跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

anth-reference-architecture

Choose and plan a Claude API architecture for interactive requests, background jobs, or model routing. The skill lays out service components, failure handling, and safeguards so a team can test a selected pattern before production use.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

Implement Claude API reference architectures for common use cases. Use when designing a Claude-powered application, choosing between direct API vs queue-based, or planning a multi-model architecture. Trigger with phrases like "anthropic architecture", "claude system design", "anthropic reference architecture", "design claude integration".

集成工具Redis

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Choosing sync or queued Claude API calls
  • Planning background batch processing
  • Routing requests across Claude models
  • Designing failure handling for Claude integrations

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md7.2 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Anthropic Reference Architecture

Overview

Three validated architecture patterns for Claude API integrations: synchronous API gateway, async queue-based processing, and multi-model routing.

Architecture 1: Sync API Gateway (Simple)

User → API Gateway → Claude Service → Messages API
                                     ↓
                                   Response → User
# Best for: chatbots, interactive tools, low-volume (<100 RPM)
from fastapi import FastAPI
import anthropic

app = FastAPI()
client = anthropic.Anthropic(max_retries=3, timeout=60.0)

@app.post("/chat")
async def chat(prompt: str):
    msg = client.messages.create(
        model="claude-sonnet-4-20250514",
        max_tokens=1024,
        messages=[{"role": "user", "content": prompt}]
    )
    return {"text": msg.content[0].text, "tokens": msg.usage.output_tokens}

Architecture 2: Async Queue-Based (Scalable)

User → API → Queue (Redis/SQS) → Worker Pool → Messages API
  ↑                                                ↓
  └──────────── Status/Result ←── Result Store ←───┘
# Best for: batch processing, high-volume, background tasks
from redis import Redis
from rq import Queue
import anthropic

redis = Redis()
task_queue = Queue("claude-tasks", connection=redis)
result_store = Redis(db=1)

def process_task(task_id: str, prompt: str, model: str):
    client = anthropic.Anthropic()
    msg = client.messages.create(
        model=model,
        max_tokens=1024,
        messages=[{"role": "user", "content": prompt}]
    )
    result_store.setex(f"result:{task_id}", 3600, msg.content[0].text)

# Enqueue
import uuid
task_id = str(uuid.uuid4())
task_queue.enqueue(process_task, task_id, prompt, "claude-sonnet-4-20250514")

Architecture 3: Multi-Model Router

User → Router → Haiku    (classify/extract)
              → Sonnet   (general/code)
              → Opus     (research/complex)
              → Batches  (bulk/offline)
class ModelRouter:
    def __init__(self):
        self.client = anthropic.Anthropic()
        self.classifier = anthropic.Anthropic()  # Can be same client

    def route_and_execute(self, prompt: str, context: dict) -> str:
        # Step 1: Classify with Haiku (cheap, fast)
        classification = self.classifier.messages.create(
            model="claude-haiku-4-20250514",
            max_tokens=32,
            messages=[{
                "role": "user",
                "content": f"Classify this request as: simple|moderate|complex|bulk\n\n{prompt[:200]}"
            }]
        )
        complexity = classification.content[0].text.strip().lower()

        # Step 2: Route to appropriate model
        model_map = {
            "simple": "claude-haiku-4-20250514",
            "moderate": "claude-sonnet-4-20250514",
            "complex": "claude-opus-4-20250514",
        }
        model = model_map.get(complexity, "claude-sonnet-4-20250514")

        # Step 3: Execute with selected model
        msg = self.client.messages.create(
            model=model,
            max_tokens=4096,
            messages=[{"role": "user", "content": prompt}]
        )
        return msg.content[0].text

Project Layout

my-claude-app/
├── src/
│   ├── main.py              # FastAPI app
│   ├── claude/
│   │   ├── client.py         # Singleton + config
│   │   ├── router.py         # Model routing logic
│   │   ├── tools.py          # Tool definitions
│   │   └── prompts/          # System prompts as files
│   ├── workers/
│   │   └── claude_worker.py  # Queue consumer
│   └── middleware/
│       ├── rate_limiter.py   # App-level rate limiting
│       └── cost_tracker.py   # Spend monitoring
├── tests/
│   ├── unit/                 # Mocked tests
│   └── integration/          # Live API tests
└── config/
    ├── .env.development
    ├── .env.staging
    └── .env.production

Error Handling

ArchitectureFailure ModeMitigation
Sync Gateway429/5xx blocks userCircuit breaker + fallback response
Queue-BasedWorker crashesDead-letter queue + retry policy
Multi-ModelRouter misclassifiesDefault to Sonnet (safest middle)

Prerequisites

  • Choose the workload class, availability/latency SLOs, data classification, approved destinations, and synchronous versus asynchronous behavior with an owner.
  • Provide an isolated workspace, least-privileged secret-manager credential, synthetic fixtures, bounded queue/concurrency settings, and a tested rollback/circuit-breaker plan.
  • Define idempotency, retention, dead-letter, and redacted evidence requirements before selecting an architecture.

Instructions

  1. Select the smallest architecture that meets the workload: gateway for interactive calls, queue for asynchronous work, or a router only when model policy and quality tests justify it.
  2. Keep credentials and policy enforcement at the service boundary. Validate model, token, rate, data-class, source, and destination scope before enqueueing or sending a request.
  3. Exercise success, timeout, 429/5xx, duplicate, queue-retry, tool-use, and partial-response paths with synthetic fixtures. Ensure traces and result stores exclude prompts, responses, and secrets.
  4. Canary the selected topology in an isolated workspace, observe SLOs/cost/rate limits, and require approval before production traffic. Preserve the prior topology and configuration.
  5. On policy, reliability, or cost regression, open the circuit or pause workers, drain/quarantine unsafe work, roll back, and retain a redacted architecture receipt.

Output

Produce an architecture receipt naming the selected pattern, component/config digests, workspace and model classes, scope/idempotency/retention controls, synthetic test results, canary and SLO outcomes, approval, and rollback reference. Exclude request content, user identifiers, credentials, and raw queue payloads.

Examples

For 100 synthetic asynchronous classification jobs, use a sandbox queue with a bounded worker pool, assert duplicate_jobs=0; contacts_exported=0; content_logged=0, and canary one internal consumer. A queue failure yields paused=true; dead_letter=synthetic-only; rollback=worker-v1.

Resources

Next Steps

For multi-environment setup, see anth-multi-env-setup.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Add a synthetic-data CI gate for customer-owned Abridge integration code. Test consent handling, note-review handoffs, redaction, and rollback behavior with mocked vendor boundaries, without connecting CI to a live Abridge or EHR tenant.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Adding regression checks to an Abridge integration repository
  • Testing consent and note-release handling
  • Checking logs for sensitive data exposure
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28672026年10月23日 更新

Triage Abridge recording, note review, Epic handoff, and access problems using observed symptoms and approved guidance. Identify the affected workflow stage, organize a minimal timeline, and prepare a redacted escalation record for the responsible team.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Separate recording problems from upload failures
  • Investigate note creation delays and editor issues
  • Identify the responsible team for Epic handoff failures
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28672026年10月23日 更新

Map and review an Abridge clinical documentation workflow from consent and recording through draft review, evidence checks, edits, and final disposition. Keep clinician approval explicit, identify failure exits, and separate verified facts from tenant-specific details and pending approvals.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Map a clinical note workflow for a care setting
  • Check where consent and patient identity are verified
  • Review draft notes against linked evidence before sign-off
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28672026年10月23日 更新

Audit how clinician-reviewed Abridge note sections map into Epic templates and downstream workflows. Use approved test records to document destinations, exceptions, evidence, rollback steps, and a go or no-go decision for a specific environment.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Checking Abridge note section mappings to Epic templates
  • Auditing a department’s approved documentation handoff
  • Preparing test evidence and a go or no-go decision
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28672026年10月23日 更新

Review Abridge adoption and workflow value using local usage records, clinician feedback, and verified contract costs. Build an evidence based decision table covering adoption, quality, support burden, and options to expand, hold, or improve the rollout.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Reviewing adoption after an Abridge rollout
  • Preparing evidence for a renewal decision
  • Comparing workflow outcomes across care settings
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28672026年10月23日 更新

Prepare a bounded support bundle for an Abridge issue using allowlisted operational details such as versions, coarse timestamps, and correlation references. Exclude recordings, transcripts, patient identifiers, credentials, and unrestricted logs, then document redactions and review details.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Preparing reviewed evidence for an Abridge support case
  • Documenting redactions and excluded data
  • Collecting approved operational details for an incident
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28672026年10月23日 更新

查看 jeremylongshore 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题