跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

apollo-ci-integration

Set up GitHub Actions for Apollo.io integrations, including linting, type checks, mock based unit tests, and live API checks on pushes to the main branch. Add a health check and scan source files for hardcoded API keys.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

Configure Apollo.io CI/CD integration. Use when setting up automated testing, continuous integration, or deployment pipelines for Apollo integrations. Trigger with phrases like "apollo ci", "apollo github actions", "apollo pipeline", "apollo ci/cd", "apollo automated tests".

集成工具GitHub

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Adding CI checks to an Apollo integration
  • Testing lead search with mocked API responses
  • Running live API checks after changes reach main

包含的文件(2)

  • SKILL.md7.3 KB
  • references/implementation-guide.md9.4 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Apollo CI Integration

Overview

Set up CI/CD pipelines for Apollo.io integrations with GitHub Actions. Uses MSW mocks for unit tests (zero API calls), sandbox tokens for staging, and live API tests gated to main branch only. Apollo's sandbox token returns dummy data without consuming credits.

Prerequisites

  • GitHub repository with Actions enabled
  • Apollo master API key + sandbox token
  • Node.js 18+

Instructions

Step 1: Store Secrets in GitHub

# Master API key for integration tests (main branch only)
gh secret set APOLLO_API_KEY --body "$APOLLO_API_KEY"

# Sandbox token for staging tests (safe, no credits)
gh secret set APOLLO_SANDBOX_KEY --body "$APOLLO_SANDBOX_KEY"

Step 2: GitHub Actions Workflow

# .github/workflows/apollo-ci.yml
name: Apollo CI
on:
  push:
    branches: [main]
  pull_request:
    branches: [main]

jobs:
  lint-and-typecheck:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
      - uses: actions/setup-node@v4
        with: { node-version: '20', cache: 'npm' }
      - run: npm ci
      - run: npm run lint
      - run: npm run typecheck

  unit-tests:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
      - uses: actions/setup-node@v4
        with: { node-version: '20', cache: 'npm' }
      - run: npm ci
      - run: npm test
        # Unit tests use MSW mocks — zero API calls

  integration-tests:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    if: github.event_name == 'push' && github.ref == 'refs/heads/main'
    needs: [unit-tests]
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
      - uses: actions/setup-node@v4
        with: { node-version: '20', cache: 'npm' }
      - run: npm ci
      - name: Apollo Health Check
        env:
          APOLLO_API_KEY: ${{ secrets.APOLLO_API_KEY }}
        run: |
          STATUS=$(curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" \
            -H "x-api-key: $APOLLO_API_KEY" \
            "https://api.apollo.io/api/v1/auth/health")
          echo "Apollo API: HTTP $STATUS"
          [ "$STATUS" = "200" ] || exit 1
      - run: npm run test:integration
        env:
          APOLLO_API_KEY: ${{ secrets.APOLLO_API_KEY }}

  secret-scan:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
      - name: Check for hardcoded API keys
        run: |
          if grep -rn 'x-api-key.*[a-zA-Z0-9]\{20,\}' src/ --include='*.ts' --include='*.js'; then
            echo "Potential hardcoded API key found!"
            exit 1
          fi
          echo "No hardcoded secrets"

Step 3: MSW-Based Unit Tests

// src/__tests__/apollo.test.ts
import { describe, it, expect, beforeAll, afterAll, afterEach } from 'vitest';
import { setupServer } from 'msw/node';
import { http, HttpResponse } from 'msw';

const BASE = 'https://api.apollo.io/api/v1';
const mockServer = setupServer(
  http.post(`${BASE}/mixed_people/api_search`, () =>
    HttpResponse.json({
      people: [{ id: '1', name: 'Jane Doe', title: 'VP Sales' }],
      pagination: { page: 1, per_page: 25, total_entries: 1, total_pages: 1 },
    }),
  ),
  http.post(`${BASE}/people/match`, () =>
    HttpResponse.json({
      person: { id: '1', name: 'Jane Doe', email: 'jane@test.com', title: 'VP Sales' },
    }),
  ),
  http.get(`${BASE}/auth/health`, () =>
    HttpResponse.json({ is_logged_in: true }),
  ),
);

beforeAll(() => mockServer.listen());
afterEach(() => mockServer.resetHandlers());
afterAll(() => mockServer.close());

describe('People Search', () => {
  it('returns contacts from search', async () => {
    const { searchPeople } = await import('../workflows/lead-search');
    const result = await searchPeople({ domains: ['test.com'] });
    expect(result.people).toHaveLength(1);
    expect(result.people[0].name).toBe('Jane Doe');
  });

  it('handles 429 errors', async () => {
    mockServer.use(
      http.post(`${BASE}/mixed_people/api_search`, () =>
        HttpResponse.json({ message: 'Rate limited' }, { status: 429 }),
      ),
    );
    const { searchPeople } = await import('../workflows/lead-search');
    await expect(searchPeople({ domains: ['test.com'] })).rejects.toThrow();
  });
});

Step 4: Integration Tests (Live API)

// src/__tests__/integration/apollo-live.test.ts
import { describe, it, expect } from 'vitest';
import axios from 'axios';

const SKIP = !process.env.APOLLO_API_KEY;
const client = axios.create({
  baseURL: 'https://api.apollo.io/api/v1',
  headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/json', 'x-api-key': process.env.APOLLO_API_KEY! },
});

describe.skipIf(SKIP)('Apollo Live Integration', () => {
  it('searches for people at apollo.io', async () => {
    const { data } = await client.post('/mixed_people/api_search', {
      q_organization_domains_list: ['apollo.io'],
      per_page: 5,
    });
    expect(data.people.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
  });

  it('enriches organization by domain', async () => {
    const { data } = await client.get('/organizations/enrich', { params: { domain: 'apollo.io' } });
    expect(data.organization).toBeDefined();
    expect(data.organization.name).toContain('Apollo');
  });
});

Output

  • GitHub Actions workflow with lint, typecheck, unit test, integration test, and secret scan jobs
  • MSW mock server for zero-API-call unit tests in PRs
  • Live integration tests gated to main branch pushes only
  • Apollo health check step before integration tests
  • Secret scanning to prevent API key commits

Examples

For a lead-search change, open a pull request with an MSW fixture that covers both a successful person search and a 429 response. The pull request runs lint, type checking, the mock-only tests, and the secret scan without exposing an Apollo credential or consuming credits. After merge, the protected main workflow performs the health check and the small live integration suite with the repository secret. If the health check is unavailable or the live request returns a non-success status, keep the change deployed only after the incident owner has either restored the provider path or explicitly disabled the live lane; do not broaden PR credentials to make the check pass.

Error Handling

IssueResolution
Secret not foundgh secret list to verify, re-add with gh secret set
Rate limited in CIUnit tests use MSW, integration tests run only on main
Health check failsCheck status.apollo.io; skip flaky on outage
Hardcoded key foundSecret scan job fails the build; rotate the key immediately

Resources

Next Steps

Proceed to apollo-deploy-integration for deployment configuration.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Add a synthetic-data CI gate for customer-owned Abridge integration code. Test consent handling, note-review handoffs, redaction, and rollback behavior with mocked vendor boundaries, without connecting CI to a live Abridge or EHR tenant.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Adding regression checks to an Abridge integration repository
  • Testing consent and note-release handling
  • Checking logs for sensitive data exposure
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28682026年10月25日 更新

Triage Abridge recording, note review, Epic handoff, and access problems using observed symptoms and approved guidance. Identify the affected workflow stage, organize a minimal timeline, and prepare a redacted escalation record for the responsible team.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Separate recording problems from upload failures
  • Investigate note creation delays and editor issues
  • Identify the responsible team for Epic handoff failures
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28682026年10月25日 更新

Map and review an Abridge clinical documentation workflow from consent and recording through draft review, evidence checks, edits, and final disposition. Keep clinician approval explicit, identify failure exits, and separate verified facts from tenant-specific details and pending approvals.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Map a clinical note workflow for a care setting
  • Check where consent and patient identity are verified
  • Review draft notes against linked evidence before sign-off
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28682026年10月25日 更新

Audit how clinician-reviewed Abridge note sections map into Epic templates and downstream workflows. Use approved test records to document destinations, exceptions, evidence, rollback steps, and a go or no-go decision for a specific environment.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Checking Abridge note section mappings to Epic templates
  • Auditing a department’s approved documentation handoff
  • Preparing test evidence and a go or no-go decision
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28682026年10月25日 更新

Review Abridge adoption and workflow value using local usage records, clinician feedback, and verified contract costs. Build an evidence based decision table covering adoption, quality, support burden, and options to expand, hold, or improve the rollout.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Reviewing adoption after an Abridge rollout
  • Preparing evidence for a renewal decision
  • Comparing workflow outcomes across care settings
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28682026年10月25日 更新

Prepare a bounded support bundle for an Abridge issue using allowlisted operational details such as versions, coarse timestamps, and correlation references. Exclude recordings, transcripts, patient identifiers, credentials, and unrestricted logs, then document redactions and review details.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Preparing reviewed evidence for an Abridge support case
  • Documenting redactions and excluded data
  • Collecting approved operational details for an incident
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28682026年10月25日 更新

查看 jeremylongshore 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题