跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

api-contract

Create a shared API contract that defines endpoint routes, request and response schemas, TypeScript interfaces, pagination, and error formats. It helps frontend and backend agents implement against the same agreed specification.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

Configure this skill should be used when the user asks about "API contract", "api-contract.md", "shared interface", "TypeScript interfaces", "request response schemas", "endpoint design", or needs guidance on designing contracts that coordinate backend and frontend agents. Use when building or modifying API endpoints. Trigger with phrases like 'create API', 'design endpoint', or 'API scaffold'.

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Defining request and response schemas for a new endpoint
  • Aligning frontend and backend work around one API specification
  • Standardizing pagination and error responses across endpoints

包含的文件(7)

  • SKILL.md5.6 KB
  • references/best-practices.md738 B
  • references/errors.md221 B
  • references/examples.md12.4 KB
  • references/pagination.md749 B
  • references/typescript-interfaces.md738 B
  • references/writing-endpoints.md805 B

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

API Contract

Overview

API Contract guides the creation of api-contract.md files that serve as the shared interface between backend and frontend agents during sprint execution. The contract defines request/response schemas, endpoint routes, TypeScript interfaces, and error formats so that implementation agents build to an agreed specification without direct coordination.

Prerequisites

  • Sprint directory initialized at .claude/sprint/[N]/
  • specs.md with defined feature scope and endpoint requirements
  • Familiarity with RESTful API conventions (HTTP methods, status codes, JSON schemas)
  • TypeScript knowledge for interface definitions (recommended)

Instructions

  1. Create api-contract.md in the sprint directory (.claude/sprint/[N]/api-contract.md). Define each endpoint using the standard format: HTTP method, route path, description, request body, response body with status code, and error codes. See ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/writing-endpoints.md for the full template.
  2. Define TypeScript interfaces for all request and response types. Use explicit types instead of any, mark optional fields with ?, and use string | null for nullable values. Reference ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/typescript-interfaces.md for canonical type patterns.
  3. For list endpoints, include pagination parameters and the PaginatedResponse<T> wrapper. Standardize on page, limit, sort, and order query parameters as documented in ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/pagination.md.
  4. Document all response states: success (200, 201, 204), client errors (400, 401, 403, 404, 422), and empty states. Use a consistent error response format with code, message, and optional details fields.
  5. Follow best practices from ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/best-practices.md: be specific about field constraints (e.g., "string, required, valid email format"), include request/response examples, reference shared types instead of duplicating, and omit implementation details (no database columns, framework names, or file paths).
  6. Share the contract file path in SPAWN REQUEST blocks so both backend and frontend agents read the same interface definition.

Output

  • api-contract.md containing all endpoint definitions with typed request/response schemas
  • TypeScript interface declarations for User, CreateUserRequest, LoginRequest, AuthResponse, ApiError, and domain-specific types
  • Paginated response wrappers for list endpoints
  • Standardized error format across all endpoints

Error Handling

ErrorCauseSolution
Backend and frontend schemas divergeContract updated without notifying both agentsAlways reference a single api-contract.md; never duplicate endpoint definitions
Missing error response codesContract only documents the happy pathDocument all status codes: 400, 401, 403, 404, 409, 422 per endpoint
Ambiguous field typesUsing string without constraintsSpecify format, length, and validation rules (e.g., "string, required, min 8 chars")
Pagination inconsistencyList endpoints use different parameter namesStandardize on the PaginatedResponse<T> interface for all list endpoints
Type mismatch between JSON and TypeScriptDates serialized inconsistentlyUse ISO 8601 datetime strings; document as "createdAt": "ISO 8601 datetime"

Examples

Authentication endpoint contract:

#### POST /auth/register

Create a new user account.

**Request:**
{
  "email": "string (required, valid email)",
  "password": "string (required, min 8 chars)",
  "name": "string (optional)"
}

**Response (201):**  # HTTP 201 Created
{
  "id": "uuid",
  "email": "string",
  "name": "string | null",
  "createdAt": "ISO 8601 datetime"  # 8601 = configured value
}

**Errors:**
- 400: Invalid request body  # HTTP 400 Bad Request
- 409: Email already exists  # HTTP 409 Conflict
- 422: Validation failed  # HTTP 422 Unprocessable Entity

Paginated list endpoint:

#### GET /products

List products with pagination.

**Query Parameters:**
| Param | Type | Default | Description |
|-------|------|---------|-------------|
| page | integer | 1 | Page number |
| limit | integer | 20 | Items per page (max 100) |
| sort | string | createdAt | Sort field |
| order | string | desc | Sort order (asc/desc) |

**Response (200):**  # HTTP 200 OK
{
  "data": [Product],
  "pagination": { "page": 1, "limit": 20, "total": 150, "totalPages": 8 }
}

Shared TypeScript interface:

interface ApiError {
  code: string;
  message: string;
  details?: Record<string, string[]>;
}

Resources

  • ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/writing-endpoints.md -- Endpoint definition template and key elements
  • ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/typescript-interfaces.md -- Canonical type definitions and guidelines
  • ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/pagination.md -- Pagination parameters and PaginatedResponse interface
  • ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/best-practices.md -- Contract authoring rules (specificity, DRY, no implementation details)

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Add a synthetic-data CI gate for customer-owned Abridge integration code. Test consent handling, note-review handoffs, redaction, and rollback behavior with mocked vendor boundaries, without connecting CI to a live Abridge or EHR tenant.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Adding regression checks to an Abridge integration repository
  • Testing consent and note-release handling
  • Checking logs for sensitive data exposure
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28672026年10月23日 更新

Triage Abridge recording, note review, Epic handoff, and access problems using observed symptoms and approved guidance. Identify the affected workflow stage, organize a minimal timeline, and prepare a redacted escalation record for the responsible team.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Separate recording problems from upload failures
  • Investigate note creation delays and editor issues
  • Identify the responsible team for Epic handoff failures
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28672026年10月23日 更新

Map and review an Abridge clinical documentation workflow from consent and recording through draft review, evidence checks, edits, and final disposition. Keep clinician approval explicit, identify failure exits, and separate verified facts from tenant-specific details and pending approvals.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Map a clinical note workflow for a care setting
  • Check where consent and patient identity are verified
  • Review draft notes against linked evidence before sign-off
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28672026年10月23日 更新

Audit how clinician-reviewed Abridge note sections map into Epic templates and downstream workflows. Use approved test records to document destinations, exceptions, evidence, rollback steps, and a go or no-go decision for a specific environment.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Checking Abridge note section mappings to Epic templates
  • Auditing a department’s approved documentation handoff
  • Preparing test evidence and a go or no-go decision
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28672026年10月23日 更新

Review Abridge adoption and workflow value using local usage records, clinician feedback, and verified contract costs. Build an evidence based decision table covering adoption, quality, support burden, and options to expand, hold, or improve the rollout.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Reviewing adoption after an Abridge rollout
  • Preparing evidence for a renewal decision
  • Comparing workflow outcomes across care settings
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28672026年10月23日 更新

Prepare a bounded support bundle for an Abridge issue using allowlisted operational details such as versions, coarse timestamps, and correlation references. Exclude recordings, transcripts, patient identifiers, credentials, and unrestricted logs, then document redactions and review details.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Preparing reviewed evidence for an Abridge support case
  • Documenting redactions and excluded data
  • Collecting approved operational details for an incident
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28672026年10月23日 更新

查看 jeremylongshore 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题