跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

apollo-incident-runbook

Respond to Apollo.io API incidents with severity classification, diagnostic scripts, and recovery procedures. Use temporary call blocking and cached responses to handle failures, then document the timeline, customer impact, and corrective actions in a post-incident review.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

Apollo.io incident response procedures. Use when handling Apollo outages, debugging production issues, or responding to integration failures. Trigger with phrases like "apollo incident", "apollo outage", "apollo down", "apollo production issue", "apollo emergency".

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Triage an Apollo.io API outage
  • Diagnose authentication and rate-limit failures
  • Plan cached responses during an outage
  • Document an incident review

包含的文件(2)

  • SKILL.md8.0 KB
  • references/implementation-guide.md9.4 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Apollo Incident Runbook

Overview

Structured incident response for Apollo.io API failures. Covers severity classification, quick diagnosis, circuit breaker implementation, graceful degradation, and post-incident review. Apollo's public status page is at status.apollo.io.

Prerequisites

  • Valid Apollo API key
  • Access to monitoring dashboards

Instructions

Step 1: Classify Severity

Severity | Criteria                                    | Response Time
---------+---------------------------------------------+--------------
P1       | Apollo API completely unreachable            | 15 min
         | All enrichments/searches returning 5xx       |
P2       | Partial failures (>10% error rate)           | 1 hour
         | Rate limiting blocking critical workflows    |
P3       | Intermittent errors (<10%), degraded latency | 4 hours
         | Non-critical endpoint failures               |
P4       | Cosmetic issues, minor data inconsistencies  | Next sprint

Step 2: Quick Diagnosis Script

#!/bin/bash
# scripts/apollo-diagnosis.sh
set -euo pipefail
echo "=== Apollo Quick Diagnosis $(date -u +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ) ==="

# 1. Check Apollo status page
echo -e "\n--- Status Page ---"
curl -s https://status.apollo.io/api/v2/status.json 2>/dev/null | \
  python3 -c "import sys,json; d=json.load(sys.stdin); print(f'Status: {d[\"status\"][\"description\"]}')" \
  2>/dev/null || echo "Could not reach status page"

# 2. Test auth
echo -e "\n--- Auth Check ---"
curl -s -w "HTTP %{http_code} in %{time_total}s\n" \
  -H "x-api-key: $APOLLO_API_KEY" \
  "https://api.apollo.io/api/v1/auth/health" | head -1

# 3. Test people search (free endpoint)
echo -e "\n--- People Search ---"
curl -s -w "HTTP %{http_code} in %{time_total}s\n" -o /dev/null \
  -X POST -H "Content-Type: application/json" -H "x-api-key: $APOLLO_API_KEY" \
  -d '{"q_organization_domains_list":["apollo.io"],"per_page":1}' \
  "https://api.apollo.io/api/v1/mixed_people/api_search"

# 4. Check rate limit headers
echo -e "\n--- Rate Limits ---"
curl -s -D - -o /dev/null \
  -X POST -H "Content-Type: application/json" -H "x-api-key: $APOLLO_API_KEY" \
  -d '{"q_organization_domains_list":["apollo.io"],"per_page":1}' \
  "https://api.apollo.io/api/v1/mixed_people/api_search" 2>/dev/null | grep -i "x-rate-limit" || echo "No rate limit headers"

# 5. DNS resolution
echo -e "\n--- DNS ---"
dig +short api.apollo.io 2>/dev/null || nslookup api.apollo.io 2>/dev/null || echo "DNS lookup failed"

Step 3: Circuit Breaker

// src/resilience/circuit-breaker.ts
type State = 'closed' | 'open' | 'half-open';

export class CircuitBreaker {
  private state: State = 'closed';
  private failures = 0;
  private lastFailure = 0;
  private halfOpenSuccesses = 0;

  constructor(
    private failureThreshold: number = 5,
    private resetTimeoutMs: number = 60_000,
    private requiredSuccesses: number = 3,
  ) {}

  async execute<T>(fn: () => Promise<T>, fallback?: () => T): Promise<T> {
    if (this.state === 'open') {
      if (Date.now() - this.lastFailure > this.resetTimeoutMs) {
        this.state = 'half-open';
        this.halfOpenSuccesses = 0;
      } else {
        if (fallback) return fallback();
        throw new Error(`Circuit OPEN — Apollo calls blocked for ${Math.round((this.resetTimeoutMs - (Date.now() - this.lastFailure)) / 1000)}s`);
      }
    }

    try {
      const result = await fn();
      if (this.state === 'half-open') {
        this.halfOpenSuccesses++;
        if (this.halfOpenSuccesses >= this.requiredSuccesses) {
          this.state = 'closed';
          this.failures = 0;
        }
      } else {
        this.failures = 0;
      }
      return result;
    } catch (err) {
      this.failures++;
      this.lastFailure = Date.now();
      if (this.failures >= this.failureThreshold) this.state = 'open';
      if (fallback) return fallback();
      throw err;
    }
  }

  get status() { return { state: this.state, failures: this.failures }; }
}

Step 4: Graceful Degradation by Severity

import { CircuitBreaker } from './circuit-breaker';

const breaker = new CircuitBreaker(5, 60_000);

// P1: Total outage — serve cached data
async function handleP1() {
  console.error('[P1] Apollo API unreachable');
  return breaker.execute(
    () => client.post('/mixed_people/api_search', { per_page: 1 }),
    () => {
      console.warn('Serving cached search results');
      return { data: { people: [], source: 'cache', degraded: true } };
    },
  );
}

// P2: Partial failures — reduce load
async function handleP2() {
  console.warn('[P2] Apollo degraded — reducing concurrency');
  // Disable bulk enrichment, reduce search concurrency to 1
  // Continue serving search from cache where possible
}

// P3: Intermittent — retry with backoff
async function handleP3() {
  console.info('[P3] Intermittent errors — backoff enabled');
  // Retry with longer delays, log for monitoring
}

Step 5: Post-Incident Review Template

## Post-Incident Review: Apollo Integration

**Incident ID:** INC-YYYY-MM-DD-NNN
**Severity:** P1 / P2 / P3
**Duration:** HH:MM start to HH:MM resolved (X minutes)
**Apollo Status Page:** Reporting outage? Y/N

### Timeline
| Time (UTC) | Event |
|------------|-------|
| HH:MM | First alert fired (source: Prometheus/PagerDuty) |
| HH:MM | On-call acknowledged |
| HH:MM | Root cause identified |
| HH:MM | Mitigation applied (circuit breaker / cache fallback) |
| HH:MM | Apollo API restored |
| HH:MM | Circuit breaker closed, normal operations resumed |

### Impact
- Searches affected: N requests failed / served from cache
- Enrichments failed: N (credits not consumed)
- Sequences paused: N contacts delayed
- Revenue impact: $X (estimated pipeline delay)

### Root Cause
[Apollo-side outage / rate limiting / key rotation / network issue]

### Action Items
- [ ] Add/improve circuit breaker coverage (owner, due)
- [ ] Increase cache TTL for critical data (owner, due)
- [ ] Add alerting for [specific gap] (owner, due)

Output

  • Severity classification matrix (P1-P4) with response times
  • Bash diagnostic script (status page, auth, search, rate limits, DNS)
  • Circuit breaker with closed/open/half-open states
  • Graceful degradation procedures per severity level
  • Post-incident review template

Examples

During a suspected provider outage, the on-call engineer opens an incident, captures the status-page result and redacted diagnostic status codes, and switches the affected read path to its documented cache fallback. Enrichment and sequence writes stay paused while the circuit is open so unknown outcomes are not replayed. After Apollo recovers, allow the circuit breaker’s half-open probes to succeed before restoring normal traffic, then reconcile the queued work with idempotency keys or operator review. Close the incident only after the timeline, customer impact, and a tested corrective action are recorded.

Error Handling

IssueEscalation
P1 > 15 minPage on-call, open Apollo support ticket
P2 > 2 hoursNotify engineering management
Recurring P3Promote to P2 tracking issue
Apollo outageVerify at status.apollo.io, enable cache fallback

Resources

Next Steps

Proceed to apollo-data-handling for data management.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Add a synthetic-data CI gate for customer-owned Abridge integration code. Test consent handling, note-review handoffs, redaction, and rollback behavior with mocked vendor boundaries, without connecting CI to a live Abridge or EHR tenant.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Adding regression checks to an Abridge integration repository
  • Testing consent and note-release handling
  • Checking logs for sensitive data exposure
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28682026年10月23日 更新

Triage Abridge recording, note review, Epic handoff, and access problems using observed symptoms and approved guidance. Identify the affected workflow stage, organize a minimal timeline, and prepare a redacted escalation record for the responsible team.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Separate recording problems from upload failures
  • Investigate note creation delays and editor issues
  • Identify the responsible team for Epic handoff failures
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28682026年10月23日 更新

Map and review an Abridge clinical documentation workflow from consent and recording through draft review, evidence checks, edits, and final disposition. Keep clinician approval explicit, identify failure exits, and separate verified facts from tenant-specific details and pending approvals.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Map a clinical note workflow for a care setting
  • Check where consent and patient identity are verified
  • Review draft notes against linked evidence before sign-off
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28682026年10月23日 更新

Audit how clinician-reviewed Abridge note sections map into Epic templates and downstream workflows. Use approved test records to document destinations, exceptions, evidence, rollback steps, and a go or no-go decision for a specific environment.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Checking Abridge note section mappings to Epic templates
  • Auditing a department’s approved documentation handoff
  • Preparing test evidence and a go or no-go decision
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28682026年10月23日 更新

Review Abridge adoption and workflow value using local usage records, clinician feedback, and verified contract costs. Build an evidence based decision table covering adoption, quality, support burden, and options to expand, hold, or improve the rollout.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Reviewing adoption after an Abridge rollout
  • Preparing evidence for a renewal decision
  • Comparing workflow outcomes across care settings
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28682026年10月23日 更新

Prepare a bounded support bundle for an Abridge issue using allowlisted operational details such as versions, coarse timestamps, and correlation references. Exclude recordings, transcripts, patient identifiers, credentials, and unrestricted logs, then document redactions and review details.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Preparing reviewed evidence for an Abridge support case
  • Documenting redactions and excluded data
  • Collecting approved operational details for an incident
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28682026年10月23日 更新

查看 jeremylongshore 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题