跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

apify-cost-tuning

Analyze Apify spending from Actor run history and tune memory, crawl duration, and proxy traffic. Produce cost comparisons and monthly reports, with an optional budget guard that stops runs once spending exceeds a set limit.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

Optimize Apify platform costs through memory tuning, compute unit management, and proxy budgeting. Use when analyzing Apify billing, reducing Actor run costs, or implementing usage monitoring and budget alerts. Trigger with "apify cost", "apify billing", "reduce apify costs", "apify pricing", "apify expensive", "apify budget", "compute units".

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Investigating a rise in Apify spending
  • Comparing memory settings and execution costs
  • Reducing residential proxy traffic
  • Creating monthly cost reports and spending limits

包含的文件(4)

  • SKILL.md5.6 KB
  • references/examples.md1.9 KB
  • references/implementation.md7.2 KB
  • references/pricing-model.md1.4 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Apify Cost Tuning

Overview

Apify charges on three axes: compute units (CU), proxy traffic (GB), and storage. One CU = 1 GB of memory running for 1 hour, so cost scales with both memory allocation and run duration. This skill walks the investigate → tune → guard loop that finds where spend is going, cuts it at the biggest lever (memory), and installs guardrails so it stays down.

Full pricing tables (plan CU prices, proxy rates, storage rules) live in pricing-model.md.

Prerequisites

  • An Apify account with API access and APIFY_TOKEN set in the environment.
  • The apify-client package installed (npm install apify-client).
  • At least one Actor with run history to analyze.

Instructions

The workflow is six steps. Each is summarized here with its core lever; the full, runnable code for every step is in implementation.md.

  1. Analyze current costs — roll up the last N days of runs into total CU, USD, and duration, and surface the single most expensive run:

    import { ApifyClient } from 'apify-client';
    const client = new ApifyClient({ token: process.env.APIFY_TOKEN });
    
    const { items: runs } = await client.actor(actorId).runs().list({ limit: 1000, desc: true });
    const totalUsd = runs.reduce((s, r) => s + (r.usageTotalUsd ?? 0), 0);
    
  2. Reduce memory allocation (biggest lever) — sweep memory from 4096 MB down to 256 MB and stop at the first failure to find the sweet spot. Most CheerioCrawler Actors are over-provisioned. Sweet spots: simple Cheerio 256-512 MB, complex 512-1024 MB, Playwright 2048-4096 MB.

  3. Optimize crawl duration — higher maxConcurrency, tighter requestHandlerTimeoutSecs, a maxRequestsPerCrawl cap, fewer retries, and selective enqueueLinks. Faster crawls consume fewer CUs.

  4. Minimize proxy costs — prefer datacenter (free with plan), only reach for residential when a site blocks it, block images/fonts/CSS to save residential GB, and reuse proxy sessions with useSessionPool.

  5. Cost guard for runaway Actors — start the run, poll usageTotalUsd every 30s, and .abort() once spend crosses a hard cap.

  6. Monitor monthly usage — iterate every Actor's runs since the 1st of the month and print a cost-descending report so the top spenders are obvious.

See full walkthrough for the complete code of each step, including the memory sweep, proxy hooks, budget guard, and monthly report.

Output

Running this skill produces:

  • A per-Actor cost analysis (runs, total CU, total USD, avg CU/run, avg cost/run, most expensive run) for a chosen lookback window.
  • A memory profile table mapping memory settings to status, duration, CU, and USD so you can pick the cheapest allocation that still succeeds.
  • A monthly cost report ranking every Actor by spend, with a grand total.
  • Tuned Actor configuration (reduced memory, capped crawls, proxy resource blocking) and an optional budget guard that aborts runs exceeding a USD ceiling.

Cost Optimization Checklist

  • Memory profiled (start low: 256-512MB for Cheerio)
  • maxRequestsPerCrawl set to prevent runaway crawls
  • Datacenter proxy used when possible (free with plan)
  • Residential proxy: images/CSS/fonts blocked to save bandwidth
  • maxConcurrency tuned (higher = faster = fewer CUs)
  • Scheduled runs have appropriate frequency (don't over-scrape)
  • Cost guard implemented for expensive runs
  • Monthly usage reviewed

Error Handling

IssueCauseSolution
Unexpected cost spikeNo maxRequestsPerCrawlAlways set an upper bound
High residential proxy costScraping images/fontsBlock non-essential resources
Over-provisioned memoryDefault 1024MBProfile and reduce to minimum
Too many scheduled runsAggressive cronReduce frequency if data freshness allows

Examples

Three worked scenarios chain the steps against concrete symptoms — a CheerioCrawler bill that tripled, runaway residential-proxy GB, and guarding a brand-new Actor. Each shows the full investigate → tune → verify loop. See examples.md.

Quick guard example — abort any run that exceeds $0.50:

// runWithBudget polls usageTotalUsd every 30s and aborts past the cap
const run = await runWithBudget('user/scraper', input, 0.50);

Resources

Next Steps

For architecture patterns, see apify-reference-architecture.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Add a synthetic-data CI gate for customer-owned Abridge integration code. Test consent handling, note-review handoffs, redaction, and rollback behavior with mocked vendor boundaries, without connecting CI to a live Abridge or EHR tenant.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Adding regression checks to an Abridge integration repository
  • Testing consent and note-release handling
  • Checking logs for sensitive data exposure
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28692026年10月25日 更新

Triage Abridge recording, note review, Epic handoff, and access problems using observed symptoms and approved guidance. Identify the affected workflow stage, organize a minimal timeline, and prepare a redacted escalation record for the responsible team.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Separate recording problems from upload failures
  • Investigate note creation delays and editor issues
  • Identify the responsible team for Epic handoff failures
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28692026年10月25日 更新

Map and review an Abridge clinical documentation workflow from consent and recording through draft review, evidence checks, edits, and final disposition. Keep clinician approval explicit, identify failure exits, and separate verified facts from tenant-specific details and pending approvals.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Map a clinical note workflow for a care setting
  • Check where consent and patient identity are verified
  • Review draft notes against linked evidence before sign-off
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28692026年10月25日 更新

Audit how clinician-reviewed Abridge note sections map into Epic templates and downstream workflows. Use approved test records to document destinations, exceptions, evidence, rollback steps, and a go or no-go decision for a specific environment.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Checking Abridge note section mappings to Epic templates
  • Auditing a department’s approved documentation handoff
  • Preparing test evidence and a go or no-go decision
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28692026年10月25日 更新

Review Abridge adoption and workflow value using local usage records, clinician feedback, and verified contract costs. Build an evidence based decision table covering adoption, quality, support burden, and options to expand, hold, or improve the rollout.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Reviewing adoption after an Abridge rollout
  • Preparing evidence for a renewal decision
  • Comparing workflow outcomes across care settings
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28692026年10月25日 更新

Prepare a bounded support bundle for an Abridge issue using allowlisted operational details such as versions, coarse timestamps, and correlation references. Exclude recordings, transcripts, patient identifiers, credentials, and unrestricted logs, then document redactions and review details.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Preparing reviewed evidence for an Abridge support case
  • Documenting redactions and excluded data
  • Collecting approved operational details for an incident
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28692026年10月25日 更新

查看 jeremylongshore 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题