Skip "Sure, I'd be happy to..."
    ]
)

# 3. Pre-check token count for large inputs
count = client.messages.count_tokens(
    model="claude-sonnet-4-20250514",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": large_document}]
)
if count.input_tokens > 100_000:
    # Chunk or summarize first
    pass

Parallel Requests

import Anthropic from '@anthropic-ai/sdk';
import PQueue from 'p-queue';

const client = new Anthropic();
const queue = new PQueue({ concurrency: 10 });

// Process multiple prompts in parallel (within rate limits)
const results = await Promise.all(
  prompts.map(p => queue.add(() =>
    client.messages.create({
      model: 'claude-haiku-4-20250514',
      max_tokens: 256,
      messages: [{ role: 'user', content: p }],
    })
  ))
);

Performance Benchmarks

OptimizationLatency ImpactCost Impact
Prompt caching-50% (cached portion)-90% input cost
Haiku over Sonnet-75% TTFT-73% cost
Streaming-80% TTFT (perceived)Same cost
Lower max_tokens-10-30% total timeSame cost
Prefill technique-20% output tokensProportional savings

Prerequisites

  • Define latency, throughput, quality, token, and error SLOs plus the owner-approved model, cache, concurrency, and retry policy.
  • Use pinned model IDs, synthetic prompts, an isolated workspace, and representative non-sensitive fixtures; do not benchmark with customer content or production credentials.
  • Configure aggregate-only telemetry, bounded concurrency, rate-limit awareness, and a tested rollback configuration.

Instructions

  1. Establish a baseline for time-to-first-token, completion latency, tokens, cache hit rate, throughput, quality, and errors using repeated synthetic runs.
  2. Change one lever at a time: model, prompt/cache layout, token budget, streaming, batching, or concurrency. Keep prompt content out of logs and verify cache eligibility for sensitive data before enabling it.
  3. Enforce request scope, max_tokens, timeout, retry, and concurrency limits. Stop the run when rate limits, quality, or data-policy checks fail rather than increasing access or disabling controls.
  4. Canary the selected configuration in a sandbox or internal workspace, compare against baseline, and obtain approval before production rollout. Monitor p95/p99 latency, error rate, token use, and spend.
  5. Restore the prior configuration on regression, invalidate temporary cache/test artifacts according to retention policy, and retain a redacted benchmark receipt.

Output

Produce a performance receipt containing configuration and model IDs, benchmark fixture class, sample size, latency/throughput/token/cache aggregates, quality and error outcomes, workspace/canary scope, approval, retention, and rollback reference. Exclude prompts, responses, user identifiers, and secrets.

Error Handling

FailureResponse
Rate limit or queue saturationReduce bounded concurrency, honor retry guidance, and stop the canary if the SLO remains breached.
Quality falls after model/token changeRestore the baseline configuration and quarantine the comparison until reviewed.
Cache miss or policy-ineligible contentDisable caching for that path and use the approved uncached flow.
Timeout or streaming disconnectApply bounded retry/idempotency handling, return a safe partial-state result, and investigate without logging content.

Examples

Benchmark 500 synthetic fixture-prompt-* requests in a staging workspace with Haiku and the current route, assert content_logged=0, p99_latency<approved_limit, and quality=pass, then canary the winner to internal traffic. If p99 or error thresholds fail, emit canary=halted; rollback=perf-baseline.

Resources

Next Steps

For cost optimization, see anth-cost-tuning.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Add a synthetic-data CI gate for customer-owned Abridge integration code. Test consent handling, note-review handoffs, redaction, and rollback behavior with mocked vendor boundaries, without connecting CI to a live Abridge or EHR tenant.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Adding regression checks to an Abridge integration repository
  • Testing consent and note-release handling
  • Checking logs for sensitive data exposure
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28692026年10月25日 更新

Triage Abridge recording, note review, Epic handoff, and access problems using observed symptoms and approved guidance. Identify the affected workflow stage, organize a minimal timeline, and prepare a redacted escalation record for the responsible team.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Separate recording problems from upload failures
  • Investigate note creation delays and editor issues
  • Identify the responsible team for Epic handoff failures
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28692026年10月25日 更新

Map and review an Abridge clinical documentation workflow from consent and recording through draft review, evidence checks, edits, and final disposition. Keep clinician approval explicit, identify failure exits, and separate verified facts from tenant-specific details and pending approvals.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Map a clinical note workflow for a care setting
  • Check where consent and patient identity are verified
  • Review draft notes against linked evidence before sign-off
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28692026年10月25日 更新

Audit how clinician-reviewed Abridge note sections map into Epic templates and downstream workflows. Use approved test records to document destinations, exceptions, evidence, rollback steps, and a go or no-go decision for a specific environment.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Checking Abridge note section mappings to Epic templates
  • Auditing a department’s approved documentation handoff
  • Preparing test evidence and a go or no-go decision
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28692026年10月25日 更新

Review Abridge adoption and workflow value using local usage records, clinician feedback, and verified contract costs. Build an evidence based decision table covering adoption, quality, support burden, and options to expand, hold, or improve the rollout.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Reviewing adoption after an Abridge rollout
  • Preparing evidence for a renewal decision
  • Comparing workflow outcomes across care settings
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28692026年10月25日 更新

Prepare a bounded support bundle for an Abridge issue using allowlisted operational details such as versions, coarse timestamps, and correlation references. Exclude recordings, transcripts, patient identifiers, credentials, and unrestricted logs, then document redactions and review details.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Preparing reviewed evidence for an Abridge support case
  • Documenting redactions and excluded data
  • Collecting approved operational details for an incident
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28692026年10月25日 更新

查看 jeremylongshore 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题