跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

apify-prod-checklist

Prepare an Apify Actor, a program running on the platform, for production. Check configuration and builds, then set up scheduled runs, event notifications, health monitoring, rollback, and a spending limit that stops over-budget runs.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

Production readiness checklist for Apify Actor deployments. Use when deploying an Actor to production, preparing for launch, or validating Actor configuration, scheduling, monitoring, and rollback before going live. Trigger with "apify production", "deploy actor to prod", "apify go-live", "apify launch checklist", "actor production ready".

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Checking an Actor before its first production deployment
  • Setting up scheduled runs and completion notifications
  • Monitoring failures, timeouts, and running costs
  • Preparing rollback and budget limits

包含的文件(3)

  • SKILL.md6.3 KB
  • references/examples.md1.9 KB
  • references/implementation.md4.1 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Apify Production Checklist

Overview

Complete checklist for deploying Actors to the Apify platform and integrating them into production applications. Covers Actor configuration, scheduling, monitoring, alerting, and rollback. Work top to bottom: clear the pre-deployment gates, then run the six deploy steps, then wire the alert conditions.

Prerequisites

  • Actor tested locally with apify run
  • apify login configured with production token
  • Familiarity with apify-core-workflow-a and apify-deploy-integration

Pre-Deployment Checklist

Actor Configuration

  • .actor/actor.json has correct name, title, description
  • INPUT_SCHEMA.json validates all required inputs
  • Dockerfile uses pinned base image version (apify/actor-node:20, not latest)
  • package-lock.json committed (deterministic installs)
  • Memory set appropriately (start at 1024MB, tune after profiling)
  • Timeout set with buffer (2x expected runtime)

Code Quality

  • Actor.main() wraps entry point (handles init/exit/errors)
  • failedRequestHandler logs failures without crashing Actor
  • Input validation at Actor start (if (!input?.startUrls) throw ...)
  • No hardcoded URLs, credentials, or magic numbers
  • Proxy configured for target sites that block datacenter IPs
  • maxRequestsPerCrawl set to prevent runaway costs

Data Output

  • Dataset schema documented (consistent field names)
  • SUMMARY key-value store record saved with run stats
  • Large payloads chunked (9MB dataset push limit)
  • PII sanitized before storage

Instructions

Read the Actor's .actor/actor.json, INPUT_SCHEMA.json, and Dockerfile first to confirm the pre-deployment gates above, then run the six deploy steps. Each step's full command and code block lives in references/implementation.md; the skeleton is below.

  1. Deploy Actor — apify push, then apify builds ls to confirm the build, then apify actors call with a small production-like input to smoke-test on-platform.
  2. Configure Scheduling — create a cron schedule with client.schedules().create({...}) (or Apify Console: Actors > Your Actor > Schedules). Set cronExpression, runInput, and runOptions (memory/timeout).
  3. Set Up Webhooks — client.webhooks().create({...}) on ACTOR.RUN.SUCCEEDED/FAILED/TIMED_OUT with a payloadTemplate posting runId, status, and datasetId to your server.
  4. Monitor Runs — a checkActorHealth(actorId, lookbackHours) helper lists recent runs and reports success rate, failures, timeouts, and total cost.
  5. Implement Rollback — apify builds ls, then repoint the Actor at a prior build via the POST /v2/acts/ACTOR_ID?build=N API, or redeploy from a git tag.
  6. Cost Guard — runWithCostGuard(actorId, input, maxCostUsd) polls usageTotalUsd every 30s and aborts the run if it exceeds budget.

The first deploy step in full:

# Build and push to Apify platform
apify push

# Verify the build succeeded
apify builds ls

Output

Working through this skill produces a production-ready Actor with:

  • A pushed, verified build (apify builds ls shows a SUCCEEDED build).
  • A live cron schedule and a completion webhook firing on success/failure/timeout.
  • A repeatable health check printing success rate, failure/timeout counts, and 24h cost.
  • A tested rollback path (build repoint or git-tag redeploy).
  • A cost guard that aborts runs exceeding budget.

Health-check output looks like:

Actor: username/product-scraper
Last 24h: 3 runs, 66.7% success
Failed: 1, Timed out: 0
Total cost: $0.4213

Production Alert Conditions

AlertConditionSeverity
Run failedstatus === 'FAILED'P1
Run timed outstatus === 'TIMED-OUT'P2
Low yieldDataset items < expected thresholdP2
High costusageTotalUsd > budgetP2
Consecutive failures3+ failures in a rowP1
No runs in windowSchedule didn't triggerP1

Error Handling

IssueCauseSolution
Build fails on platformLocal deps differCommit package-lock.json
Schedule not firingCron syntax errorValidate at crontab.guru
Webhook not receivedURL not reachableUse ngrok for testing; check HTTPS
Memory exceededWorkload too largeIncrease memory or reduce concurrency
Unexpected cost spikeNo maxRequestsPerCrawlAlways set an upper bound

Examples

Four worked examples — a first production deploy, health-check output, a cost guard aborting a runaway run, and a build rollback — are in references/examples.md. A first production deploy in brief:

# Smoke-test on-platform with a tiny input before scheduling
apify actors call username/product-scraper \
  --input='{"startUrls":[{"url":"https://target.com"}],"maxItems":10}'

Then create the daily schedule and completion webhook (implementation.md Steps 2–3).

Resources

Next Steps

Once production is stable, plan version upgrades with the apify-upgrade-migration skill: it covers bumping the Actor base image, migrating INPUT_SCHEMA.json fields without breaking existing schedules, and re-running this checklist against the new build before repointing traffic.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Add a synthetic-data CI gate for customer-owned Abridge integration code. Test consent handling, note-review handoffs, redaction, and rollback behavior with mocked vendor boundaries, without connecting CI to a live Abridge or EHR tenant.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Adding regression checks to an Abridge integration repository
  • Testing consent and note-release handling
  • Checking logs for sensitive data exposure
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28672026年10月23日 更新

Triage Abridge recording, note review, Epic handoff, and access problems using observed symptoms and approved guidance. Identify the affected workflow stage, organize a minimal timeline, and prepare a redacted escalation record for the responsible team.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Separate recording problems from upload failures
  • Investigate note creation delays and editor issues
  • Identify the responsible team for Epic handoff failures
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28672026年10月23日 更新

Map and review an Abridge clinical documentation workflow from consent and recording through draft review, evidence checks, edits, and final disposition. Keep clinician approval explicit, identify failure exits, and separate verified facts from tenant-specific details and pending approvals.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Map a clinical note workflow for a care setting
  • Check where consent and patient identity are verified
  • Review draft notes against linked evidence before sign-off
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28672026年10月23日 更新

Audit how clinician-reviewed Abridge note sections map into Epic templates and downstream workflows. Use approved test records to document destinations, exceptions, evidence, rollback steps, and a go or no-go decision for a specific environment.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Checking Abridge note section mappings to Epic templates
  • Auditing a department’s approved documentation handoff
  • Preparing test evidence and a go or no-go decision
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28672026年10月23日 更新

Review Abridge adoption and workflow value using local usage records, clinician feedback, and verified contract costs. Build an evidence based decision table covering adoption, quality, support burden, and options to expand, hold, or improve the rollout.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Reviewing adoption after an Abridge rollout
  • Preparing evidence for a renewal decision
  • Comparing workflow outcomes across care settings
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28672026年10月23日 更新

Prepare a bounded support bundle for an Abridge issue using allowlisted operational details such as versions, coarse timestamps, and correlation references. Exclude recordings, transcripts, patient identifiers, credentials, and unrestricted logs, then document redactions and review details.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Preparing reviewed evidence for an Abridge support case
  • Documenting redactions and excluded data
  • Collecting approved operational details for an incident
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28672026年10月23日 更新

查看 jeremylongshore 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题